Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 121, Issue 7, July 2014, Pages 1350-1358
Ophthalmology

Original article
Rates of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.017Get rights and content

Purpose

To compare the rates of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss in patients suspected of having glaucoma who developed visual field damage (VFD) with those who did not develop VFD and to determine whether the rate of RNFL loss can be used to predict the development of VFD.

Design

Prospective, observational cohort study.

Participants

Glaucoma suspects, defined as having glaucomatous optic neuropathy or ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure, >21 mmHg) without repeatable VFD at baseline, from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study.

Methods

Global and quadrant RNFL thickness (RNFLT) were measured with the Spectralis spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT; Spectralis HRA+OCT [Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany]). Visual field damage was defined as having 3 consecutive abnormal visual fields. The rate of RNFL loss in eyes developing VFD was compared to eyes not developing VFD using multivariate linear mixed-effects models. A joint longitudinal survival model used the estimated RNFLT slope to predict the risk of developing VFD, while adjusting for potential confounding variables.

Main Outcome Measures

The rate of RNFL thinning and the probability of developing VFD.

Results

Four hundred fifty-four eyes of 294 glaucoma suspects were included. The average number of SD-OCT examinations was 4.6 (range, 2–9), with median follow-up of 2.2 years (0.4–4.1 years). Forty eyes (8.8%) developed VFD. The estimated mean rate of global RNFL loss was significantly faster in eyes that developed VFD compared with eyes that did not develop VFD (−2.02 μm/year vs. −0.82 μm/year; P < 0.001). The joint longitudinal survival model showed that each 1-μm/year faster rate of global RNFL loss corresponded to a 2.05-times higher risk of developing VFD (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–3.71; P = 0.017).

Conclusions

The rate of global RNFL loss was more than twice as fast in eyes that developed VFD compared with eyes that did not develop VFD. A joint longitudinal survival model showed that a 1-μm/year faster rate of RNFLT loss corresponded to a 2.05-times higher risk of developing VFD. These results suggest that measuring the rate of SD-OCT RNFL loss may be a useful tool to help identify patients who are at a high risk of developing visual field loss.

Section snippets

Study Design

Subjects were enrolled from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study. The study design has been described in detail previously.32 In brief, participants in these studies were evaluated every 6 months, in which patients underwent extensive predetermined clinical examinations. Inclusion criteria for these studies were open angles, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better, a spherical refraction within ±5.0 diopters (D), and

Study Population

Four hundred fifty-four eyes of 294 glaucoma suspects were included. One hundred eighty-three patients (62.2%) were women. Mean age ± standard deviation at baseline was 64.5±11.3 years. Ninety-two subjects (31.3%) were of African descent and 202 subjects (68.7%) were of European descent. At the baseline examination, 239 eyes (52.6%) were categorized as having ocular hypertension. The average number of OCT examinations per eye was 4.6 (range, 2–9), with median follow-up of 2.2 years.

Baseline Factors

Forty eyes

Discussion

In this cohort of glaucoma suspects followed up for a relatively short period (2.2 years), eyes in which VFD developed had an approximately 2.5-times faster rate of RNFLT loss compared with eyes that did not develop VFD. Moreover, a 1-μm/year faster rate of RNFL loss resulted in a 2.05-times higher risk of developing VFD. These results suggest that the rate of RNFL loss measured with SD-OCT may be useful for identifying which glaucoma suspect patients are at the highest risk of developing VFD.

References (61)

  • K.R. Sung et al.

    Progression detection capability of macular thickness in advanced glaucomatous eyes

    Ophthalmology

    (2012)
  • C.K. Leung et al.

    Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a prospective analysis of age-related loss

    Ophthalmology

    (2012)
  • R.N. Weinreb et al.

    Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (1995)
  • S. Funaki et al.

    Relationship between age and the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer in normal subjects

    Jpn J Ophthalmol

    (1999)
  • A.G. Balazsi et al.

    The effect of age on the nerve fiber population of the human optic nerve

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (1984)
  • M.X. Repka et al.

    The effect of age on normal human optic nerve fiber number and diameter

    Ophthalmology

    (1989)
  • J.D. Brandt et al.

    Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) Group. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)

    Ophthalmology

    (2001)
  • M.C. Leske et al.

    Predictors of long-term progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial

    Ophthalmology

    (2007)
  • C.A. Girkin et al.

    Differences in optic disc topography between black and white normal subjects

    Ophthalmology

    (2005)
  • M. Kass et al.

    The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2002)
  • European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group

    Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study

    Ophthalmology

    (2005)
  • J. Flammer et al.

    Differential light threshold: short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1984)
  • K.E. Kutzko et al.

    Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2000)
  • F.G. Junoy Montolio et al.

    Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2012)
  • J.C. Tan et al.

    Approach for identifying glaucomatous optic nerve progression by scanning laser tomography

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2003)
  • J.C. Tan et al.

    Optimizing and validating an approach for identifying glaucomatous change in optic nerve topography

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2004)
  • A.J. Patterson et al.

    A new statistical approach for quantifying change in series of retinal and optic nerve head topography images

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2005)
  • G. Wollstein et al.

    Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2005)
  • E.J. Lee et al.

    Ability of Stratus OCT to detect progressive retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy in glaucoma

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2009)
  • N.G. Strouthidis et al.

    Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2006)
  • Cited by (155)

    • Endpoints for clinical trials in ophthalmology

      2023, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have made the following disclosure(s):

    Atsuya Miki: Financial support – Nidek

    Felipe A. Medeiros: Financial support – Carl-Zeiss Meditec, Heidelberg Engineering, Topcon, Inc.

    Robert N. Weinreb: Financial support – Nidek, Topcon, Zeiss Meditec, Alcon, Allergan, Bausch & Lomb; Nonfinancial support – Heidelberg Engineering; Patent - RGC Index

    Jeffrey M. Liebmann: Financial support – Carl Zeiss Meditec, Topcon, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Allergan, Inc, Diopsys Corporation, Glaukos Corporation, Heidelberg Engineering, Merz Pharmaceutical, Inc, Optovue, Inc, Quark Pharmaceuticals, Inc, SOLX, Inc.

    Christopher A. Girkin: Financial support – Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Heidelberg Engineering.

    Linda M. Zangwill: Nonfinancial support – Heidelberg Engineering, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Topcon, Inc.

    Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Allergan, Inc, Pfizer, Inc., Merck, Inc, and Santen, Inc, provided the participants' glaucoma medications at no charge.

    Supported by the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (grant nos.: P30EY022589 (L.M.Z.), U10EY14267 (L.M.Z.) EY019869 (L.M.Z.), EY021818 (F.A.M.), EY022039 (C.B.), EY08208 (F.A.M.), EY11008 (L.M.Z.), and EY13959) (C.A.G.); Eyesight Foundation of Alabama, Birmingham, AL (C.A.G.); the Edith C. Blum Research Fund of the New York Glaucoma Research Institute, New York, New York (J.M.L.); Japan Eye Bank Association, Tokyo, Japan (Overseas Research Grant [A.M.]); Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York (unrestricted grant) (R.N.W.).

    View full text