Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 115, Issue 10, October 2008, Pages 1720-1727.e2
Ophthalmology

Original article
Screening for Narrow Angles in the Singapore Population: Evaluation of New Noncontact Screening Methods

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.015Get rights and content

Purpose

To assess the screening effectiveness of 3 new noncontact devices, the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer (SPAC) (Takagi, Nagano, Japan), which measures peripheral anterior chamber depth (ACD); IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), which measures central ACD; and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Visante, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), which images the angles, and to compare these instruments with gonioscopy in identifying people with narrow angles (NAs).

Design

Cross-sectional, observational, community-based study.

Participants

Phakic subjects aged ≥50 years without ophthalmic symptoms who were recruited from a community polyclinic in Singapore.

Methods

All subjects underwent examination with SPAC, IOLMaster, and AS-OCT in the dark by a single operator. Gonioscopy was performed by an ophthalmologist masked to the instruments' findings. The area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was generated to assess the performance of these tests in detecting people with a NA in either eye.

Main Outcome Measures

Eyes were classified as having NAs by gonioscopy if the posterior pigmented trabecular meshwork could be seen for ≤2 quadrants of the angle circumference with or without peripheral anterior synechiae.

Results

A total of 2052 subjects were examined and underwent all 3 tests. The prevalence of a NA in at least 1 eye diagnosed by gonioscopy was 20.4% (422 subjects). The AUC for the SPAC using a numeric grade <5 as a cutoff was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82–0.85), with a sensitivity of 90.0% (95% CI, 86.8–92.7) and a specificity of 76.6% (95% CI, 74.4–78.6). The AUC for the IOLMaster at an ACD cutoff of <2.87 mm was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.81–0.85), with a sensitivity of 87.7% (95% CI, 84.2–90.7) and a specificity of 77.7% (95% CI, 75.6–79.7). The AUC for the AS-OCT was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.74–0.78), with a sensitivity of 88.4% (95% CI, 84.9–91.3) and a specificity of 62.9% (95% CI, 60.5–65.2).

Conclusions

The low specificity found with the SPAC, IOLMaster, and AS-OCT may limit the usefulness of these devices in screening for NAs.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Section snippets

Study Population and Recruitment

The study had the approval of the ethics review board of the Singapore Eye Research Institute and was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. In this prospective cross-sectional study, subjects aged >50 years who did not have any ophthalmic symptoms were recruited from a government-run community polyclinic providing primary health care services. This polyclinic serves >10,000 people per month, mainly of lower to middle socioeconomic status with a high proportion

Results

A total of 2114 subjects were screened from December of 2005 to June of 2006. Twelve subjects were ineligible because they were pseudophakic in both eyes or were known to have glaucoma and were excluded. Approximately 90% of subjects were Chinese, with a mean age of 63.3±8.0 years, and 1085 (52.9%) were women (Table 1). Of the 2102 eligible subjects, 50 subjects could not complete the tests for various reasons: alignment errors (12); inability to follow instructions (16) or focus on the

Discussion

The ideal community-based screening test should be clinician-independent, quick, and noninvasive, and have a very high specificity. Although a high sensitivity is important, the choice of the specific thresholds used to trigger a referral for examination is as much a question of public health and health economics issue as a clinical one. The severity of the disease and its impact on the national economy and personal finances need to be balanced against individual and national costs of testing,

References (40)

  • T.Y. Wong et al.

    The epidemiology of age related eye diseases in Asia

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2006)
  • P.J. Foster et al.

    Glaucoma in Mongolia: a population-based survey in Hovsgol Province, northern Mongolia

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1996)
  • P.J. Foster et al.

    The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2000)
  • A. Jacob et al.

    Prevalence of primary glaucoma in an urban south Indian population

    Indian J Ophthalmol

    (1998)
  • M. He et al.

    Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan district, Guangzhou

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2006)
  • W.P. Nolan et al.

    YAG laser iridotomy treatment for primary angle closure in East Asian eyes

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2000)
  • J.M. Tielsch et al.

    A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1991)
  • P.H. Alsbirk

    Primary angle closure glaucoma: oculometry, epidemiology, and genetics in a high risk population

    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl

    (1976)
  • P.H. Alsbirk

    Anterior chamber depth and primary angle closure glaucoma I An epidemiological study in Greenland Eskimos

    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)

    (1975)
  • R.F. Lowe

    Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angle closure glaucoma: biometrical comparisons between normal eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (1970)
  • Cited by (92)

    • Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Swept-Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Primary Angle Closure Disease

      2022, American Journal of Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      ACD is a parameter that has been extensively studied and found to be a significant risk factor of PACD.20-28 However, using ACD to diagnose PACD, as defined by gonioscopy, has yielded only moderate performance in the literature—sensitivity and specificity are often around 70% to 80%.24,26,29-33 ACD measured from SS-OCT, on the other hand, provides much higher diagnostic power with >85% sensitivity and specificity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Manuscript no. 2007–1464.

    Financial Disclosure(s): Dr Kashiwagi has a Japanese patent on the SPAC (Japanese patent No. 3878164). Dr Friedman has been a paid consultant to Carl Zeiss-Meditec. Dr Foster has received honoraria and travel support from Carl Zeiss Meditec. Dr Aung has received research funding and travel support from Carl Zeiss Meditec.

    Supported by a grant from Singhealth Foundation, Singapore. The authors' work was independent of the funders (the funding source had no involvement).

    These authors (R.L. and P.J.F.) contributed equally to this work.

    View full text