Metabolic control and complications in Italian people with diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
Introduction
In the past 25 years, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) has become a viable alternative to multiple daily insulin injections (MDIs) in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Meta-analyses of both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have found lower glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level, less severe hypoglycaemic (SH) episodes and a better quality of life in people on CSII than those on MDI [1], [2], [3]. The limitations of these reviews, however, are the inclusion of MDI-treated individuals who do not use basal insulin analogue and CSII-treated individuals who use regular insulin. Recent studies comparing treatments with CSII and MDI along with insulin analogue showed less evident benefits for CSII [4], [5].
A sensor-augmented insulin pump (SAP) is an insulin pump that has the feature of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). RCTs have shown that SAPs improve metabolic control without increasing SH episodes in individuals with T1DM with elevated HbA1c levels, and SAPs reduce the frequency and duration of hypoglycaemic events in individuals with satisfactory glucose control [6], [7], [8]. Recent studies have also suggested the protective role of CSII against chronic diabetic complications and cardiovascular mortality [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].
In 2013, we performed a survey on CSII in Italy and addressed the organisation of diabetes centres and care recipients and device characteristics [14]. Factors such as quality of glycaemic control and acute and chronic metabolic complications were not considered in that survey. In this study, we report a new survey to investigate metabolic control and diabetic complications in CSII-treated individuals in Italy.
Section snippets
Study design
In this multicentre cross-sectional study, data were collected using questionnaires sent by e-mail to adult and paediatric diabetes care centres that use CSII for treatment. Centres were identified from previous surveys and through information from companies selling CSII devices. Incomplete data were obtained by phone or e-mail and integrated.
Participants
Subjects treated with CSII for at least 1 year were consecutively enrolled among people who attended diabetes outpatient clinics between September 2015
Study participants and centres
Italy has 272 diabetes care centres that use CSII for treatment. Of them, 93 were included in the study – 21 offering paediatric care and 72 offering adult care – caring for 6623 patients.
In 41% of the adult care centres, the caring team composed of physician, dietician and nurse, whereas 71% of the paediatric centres had a team composed of physician, nurse, dietician and psychologist. Among the centres, 71% offering adult care and 86% offering paediatric care were available around the clock.
Discussion
We analysed metabolic control and acute and chronic diabetic complications in a cohort of Italian paediatric and adult individuals with diabetes mellitus who were treated with CSII. Participants belonged to 16 of the 19 regions of Italy.
We found that 43% of paediatric and 23% of adult individuals achieved age-specific HbA1c targets. Concerning adults, our data agree with the US T1D Exchange clinic registry, but considering the paediatric population, the fraction on target in Italy is almost
Conclusions
We provide an overview of the metabolic control and frequency of acute complications of diabetes in Italian individuals treated with CSII. Mean HbA1c levels were satisfactory, but only 43% of children and 23% of adults achieved their age-specific HbA1c target levels. Better metabolic control was associated with CHO counting, use of advanced pump functions, compliance with sensor use, pregnancy in the year before the study and longer duration of diabetes. The low frequency of SH episodes
Contributor statement
All authors contributed substantially to the study design; data collection, analysis and interpretation; and manuscript writing and revision. All authors approved the publication of the final version of the manuscript. No author received any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or non-profit sectors for the research.
Conflict of interest
GL acted as advisory board member for Eli Lilly, Boheringer Ingelheim and Merck Sharp & Dohme and received speaker honorary from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi Aventis and Astrazeneca.
RB acted as advisory board member for Lifescan, Novo Nordisk, Roche and Eli Lilly and received speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly, Abbott, Sanofi Aventis, Theras, Medtronic and Ypsomed.
LB none.
VDB none.
AG none.
GG acted as advisory board member for Johnson & Johnson and Novo Nordisk and received speaker honoraria from Novo
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the statistician Francesco Cavallin, MSc, for his critical, comprehensive review of our statistical analysis.
References (25)
- et al.
Severe hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis over one year in Italian pediatric population with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter retrospective observational study
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
(2014 May) - et al.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2010 Jan 20) - et al.
Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ann Intern Med
(2012 Sep 4) - et al.
Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
Diabet Med
(2008 Jul) - et al.
Comparison of a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (basal once-daily glargine plus mealtime lispro) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (lispro) in type 1 diabetes: a randomized open parallel multicenter study
Diabetes Care
(2009 Jul) - et al.
In Type 1 diabetic patients with good glycaemic control, blood glucose variability is lower during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion than during multiple daily injections with insulin glargine
Diabet Med
(2008 Mar) - et al.
Sensor-augmented pump therapy lowers HbA(1c) in suboptimally controlled Type 1 diabetes; a randomized controlled trial
Diabet Med
(2011 Oct) - et al.
Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia
N Engl J Med
(2013 Jul 18) - et al.
Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial
J Am Med Assoc
(2013 Sep 25) - et al.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is more effective than multiple daily insulin injections in preventing albumin excretion rate increase in Type 1 diabetic patients
Diabet Med
(2009 Jun)