Elsevier

Neurotoxicology and Teratology

Volume 32, Issue 3, May–June 2010, Pages 346-355
Neurotoxicology and Teratology

Effect of a neurotoxic dose regimen of (+)-methamphetamine on behavior, plasma corticosterone, and brain monoamines in adult C57BL/6 mice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2010.01.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Rationale

In rats, neurotoxic doses of methamphetamine (MA) induce astrogliosis, long lasting monoamine reductions, reuptake transporter down-regulation, and learning impairments.

Objective

We tested whether comparable effects occur in C57BL/6 mice.

Method

C57BL/6 mice were treated with 10 mg/kg s.c. × 4 MA on a single day and evaluated at various intervals thereafter.

Results

The neurotoxic dose regimen of MA caused the predicted acute hyperthermia and increased striatal glial fibrillary acidic protein and reduced neostriatal dopamine. The MA-treated mice were hypoactive 24 h later but not 48 h later. MA-treated mice also showed exaggerated initial hyperactivity after a pharmacological dose of MA used to stimulate locomotion followed by a later phase of hypoactivity compared to saline-treated mice. No differences were observed on learning or memory tests (novel object recognition, egocentric, or spatial learning/memory). MA-treated mice showed a trend toward increased prepulse inhibition but not baseline acoustic startle reactivity. After testing, MA-treated mice showed reduced neostriatal dopamine and increased basal plasma corticosterone.

Conclusions

A neurotoxic/binge regimen of MA in mice that produces the typical pattern of neurotoxic changes to those seen in rats, results in few behavioral changes. This may limit the utility of C57BL/6 mice for modeling the cognitive and behavioral effects described in human MA users who show such changes even after prolonged abstinence.

Introduction

Chronic methamphetamine (MA) abuse results in evidence of neurotoxicity and compromised cognition [16]. Magnetic resonance imaging of chronic MA users shows increased globus pallidus and putamen and decreased hippocampal volume [17], [72]. [1H]-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of MA users reveals reduced N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratios in the anterior cingulate and reduced creatine in the basal ganglia [54], [63], [67]. Positron emission tomography and autopsy studies show reduced levels of striatal dopamine (DA), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), dopamine transporter (DAT), and vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT-2) [37], [40], [44], [73], [78]. Serotonin transporter (SERT) density is also reduced [68]. In chronic MA users, monoamine transporter changes correlate with cognitive/memory impairments [37], [73], including impairments of recall, manipulation of information, verbal and non-verbal fluency, attention, and executive function [27], [28], [33], [38], [51], [69].

Acute high-dose treatment of rats with MA results in a pattern of neurotoxicity resembling that described in human chronic MA abuse. For example, a so-called neurotoxic/binge dosing paradigm in rats results in hyperthermia [12], [14], [25], [31], neostriatal reactive gliosis based on increased expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) [12], [25], [31], and microgliosis [42] based on increased expression of antibodies against the CD11b receptor. Hyperthermia, increased GFAP, argyrophilia by silver staining, and microgliosis are also seen in MA-treated mice given a neurotoxic dosing regimen [23], [55], [56], [57], [69], [70]. Cell death (via increased TUNEL staining) in the striatum and hippocampus of mice following high dose MA has also been reported [19].

In rats, a neurotoxic MA treatment regimen also causes DA and 5-HT reductions in the striatum and 5-HT reductions in the hippocampus [11], [12], [15], [25], [31], [58], [76] with partial recovery over time [24]. Reductions have been observed in striatal DAT [64], TH activity [41], and VMAT-2 [22], as well as hippocampal reductions in SERT [64] and tryptophan hydroxylase activity [41]. Similarly in mice, a neurotoxic dosing regimen of MA causes reductions in TH, DA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), homovanillic acid (HVA), and DAT binding in striatum [36], [47] and 5-HT, DA, and HVA reductions in forebrain regions [23].

Binge/neurotoxic MA treatment regimens in rats are reported to also affect behavior. For example, a MA dosing regimen that caused DA, 5-HT, and/or DAT reductions and/or GFAP increases resulted in impaired novel object recognition and egocentric learning, but only minor reductions in locomotor activity [31], [43], [76]. In terms of spatial learning, either no [31], [64] or very small transient deficits [24] are reported.

Much less is known about behavioral effects in mice following a binge/neurotoxic regimen of MA. MA-induced dopaminergic reductions are associated with impaired conditioned place preference to cocaine and MA in Swiss Webster mice; responses which were ameliorated by N-acetylcysteine treatment [1], [2]. Otherwise, there are no studies in mice of the behavioral consequences of neurotoxic/monoamine-depleting dosing regimens of MA. For example, there are no experiments examining the effects of a binge/neurotoxic dosing regimen on spatial, egocentric, or novel object learning in mice, or on the acoustic startle response (ASR), and/or sensory gating using prepulse inhibition (PPI). Nor could experiments be identified of this kind in mice on locomotor activity in response to an acute locomotor-stimulating challenge dose of MA after prior treatment with a neurotoxic dosing regimen of MA.

The objective of the present experiment was to determine whether a binge/neurotoxic regimen of MA given to C57BL/6 mice produces patterns of behavioral changes similar to those in rats, since mice offer advantages in terms of genetic manipulations that might be useful in testing future mechanistic hypotheses if the mouse is similarly sensitive. Our model was the well-established mouse model of O'Callaghan and Miller [56], [57], [70], [71].

Section snippets

Subjects and conditions

Adult male C57BL/6 N (Crl) mice (∼ 60 days of age) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Raleigh, NC) and singly housed in polycarbonate cages for 6 days prior to experimentation. Mice were maintained on a 14 h light:10 h dark (lights on at 600 h) schedule in a vivarium with food and water freely available (except during drug treatment). Protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The vivarium is accredited by the Association for the Assessment and

Body weight and temperature

There were no significant effects of treatment on body weight between SAL and MA-treated animals during or after dosing (not shown). For body temperature, there were significant effects of treatment and treatment × time. The treatment × time interaction showed that animals treated with MA had higher body temperatures beginning 60 min after the first dose and continuing throughout the treatment period and lasting until 12 h later compared to SAL controls (Fig. 1).

GFAP

Neostriatal astrogliosis 72 h post

Discussion

The data provided in the present experiments demonstrate that similar neurochemical and physiological effects following MA treatment may be observed in mice as are seen in rats after a neurotoxic dosing regimen [8], [9], [11], [29], [30], [31], [32], [64], [75]. Both rats and mice show increased body temperature and GFAP levels following MA treatment, along with reductions in brain monoamines. However, in terms of behavioral effects, rats and mice differ (at least in so far as egocentric and

Conclusion

C57BL/6 mice, while suitable for investigating the neurochemical/neurotoxic effects of a neurotoxic regimen of MA exposure, are less well suited for studying the behavioral consequences. Mice do not show the same types of behavioral effects as seen in rats even following similar doses and comparable reductions in monoamine levels.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest for these data.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by NIH grant DA006733, and a Scottish Right Fellowship and training grant ES07051. Sources were not involved in study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in the writing of the report.

References (80)

  • J. He et al.

    The effects of chronic administration of quetiapine on the methamphetamine-induced recognition memory impairment and dopaminergic terminal deficit in rats

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2006)
  • Y. Itzhak et al.

    Methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity in mice: long-lasting sensitization to the locomotor stimulation and desensitization to the rewarding effects of methamphetamine

    Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • H. Kamei et al.

    Repeated methamphetamine treatment impairs recognition memory through a failure of novelty-induced ERK1/2 activation in the prefrontal cortex of mice

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • M.J. LaVoie et al.

    Microglial activation precedes dopamine terminal pathology in methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity

    Exp. Neurol.

    (2004)
  • D.B. Miller et al.

    Elevated environmental temperature and methamphetamine neurotoxicity

    Environ. Res.

    (2003)
  • N. Mitra et al.

    Dissociation of serotoninergic and dopaminergic components in acute effects of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydropyridine in mice

    Brain Res. Bull.

    (1992)
  • K.P. Mohanakumar et al.

    Neuroprotection by sodium salicylate against 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydropyridine-induced neurotoxicity

    Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • T. Ott et al.

    The effect of methamphetamine on the norepinephrine and 5-hydroxytryptamine contents in eleven rat brain regions

    Brain Res.

    (1971)
  • E. Petroske et al.

    Mouse model of Parkinsonism: a comparison between subacute MPTP and chronic MPTP/probenecid treatment

    Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • G. Rozas et al.

    Sprouting of the serotonergic afferents into striatum after selective lesion of the dopaminergic system by MPTP in adult mice

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1998)
  • G. Rozas et al.

    The overall rod performance test in the MPTP-treated-mouse model of Parkinsonism

    J. Neurosci. Methods

    (1998)
  • R. Salo et al.

    Attentional control and brain metabolite levels in methamphetamine abusers

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • M. Sedelis et al.

    Behavioral phenotyping of the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2001)
  • Y. Sekine et al.

    Metabolite alterations in basal ganglia associated with methamphetamine-related psychiatric symptoms. A proton MRS study

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2002)
  • D.M. Thomas et al.

    Microglial activation is a pharmacologically specific marker for the neurotoxic amphetamines

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2004)
  • C.V. Vorhees

    Maze learning in rats: a comparison of performance in two water mazes in progeny prenatally exposed to different doses of phenytoin

    Neurotoxicol. Teratol.

    (1987)
  • G.L. Willis et al.

    Histochemical, biochemical and behavioural consequences of MPTP treatment in C-57 black mice

    Brain Res.

    (1987)
  • C.F. Wu et al.

    Protective effects of pseudoginsenoside-F11 on methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in mice

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (2003)
  • C. Achat-Mendes et al.

    Differential effects of amphetamines-induced neurotoxicity on appetitive and aversive Pavlovian conditioning in mice

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2005)
  • C. Achat-Mendes et al.

    Impairment in consolidation of learned place preference following dopaminergic neurotoxicity in mice is ameliorated by N-acetylcysteine but not D1 and D2 dopamine receptor agonists

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2007)
  • S.F. Ali et al.

    Methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic toxicity in mice. Role of environmental temperature and pharmacological agents

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1996)
  • S. Arai et al.

    GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen improves methamphetamine-induced cognitive deficit in mice

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2008)
  • G.R. Barker et al.

    The different effects on recognition memory of perirhinal kainate and NMDA glutamate receptor antagonism: implications for underlying plasticity mechanisms

    J. Neurosci.

    (2006)
  • A.M. Belcher et al.

    Methamphetamine influences on recognition memory: comparison of escalating and single-day dosing regimens

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2008)
  • A.M. Belcher et al.

    Impaired object recognition memory following methamphetamine, but not p-chloroamphetamine- or d-amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2005)
  • A.M. Belcher et al.

    Impaired object recognition memory following methamphetamine, but not p-chloroamphetamine- or d-amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2005)
  • H.W. Broening et al.

    Methamphetamine selectively damages dopaminergic innervation to the nucleus accumbens core while sparing the shell

    Synapse

    (1997)
  • M.W. Brown et al.

    Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • P.L. Brown et al.

    Brain hyperthermia is induced by methamphetamine and exacerbated by social interaction

    J. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • L. Chang et al.

    Structural and metabolic brain changes in the striatum associated with methamphetamine abuse

    Addiction

    (2007)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Role of dopamine D1 receptor in 3-fluoromethamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in mice

      2018, Neurochemistry International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Clinical evidences also indicated that the relationship between motor performance and MA-induced psychiatric effects in adolescent abusers (King et al., 2010; Moratalla et al., 2017). This behavioral losses may result from impaired dopaminergic system (Grace et al., 2010). Previous reports demonstrated that a possible correlation between a reduction in behavioral activity and the degree of striatal DA loss (Lenard and Beer, 1975; Jung et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text