The differential gene expression profiles of proximal and distal muscle groups are altered in pre-pathological dysferlin-deficient mice
Introduction
Microarray analysis as a tool to study muscular dystrophy has been used in an increasing number of studies in both patients and animal models with mutations in a variety of different muscular dystrophy associated genes. These studies have identified some secondary changes, which appear to be common to muscular dystrophy in general. The compilation of particular expression profiles from patients and animal models of specific types of muscular dystrophy may eventually delineate reproducible ‘molecular signatures’ of disease.
While it is well recognised that a characteristic and subtly different pattern of muscle involvement can be observed in various forms of muscular dystrophy, the mechanism by which some muscles are apparently more or less susceptible to the effects of the underlying mutation remains entirely unknown. One possibility is that a broad range of normal expression profiles in different skeletal muscle groups might condition their response to disease. If the patterns of gene expression in these muscle groups responded differently to the presence of a muscular dystrophy associated mutation, this would provide support for this hypothesis.
Dysferlinopathy (MIM*603009) is a good model of variability in muscular dystrophy. Mutations in dysferlin give rise to a number of clinically distinct presentations including a proximal, limb-girdle form of muscular dystrophy and two forms of distal myopathy, Miyoshi myopathy (MM) and distal myopathy with anterior tibial involvement (DMAT) [1], [2]. A very highly selective pattern of muscle involvement is seen in individual affected patients and identical dysferlin mutations have been shown to cause a variable phenotype within the same family or population group [2], [3]. However no genetic variants, which modify this phenotype are currently known. This variable but selective muscle involvement in dysferlinopathy suggests that it can act as a paradigm for understanding selectivity of muscle involvement in muscular dystrophies in general. Due to the obvious barriers to studying different human muscle groups we chose to study gene expression patterns in two muscle groups in a new mouse model of dysferlinopathy and its matched wildtype strain.
The SJL mouse strain, a well characterised model of dysferlinopathy, has a number of phenotypes unrelated to the dysferlin mutation. Since SJL descends from a wild-derived strain of Swiss mice which are genetically distinct from the common laboratory mouse [4], [5], [6] there is not an appropriate control strain available. In order to overcome these disadvantages we transferred the dysferlin mutation from SJL onto C57BL/10 by repeated backcrossing. Affected mice develop a muscular dystrophy which appears comparable to human dysferlinopathy and shows more severe pathological changes in the affected limb muscles than the SJL strain.
We have used oligonucleotide microarray analysis to demonstrate that gene expression indeed varies in the proximal and distal musculature of wildtype mice and that dysferlin deficiency even at a prepathological stage alters this pattern. Changes in gene expression in the mutant animals show some overlap with previously reported studies of muscular dystrophy, indicating that changes at the transcript level are an early marker of the dystrophic process.
Section snippets
Animals
The dysferlin mutation from SJL was detected by PCR using standard techniques as previously described [5]. C57BL/10.SJL-Dysf mice were generated by repeatedly backcrossing the dysferlin mutation from the SJL strain onto C57BL10ScSnHim. Offspring of N2- and all further generations were genotyped for the dysferlin mutation and only heterozygous animals were used for breeding. To obtain homozygous animals to be used for experiments, offspring from generations N8 and N9 were mated with littermates.
Characterisation of C57BL/10.SJL-Dysf mice
Dysferlin deficient SJL/HanHim mice were crossed to C57BL/10JHim and repeatedly backcrossed to C57BL/10. Following more than ten generations of backcrossing this strain should be more than 99.5% homozygous for C57BL/10 alleles and was therefore designated C57BL/10.SJL-Dysf. Very few dystrophic changes and no obvious inflammatory infiltrates could be detected in either proximal or distal muscles from the C57BL/10.SJL-Dysf animals at 21 days of age (Fig. 1A and B), but significant muscle
Discussion
It has been suggested that baseline transcriptional differences between wild type muscle groups may be a determinant of muscular dystrophy phenotypes [20]. There is increasing evidence that there are muscle group-specific transcriptomes and that anatomically distinct skeletal muscles may be much more different than has been previously appreciated [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. Our hypothesis was that muscle specific transcriptomes might react differently in the presence of a disease associated
Summary and conclusions
This study has shown that considerable differences exist in the baseline expression profile between proximal and distal muscle groups, despite similar fibre type composition and histological appearance. In fact, greater disparity in expression was detected between wild-type proximal and distal than between the mutant and wild-type proximal muscles. It is likely that the differences we detected in the baseline transcription probably represent only a subset of the actual transcriptome
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out with financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PO 699/2-1 to M.v.d.H.). We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Muscular Dystrophy Campaign (UK), Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals Special Trustees, Association Francais contre les Myopathies and the Austrian Muscle Research Found (F.O., R.E.B). Many thanks to Alison Trainer for critical reading of the manuscript and to Richard Charlton for technical assistance.
References (49)
- et al.
Validation of array-based gene expression profiles by real-time (kinetic) RT-PCR
J Mol Diagn
(2001) - et al.
Prominent inflammatory changes on muscle biopsy in patients with Miyoshi myopathy
Neuromuscul Disord
(1999) - et al.
Muscle inflammation and MHC class I up-regulation in muscular dystrophy with lack of dysferlin: an immunopathological study
J Neuroimmunol
(2003) - et al.
Dysferlin interacts with annexins A1 and A2 and mediates sarcolemmal wound-healing
J Biol Chem
(2003) - et al.
Secondary reduction in calpain 3 expression in patients with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B and miyoshi myopathy (primary dysferlinopathies)
Neuromuscul Disord
(2000) - et al.
Steroids in duchenne muscular dystrophy: from clinical trials to genomic research
Neuromuscul Disord
(2002) - et al.
Muscle LIM protein, a novel essential regulator of myogenesis, promotes myogenic differentiation
Cell
(1994) - et al.
The nuclear lamina and inherited disease
Trends Cell Biol
(2002) - et al.
Large-scale analysis of differential gene expression in the hindlimb muscles and diaphragm of mdx mouse
Biochim Biophys Acta
(2000) - et al.
Expression profiling in stably regenerating skeletal muscle of dystrophin-deficient mdx mice
Neuromuscul Disord
(2002)
Microarray analysis of normal and dystrophic skeletal muscle
Int J Dev Neurosci
Expression of calcium-binding proteins MRP8 and MRP14 in inflammatory muscle diseases
Am J Pathol
Dysferlin, a novel skeletal muscle gene, is mutated in miyoshi myopathy and limb girdle muscular dystrophy
Nat Genet
Identical mutation in patients with limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B or miyoshi myopathy suggests a role for modifier gene(s)
Hum Mol Genet
Muscular dystrophy due to dysferlin deficiency in libyan jews, clinical and genetic features
Brain
Immunological disorders in SJL mice
Dysferlin deletion in SJL mice (SJL-Dysf) defines a natural model for limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2B
Nat Genet
Cloning of the mouse dysferlin gene and genomic characterisation of the SJL-dysf mutation
NeuroReport
The lightcycler: a microvolume multisample fluorimeter with rapid temperature control
Biotechniques
Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification
Biotechniques
Quantification of low-copy transcripts by continuous SYBR green I monitoring during amplification
Biotechniques
Clinical course in 30 dysferlinopathy patients: relevance of fiber type regenerative process and inflammatory response
Neurology
A chronic inflammatory response dominates the skeletal muscle molecular signature in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice
Hum Mol Genet
Defective membrane repair in dysferlin-deficient muscular dystrophy
Nature
Cited by (38)
Muscle Lim Protein and myosin binding protein C form a complex regulating muscle differentiation
2017, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell ResearchMolecular cloning, characterization and tissue specificity of the expression of the ovine CSRP2 and CSRP3 genes from Small-tail Han sheep (Ovis aries)
2016, GeneCitation Excerpt :CRP3 is down-regulated in adult skeletal muscle and is re-induced by denervation. CSRP3 gene mutations that result in abnormal CRP3 expression have been identified in skeletal myopathies (Winokur et al., 2003; von der Hagen et al., 2005; Sanoudou et al., 2006). Recent studies have discovered an alternative splice variant of CSRP3 gene; the resulting novel CRP3 protein isoform acts as a negative regulator of myotube formation, has a distinct expression pattern in neuromuscular disease and has direct roles in muscle differentiation (Felkin et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2012; Vafiadaki et al., 2014).
Differential Isoform Expression and Selective Muscle Involvement in Muscular Dystrophies
2015, American Journal of PathologyMuscle LIM Protein: Master regulator of cardiac and skeletal muscle functions
2015, GeneCitation Excerpt :This decline in oligomeric, cytoplasmic, MLP is hypothesized to impair the cardiomyocyte mechanical sensor mechanism, a defect known to disrupt cardiac function to give rise to heart disease (Boateng et al., 2007). Beyond heart disease, deregulation of MLP levels has also been reported in different skeletal muscle diseases, including facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, nemaline myopathy and limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B (Winokur et al., 2003; von der Hagen et al., 2005; Sanoudou et al., 2006). The reason and implications of these expression changes remain largely unknown; they could be an unsuccessful compensatory mechanism against the widespread structural disarray encountered in the affected skeletal muscles, or a reflection of the impaired myogenic process that is sometimes observed.
Muscular dystrophy in dysferlin-deficient mouse models
2013, Neuromuscular DisordersCitation Excerpt :SJL/J mice were backcrossed onto the C57BL/10 background [14]. Despite initial claims of a more severe phenotype [62], the dystrophy in these B10.SJL-Dysfim/AwaJ mice (Table 1) appears to be very similar to the observed pathology in SJL/J. Dysferlin protein levels were also similar, 20–30% of control levels in neonatal muscle and 10% in adults (unpublished), compared with 15% in adult SJL/J muscle [14]. CK levels are also elevated [16], contrary to previous reports documenting normal serum CK but elevated pyruvate kinase levels [62].