Bone preparation at the KCCAMS laboratory

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.061Get rights and content

Abstract

Collagen purification by ultrafiltration [1] is becoming widely accepted as a superior 14C sample preparation method for removing environmental contamination from archaeological bone. We present an overview of bone sample preparation methods used at the KCCAMS laboratory, UC Irvine. Methods development data are also discussed, including results of tests of gelatinization temperature, evaluation of 10 kDa vs. 30 kDa molecular weight (MW) ultrafiltration, improvements to ultrafilter cleaning methods, tests of ultrafilter memory, and ultrafilter glycerin contamination. These tests were not intended to be exhaustive, but rather to show how standard procedures can be validated and improved with relatively little effort.

Introduction

Radiocarbon dating of bone is particularly difficult because the porous and easily alterable apatite matrix of bone allows potential contamination of bone collagen by environmentally mobile soil carbon. Brown et al. [1] developed a modified Longin method using ultrafiltration to select large protein fragments (hereafter referred to operationally as “collagen”) most likely to be uncontaminated. This technique has been used in North America for over 20 years (all bone samples prepared by the RIDDL group [1], and subsequently at the CAMS/LLNL and UC Irvine AMS labs, have been prepared with this technique) and is now also being used extensively by researchers at Oxford [2]. Here we describe the technique as used at the UCI-KCCAMS lab and report on tests to maximize collagen yields and to characterize process blanks.

Section snippets

Methodology

Collagen production at the UCI-KCCAMS lab follows a modified Longin method [1]. Approximately 100 mg of bone is manually cleaned and crushed to particles roughly 2 mm in size. The sample is then decalcified in 0.5 N HCl for 24–36 h. After rinsing with Milli-Q water to neutral pH, the sample is hydrolyzed with 0.01 N HCl at 60 °C for 8–12 h. The high MW fraction of the gelatin solution is selected using precleaned 30 kDa Centriprep ultrafilters (Fisher Scientific). The sample is ultrafiltered twice,

Decalcification

Acid strength and decalcification time should be optimized in order to maximize collagen yield. Collagen yield decreases strongly with increasing acid strength and HCl strengths above 1 N should not be used (Fig. 1). Decalcification time is highly dependant on bone preservation state and the size of bone pieces chosen (Fig. 2). We use a 24–36 h decalcification period, with visual inspection to check for completion. Decalcification temperature appears to have little effect on the yield (Fig. 2).

Gelatinization

Conclusions

These and similar samples tests can help to validate bone preparation procedures and can point the way to further improvements such as the rapid gelatinization developed by Semal and Orban [4]. A significant obstacle in such tests has been the lack of a well characterized “dirty bone” standard that is known to be seriously contaminated. We urge all laboratories undertaking bone preparation to be aware of the need for suitably large samples of such material and to report them to the community if

References (7)

  • P. Semal et al.

    J. Arch. Sci.

    (1995)
  • T.A. Brown et al.

    Radiocarbon

    (1988)
  • C.B. Ramsey et al.

    Radiocarbon

    (2004)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (82)

  • Impact of varying HCl concentrations on the δ<sup>15</sup>N values of human rib bones used for dietary reconstruction

    2021, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    Concerning the HCl concentration, in 2010, Pestle observed no difference in %C, %N, atomic ratio of carbon to nitrogen (C:N), δ13C and δ15N values obtained from four protocols with varying HCl concentration and duration (n = 2): 0.2 M for 24 h, 0.1 M for 48 and 72 h, and 0.05 M for 120 h, concluding that stronger HCl concentrations should be used to reduce acidification time and increase productivity. Yet, stronger acids than 1 M should not be used as demonstrated by Beaumont and colleagues (2010, Fig. 1). The complete Sealy et al. (1986) method recommends soaking samples in 0.125 M NaOH for 20 h in order to remove humic acid after bone demineralization.

  • Minimally invasive bone biopsies of fully wrapped mummies guided by computed tomography and fibre-optic endoscopy: Methods and suggested guidelines

    2020, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    This amount is especially recommended in the case of ancient Egyptian material as Egyptian samples commonly underwent an additional cleaning step with benzene to remove contamination with bitumen based embalming substances (Aufderheide et al., 2004). For soft tissue, a minimum amount of about 100 mg could be enough (Beaumont et al., 2010). As mentioned above, the combination of CT imaging and fibre-optic endoscopy for minimal invasive sampling of fully wrapped mummies has the major advantage that it allows the detection of ways of access to the inner mummy parts.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Address: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90021, USA.

View full text