Elsevier

Neurobiology of Aging

Volume 49, January 2017, Pages 217.e1-217.e4
Neurobiology of Aging

Genetic report abstract
Negative results
Evaluation of the interaction between LRRK2 and PARK16 loci in determining risk of Parkinson's disease: analysis of a large multicenter study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.09.022Get rights and content

Abstract

A recent study MacLeod et al. has shown that an interaction between variants at the LRRK2 and PARK16 loci influences risk of development of Parkinson's disease (PD). Our study examines the proposed interaction between LRRK2 and PARK16 variants in modifying PD risk using a large multicenter series of PD patients (7715) and controls (8261) from sites participating in the Genetic Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease Consortium. Our data does not support a strong direct interaction between LRRK2 and PARK16 variants; however, given the role of retromer and lysosomal pathways in PD, further studies are warranted.

Introduction

Genetic discoveries made over the years either by using linkage, array, and/or exome-based approaches have helped in advancing our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings of Parkinson's disease (PD) (International Parkinson Disease Genomics Consortium et al., 2011, Lesage and Brice, 2009, Trinh and Farrer, 2013). As we discover new loci relevant to idiopathic PD pathogenesis, it has become imperative to also understand the gene–gene interaction effect in modulating PD risk in population (see Supplementary Information) (Elbaz et al., 2011). Although the results of most gene–gene interactions studies in PD to date have pointed toward independent effects for PD susceptibility variants, an exception to this has been an assessment of functional-genetic interaction between the LRRK2 and PARK16 loci in which overexpression of RAB7L1, a candidate gene for PARK16 locus, reversed the effects of the LRRK2 mutation and rescued the phenotypes (MacLeod et al., 2013). Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the interaction between several different LRRK2 and PARK16 variants in determining PD risk using a Caucasian series with more than 10,000 subjects from 14 different centers, and an Asian series with more than 5000 subjects from 5 different centers.

Section snippets

Methods

The Genetic Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease (GEoPD) consortium includes investigators from 59 sites, across 30 countries and 6 continents, as of 2016. A total of 19 sites representing 17 countries and 4 continents agreed to contribute DNA samples and clinical data for the present study. In total, 15,976 subjects were included in this study, divided into a Caucasian series (5769 PD patients, 4988 controls) and an Asian series (1946 PD patients, 3273 controls). We selected 5 SNPs for the

Results

Of the 10 interactions that were examined between the PARK16 and LRRK2 variants, nonsignificant evidence of gene–gene interaction was observed between LRRK2 rs1491942 and PARK16 rs11240572 in the combined series (interaction OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.74–1.01, p = 0.07, Supplementary Table 1). PARK16 rs11240572 appeared to have no effect on PD risk for individuals with the common GG genotype for LRRK2 rs1491942, but a slight protective effect for those with GC and CC LRRK2 rs1491942 genotypes (see 

Discussion

The identification of genetic mutations in genes linked to familial forms of PD (e.g., LRRK2, VPS35, and DNAJC13), and genetic variability within the PARK16 locus in genome wide association studies strongly implicates the role of retromer and lysosomal pathway in PD pathogenesis (Heckman et al., 2014, Soto-Ortolaza et al., 2013). Therefore, to understand the impact of interaction in world-wide populations, we performed a large multicenter study to assess the genetic evidence of interaction

Disclosure statement

The institution of L. Wang and M. Sharma is financially supported by the Courage-PD, an EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND) project. The project is supported through the following funding organizations under the aegis of JPND-www.jpnd.eu: the Medical Research Council, United Kingdom, the French National Research Agency, the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, the Italian Ministry of Health/Ministry of Education, the Israeli Ministry of Health, the

Acknowledgements

The Mayo Clinic Jacksonville is a Morris K. Udall Center of Excellence in Parkinson's Disease Research (grant number P50 NS072187) and was supported by the gift from the family of Carl Edward Bolch, Jr., and Susan Bass Bolch (RJU, ZKW, OAR). Owen A. Ross, PhD, acknowledges funding support from the National Institutes of Health (grant number R01 NS78086). M. J. Farrer reports grants from the Canadian Federal Government, Cunhill Foundation, BC Leading Edge Endowment, during the conduct of the

References (8)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (6)

  • LRRK2: Genetic mechanisms vs genetic subtypes

    2023, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
  • What have we learned from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in Parkinson's disease?

    2022, Ageing Research Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recognising this unmet need to diversify genomic research in PD, large multi-national consortia have recently initiated an effort to catalogue genomic diversity (International Parkinson Disease Genomics Consortium (IPDGC), 2020). These include the LARGE-PD consortium (Latin American Research Consortium on the Genetics of Parkinson’s Disease), (Zabetian and Mata, 2017) the Luxembourg-German-Indian Alliance on Neurodegenerative diseases (Lux-GIANT)106, or recent efforts in Southeast Asia, (Foo et al., 2017) China, and Africa spearheaded by the International Parkinson Disease Genomics Consortium98 (IPDGC) and the Genetic Epidemiology of Parkinson disease (GEoPD) consortium (Wang et al., 2017). Such initiatives are making significant progress in integrating ethnic diversity in PD GWAS.

View full text