ReviewDo initial responses to drugs predict future use or abuse?
Highlights
► We review evidence that initial responses to abused drugs predict progression in use. ► We consider findings with humans, as well as nonhumans, and several classes of drugs. ► Some genetic factors influence both initial drug responses and drug consumption. ► Procedures assessing comparable drug responses in humans and nonhumans are needed.
Introduction
Most drugs of abuse produce subjective feelings of well-being and euphoria in humans, which are thought to contribute to the drug's potential to be used or abused (de Wit and Griffiths, 1991, Fischman and Foltin, 1991). Indeed, drug-induced changes in mood or subjective state have long been the primary indicator of abuse potential used by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to assess the likelihood of abuse for new medications (Jasinski, 1991; FDA guidelines in Balster and Bigelow, 2003, Carter and Griffiths, 2009). Drugs that produce euphoria are more likely to be abused than drugs that fail to produce euphoria, and individuals who report experiencing more positive effects from a drug are more likely to use the drug again. However, the extent to which either the quality or magnitude of responses to the first few exposures to a drug are indicators of the individual's likelihood of continued use, or in the longer term to abuse or dependence, remains to be determined. The full clinical manifestation of drug dependence results from dynamic changes that occur only after repeated administration of the drug, including alterations related to learning, tolerance, cognitive function, stress, sensitization and complex neuroadaptations underlying these phenomena (Everitt et al., 2008). Thus, the relationship between early subjective responses and fully developed dependence is at best indirect (Wagner and Anthony, 2002). Yet, there is evidence that an individual's initial responses to drugs may constitute one factor contributing to the risk for future abuse or dependence. This is of particular interest because of the possibility that genetic factors may influence these initial responses, and thus impart vulnerability to future use.
Section snippets
Individual differences in responses to drugs
Individuals may differ in their responses to drugs on several dimensions, any of which may influence subsequent use. Individuals may differ in how the drug makes them feel (i.e., the subjective self-reported states in humans; discriminative stimulus effects in animals), how it affects physiological processes (e.g., heart rate; body temperature) or how it affects their behavior (e.g., risk-taking behavior in humans; locomotor activation or depression in rodents). Further, responses to drugs may
Specific examples of acute responses predicting use or abuse
The extent to which sensitivity to acute drug effects in humans predicts the trajectory of drug use outside the laboratory remains to be determined. Clearly, a multitude of other factors contribute to the etiology of drug abuse and dependence, including non-drug-related factors such as stress and impulsivity, and drug factors that only come into play after repeated ingestion of the drug in a specific context such as conditioning, tolerance and sensitization (Everitt et al., 2008). Recognizing
Conclusions
So, do initial responses to drugs predict future use or abuse? We have reviewed the limited evidence that early responses to drugs predict use or abuse in humans and nonhumans. First, we confirm that there are marked individual differences in initial acute responses to drugs, and some of these differences are genetic. Second, we confirm that certain direct effects of drugs appear to be protective against future use, such as, in humans, the flushing response to alcohol and perhaps the anxiety
Acknowledgments
The authors were supported by DA02812 (HdW), DA032015 (HdW), AA010760 (TP), AA016655 (TP), DA018165 (TP), and the Department of Veterans Affairs (TP). John Crabbe, Chris-Ellyn Johanson, Matthew Kirkpatrick, James Zacny and Emma Childs provided valuable comments on the manuscript.
References (211)
Alcohol stimulates motor activity in selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP), but not in Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP), rats
Alcohol
(2001)Possible involvement of acetaldehyde, norepinephrine and their tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives in the regulation of ethanol self-administration
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(1977)- et al.
Guidelines and methodological reviews concerning drug abuse liability assessment
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2003) SR-141716A-induced stimulation of locomotor activity. A structure–activity relationship study
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
(2002)Genetic dissociation of multiple morphine effects among C57BL/6J, DBA/2J and C3H/HeJ inbred mouse strains
Physiology and Behavior
(1989)Sensitivity to ethanol-induced motor incoordination in FAST and SLOW selectively bred mice
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
(2000)Rat strain differences in nicotine self-administration using an unlimited access paradigm
Brain Research
(2002)- et al.
Principles of laboratory assessment of drug abuse liability and implications for clinical development
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2009) - et al.
Relationship between subjective effects and drug preferences: ethanol and diazepam
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(1994) Mice genetically selected for differences in open-field activity after ethanol
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
(1987)