The Turkish version of the Patient Safety Competency Self-Evaluation Tool: A validity and reliability study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103229Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim

To test the validity and reliability of the Patient Safety Competency Self-Evaluation Tool in Turkish, which was developed to evaluate the patient safety competencies of nursing students.

Background

In nursing education, it is crucial to provide students with the necessary professional knowledge and skills as well as appropriate attitudes in certain subjects. It is essential to address frequently encountered problems, to train nurses who can be aware of patient safety and improve the quality of nursing education. A valid and reliable measurement tool is needed to evaluate nursing students' current patient safety knowledge, skills and attitudes and review the curriculum and learning objectives in this context.

Design

This is a validation study with a cross-sectional design.

Methods

The study sample consisted of 417 third and fourth-grade nursing students studying at two universities in Istanbul and volunteered to participate in the research. The study used the Turkish version of the Patient Safety Competency Self-Evaluation Tool was used for data collection. Content validity, construct validity, stability and reliability tests were performed. Data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS programs. Ethics committee approval and permission from the institutions were obtained.

Results

Nursing students’ mean age was 21.98 (SD = 1.17). The Scope Validity Index of the scale was calculated as 0.97. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis performed in the original structure consisting of three dimensions, 12 factors and 41 items, it was found that all items were in the sub-dimensions of the original scale and factor loads were between 0.168 and 0.918. Four models were tested in confirmatory factor analysis and Model 4 had the best-fit indices. They were calculated as: χ2/df = 2.38, RMSEA = 0.06 and CFI = 0.91 for Model 4. Cronbach's alpha value of the total scale was 0.941 and ranged between 0.642 and 0.932 in its sub-dimensions.

Conclusion

The Turkish version of the Patient Safety Competency Self-Evaluation Tool is valid and reliable to measure nursing students’ patient safety competencies.

Introduction

Adverse events are estimated to be the third leading cause of death in developed countries (Makary and Daniel, 2016). Furthermore, it is estimated that 10–25% of hospitalized patients experience preventable adverse events each year (Levett-Jones et al., 2020). For this reason, patient safety is an essential issue in healthcare services and draws attention worldwide (Lee et al., 2014, Taskiran et al., 2020).

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines patient safety as “the prevention of errors and adverse effects to patients associated with healthcare” (World Health Organization, 2017)(WHO, 2017). Nurses have a crucial role in ensuring and maintaining patient safety (Fisher and Kiernan, 2019, Levett-Jones et al., 2020). Compared with other healthcare professionals, nurses who interact with patients for a long time can recognize risk factors and conditions earlier (Tella et al., 2014). Therefore, nurses can support not only patient safety but also be effective in reducing errors. Ensuring patient safety is closely related to the development of a safety culture in health institutions. Therefore, it is essential to form a safety culture where healthcare professionals are well-trained and informed about patient safety (Kim, Lee, and Kim, 2021). Therefore, nursing graduates need to have the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes to identify and address factors that may endanger patient safety (Usher et al., 2017).

Section snippets

Background

The education of future healthcare professionals on patient safety competency is critical in providing quality and safe healthcare (Svitlica et al., 2021). Patient safety competency is critical and refers to the knowledge, skills and attitudes associated with patient safety (Lee et al., 2014). Knowledge, skills and attitudes that improve patient safety and facilitate learning from mistakes can be gained through education (Kong et al., 2019). Nursing schools, which are the institutions that

Study design

This is a validation study with a cross-sectional design.

Aim

This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the PSCSE tool in Turkish. For this purpose, answers to the following research questions were sought:

  • Is the PSCSE Turkish form valid in the sample of nursing students?

  • Is the PSCSE Turkish form reliable in the sample of nursing students?

Participants and setting

The research universe consisted of nursing students who continued their undergraduate education in two different universities (one public and one

Ethical considerations

Permission was obtained from the authors of the scale via e-mail to adapt the PSCSE into Turkish and conduct the validity and reliability study. Before starting data collection, ethics committee approval (dated 25.08.2016, numbered 2016/14) was obtained from the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of a Foundation University. Written institutional permissions were obtained from the universities where the research was conducted. Before applying the data collection tools, the participants were

Results

The results were presented under three main headings as participant characteristics, psychometric measurements and PSCSE scores of nursing students.

Validity and reliability

In the first step of the study, national and international literature and patient safety scales developed for nursing students were examined. Researchers decided to investigate the psychometric properties of the PSCSE developed by Lee et al. (2014) since it is closer to nursing education in Turkey in terms of content and scope. Also, the original scale was valid and reliable, widely used and adapted to different samples (Jang, 2013, Song and Jang, 2016).

In the adaptation process, the methods

Limitations

The third and fourth-grade nursing students from two universities, one public and one foundation, were included in this study. Therefore, the study's findings may have been affected by the differences in the nursing departments of these two universities, which should be taken into account when generalizing. PSCSE-Turkish is a student self-assessment tool. There may be differences between the level of competency students evaluate themselves and their actual level of competency. In addition, the

Conclusion and recommendations

In conclusion, it was evaluated that the PSCSE-Turkish form had good psychometric properties. In addition, it was determined that the PSCSE-Turkish scale, which includes their knowledge, skills and attitudes and consists of three dimensions, 12 factors and 41 items, is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate nursing students’ patient safety competencies. In light of these results, we recommend using the Turkish version of the PSCSE scale to measure nursing students' patient safety knowledge,

Funding sources

The authors did not use any source of funding from public or private institutions for performing this study.

Ethical approval

Ethics committee approval (dated 25.08.2016, numbered 2016/14) for the study was obtained from the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of a Foundation University.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Study design: GTE, AKHS, EU, MK. Data collection: GTE, MK, EU, AKHS. Data analysis: GTE, AKHS, EU, MK. Study supervision: GTE, AKHS, EU, MK. Manuscript writing: GTE, AKHS, EU, MK. Critical revisions for important intellectual content: GTE, AKHS, EU, MK.

Submission declaration

This study has not been published elsewhere before.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all students for participating in the study.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest between the authors.

References (51)

  • M. Mansour

    Factor analysis of nursing students’ perception of patient safety education

    Nurse Educ. Today

    (2015)
  • A. Steven et al.

    Patient safety in nursing education: contexts, tensions and feeling safe to learn

    Nurse Educ. Today

    (2014)
  • D.T. Sullivan et al.

    Assessing quality and safety competencies of graduating prelicensure nursing students

    Nurs. Outlook

    (2009)
  • B.B. Svitlica et al.

    Patient safety: knowledge and attitudes of medical and nursing students: cross-sectional study

    Nurse Educ. Pract.

    (2021)
  • G. Taskiran et al.

    Psychometric testing of the Turkish version of the health professional education in patient safety survey: H-PEPSSTR

    Nurse Educ. Pract.

    (2020)
  • K. Usher et al.

    Self-reported confidence in patient safety knowledge among Australian undergraduate nursing students: a multi-site cross-sectional survey study

    Int. J. Nurs. Stud.

    (2017)
  • A.A. Abdrbo

    Nursing informatics competencies among nursing students and their relationship to patient safety competencies: Knowledge, attitude and skills. CIN: Computers, Informatics

    Nursing

    (2015)
  • R. Alpar

    Applied Statistics and Validity-reliability: With Examples from Sports, Health and Educational Sciences

    (2012)
  • Hallmarks of quality and patient safety: recommended baccalaureate competencies and curricular guidelines to ensure high-quality and safe patient care

    J. Prof. Nurs.

    (2006)
  • American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN] (2013). AACN extends national nurse faculty development initiative...
  • M. Bianchi et al.

    Patient safety competencies in undergraduate nursing students: a rapid evidence assessment

    J. Adv. Nurs.

    (2016)
  • R.W. Brislin et al.
    (1973)
  • S.M. Cho et al.

    Patient safety culture associated with patient safety competencies among registered nurses

    J. Nurs. Scholarsh.

    (2018)
  • L. Ginsburg et al.

    The H-PEPSS: an instrument to measure health professionals’ perceptions of patient safety competence at entry into practice

    BMJ Qual. Saf.

    (2012)
  • J.F. Hair et al.

    Multivariate Data Analysis

    (2005)
  • Cited by (4)

    • Patient safety competencies of nursing students

      2023, Nurse Education Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Summated mean scores of the tool and each of the three subscales ranged between one and five, with higher scores indicating higher level of overall competence and competence in knowledge, skills and attitude. Cronbach's alpha of the total scale was 0.941 and ranged from 0.642 to 0.932 in its dimensions (Eskici et al., 2021). In our study, Cronbach's alpha of the total scale was 0.97 and ranged between 0.77 and 0.98 in its three dimensions.

    • Patient safety competence of nursing students and affecting factors

      2024, Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
    • Study on Reliability Science and Its Evaluation

      2023, AIP Conference Proceedings
    1

    Orcid ID: 0000-0001-8331-4897.

    2

    Orcid ID: 0000-0003-3811-5105.

    3

    Orcid ID: 0000-0002-2119-6175.

    4

    Orcid ID: 0000-0002-4478-7234.

    View full text