Original article
Validity and reliability of the Arabic quick disabilities of the arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH-Arabic)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102372Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Arabic QuickDASH is a unidimensional outcome measure.

  • Arabic QuickDASH has excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

  • Arabic QuickDASH is a valid measure of upper extremity activity limitation and symptoms.

Abstract

Background

The QuickDASH is a commonly used upper extremity region-specific outcome measure assessing activity limitation and symptoms. The Arabic version of QuickDASH is available in the official outcome measure website, but no prior studies have examined its psychometric properties.

Objective

To examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

Methods

Participants with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders were recruited (N = 109) using convenience sampling and completed the Arabic QuickDASH, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Global Assessment of Function, and RAND 36-item Health Survey in two testing sessions (2–7 days apart). The Arabic QuickDASH structural validity, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effect, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and construct validity were examined.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis indicated a one factor underlying the Arabic QuickDASH. The Arabic QuickDASH had Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 and ICC2.1 of 0.91 indicating excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. None of the participant reached the minimum or the maximum score. The scale's standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were 7.0 and 16.3. Five out of the six construct validity predefined hypotheses were supported by the results.

Conclusion

The Arabic QuickDASH is a unidimensional scale with excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability and acceptable measurement error. The Arabic Quick DASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure that can be used in Arabic speaking countries with Arabic patients suffering from various upper extremity activity limitations and symptoms.

Introduction

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand short version (Quick DASH) is a commonly used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) (Beaton et al., 2005). It is a short region-specific measure capturing important health-related construct (upper extremity activity limitation and symptoms) (Rudolf et al., 2012; Goldhahn et al., 2014; Ramiro et al., 2019) making it practical for busy clinicians where one scale is used with all upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders instead of using multiple joint-specific or disease-specific measures with different scoring methods and different interpretations (Chester et al., 2017; Dabija et al., 2019; Wormald et al., 2019). In a systematic review, Kennedy et al. indicated that the body of literature supports the psychometric properties of the QuickDASH (Kennedy et al., 2013). Additionally, the authors also indicated the need for studies with high methodological quality to examine the validity and reliability of QuickDASH adapted versions given the overall poor methodological quality of studies that examined the scale's adapted versions (Kennedy et al., 2013).

Kennedy et al. reviewed 11 adapted versions of the QuickDASH (Kennedy et al., 2013) and the number of QuickDASH adaptations are increasing in the literature given the scale's attractive features (Lee et al., 2013; Golicki et al., 2014; Ebrahimzadeh et al., 2015; Schønnemann and Eggers, 2016; Hammond et al., 2018; Cao et al., 2019; Da Silva et al., 2020). The longer version of the scale (DASH) has been translated into Arabic language and its content and face validity has been established (Alotaibi, 2010). The psychometric properties of the Arabic DASH were also examined in a study that established its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness (Alotaibi et al., 2016). The Arabic QuickDASH is currently available in the official DASH outcome measure website (http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/) and number of research studies have used it to examine the construct validity of other PROMs (Alsanawi et al., 2015; Arab Alkabeya et al., 2020) or for outcome assessment in observational and experimental studies (Alhanafy et al., 2018; Ashour et al., 2018; Alruthia et al., 2019) despite the lack of evidence to support its validity and reliability. Research studies are needed to examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic QuickDASH using sound methodology before the Arabic QuickDASH can be recommended for either clinical purposes or for research purposes.

The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic QuickDASH including structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity. We hypothesized that the Arabic QuickDASH 1) would have a unidimensional structure; 2) would demonstrate very good to excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, acceptable measurement error with no floor or ceiling effects; 3) would demonstrate evidence to support its construct validity as a measure of upper extremity activity limitation and symptoms.

Section snippets

Setting and participants

For the purpose of the current study, we recruited participants (≥18 years of age) with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Inability to read or understand Arabic, any neurological disorder, functional limitation due to spinal surgery, and cardiovascular or pulmonary disorders were the study's exclusion criteria. Using convenience sampling, participants were recruited from outpatient physical therapy departments. Ethical approval for the study was obtained and participants signed

Results

One hundred and nine patients with various upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders participated in the study and completed the outcome measures in the first visit (Table 1) (Table 2). Eighty participants (out of 109) also completed the outcome measures in the second visit. No missing items were observed in the Arabic QuickDASH.

Discussion

Consistent with our hypotheses, the Arabic QuickDASH demonstrated a unidimensional structure, had excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and acceptable measurement error with no evidence of any floor or ceiling issues. The Arabic QuickDASH also demonstrated evidence supporting its construct validity as a measure of upper extremity activity limitation and symptoms.

Exploratory factor analysis conducted in the current study indicated that the Arabic QuickDASH has a unidimensional

Conclusion

The Arabic QuickDASH demonstrated a unidimensional structure justifying summarizing the scale into one total score. The scale also showed excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability with acceptable measurement error and without signs of any floor or ceiling effects. The Arabic QuickDASH was a valid measure of upper extremity activity limitation and symptoms that could be used in daily clinical practice and for research purposes.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the College of Medicine institutional review board at King Saud University.

Declaration of competing interest

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The author extends his appreciation to the College of Applied Medical Sciences Research Center and the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this research.

References (52)

  • A.H. Alnahdi

    Measurement properties of the 15-item Arabic lower extremity functional scale

    Disabil. Rehabil.

    (2020)
  • A.H. Alnahdi et al.

    Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the lower extremity functional scale

    Disabil. Rehabil.

    (2016)
  • N.M. Alotaibi

    Cross-cultural adaptation process and pilot testing of the Arabic version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-Arabic)

    Hand Ther.

    (2010)
  • N.M. Alotaibi et al.

    Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Arabic version of the disability of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-Arabic)

    Disabil. Rehabil.

    (2016)
  • H.A. Alsanawi et al.

    Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the shoulder pain and disability index

    Int. J. Rehabil. Res.

    (2015)
  • H. Arab Alkabeya et al.

    The Arabic Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale-8 (ASES-8): a valid and reliable measure of evaluating self-efficacy in Palestinian patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Disabil. Rehabil.

    (2020)
  • A. Ashour et al.

    Functional outcome of open surgical A1 pulley release in diabetic and nondiabetic patients

    J. Orthop. Surg.

    (2018)
  • D.E. Beaton et al.

    Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2005)
  • M.E. Boeckstyns et al.

    Psychometric properties of two questionnaires in the context of total wrist arthroplasty

    Dan Med J

    (2014)
  • C.R. Budtz et al.

    Responsiveness and minimal important change for the quick-DASH in patients with shoulder disorders

    Health Qual. Life Outcome

    (2018)
  • S. Cao et al.

    Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

    Clin. Rheumatol.

    (2019)
  • R. Chester et al.

    The SPADI and QuickDASH are similarly responsive in patients undergoing physical therapy for shoulder pain

    J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.

    (2017)
  • S.J. Coons et al.

    Reliability of an Arabic version of the RAND-36 Health Survey and its equivalence to the US-English version

    Med. Care

    (1998)
  • D.I. Dabija et al.

    Which is the best outcome measure for rotator cuff tears?

    Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.

    (2019)
  • H.C.W. De Vet et al.

    Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide

    (2011)
  • M.H. Ebrahimzadeh et al.

    Validity and reliability of the Persian version of shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (Quick-DASH)

    Int. J. Prev. Med.

    (2015)
  • View full text