Original articleValidity and reliability of the Arabic quick disabilities of the arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH-Arabic)
Introduction
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand short version (Quick DASH) is a commonly used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) (Beaton et al., 2005). It is a short region-specific measure capturing important health-related construct (upper extremity activity limitation and symptoms) (Rudolf et al., 2012; Goldhahn et al., 2014; Ramiro et al., 2019) making it practical for busy clinicians where one scale is used with all upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders instead of using multiple joint-specific or disease-specific measures with different scoring methods and different interpretations (Chester et al., 2017; Dabija et al., 2019; Wormald et al., 2019). In a systematic review, Kennedy et al. indicated that the body of literature supports the psychometric properties of the QuickDASH (Kennedy et al., 2013). Additionally, the authors also indicated the need for studies with high methodological quality to examine the validity and reliability of QuickDASH adapted versions given the overall poor methodological quality of studies that examined the scale's adapted versions (Kennedy et al., 2013).
Kennedy et al. reviewed 11 adapted versions of the QuickDASH (Kennedy et al., 2013) and the number of QuickDASH adaptations are increasing in the literature given the scale's attractive features (Lee et al., 2013; Golicki et al., 2014; Ebrahimzadeh et al., 2015; Schønnemann and Eggers, 2016; Hammond et al., 2018; Cao et al., 2019; Da Silva et al., 2020). The longer version of the scale (DASH) has been translated into Arabic language and its content and face validity has been established (Alotaibi, 2010). The psychometric properties of the Arabic DASH were also examined in a study that established its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness (Alotaibi et al., 2016). The Arabic QuickDASH is currently available in the official DASH outcome measure website (http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/) and number of research studies have used it to examine the construct validity of other PROMs (Alsanawi et al., 2015; Arab Alkabeya et al., 2020) or for outcome assessment in observational and experimental studies (Alhanafy et al., 2018; Ashour et al., 2018; Alruthia et al., 2019) despite the lack of evidence to support its validity and reliability. Research studies are needed to examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic QuickDASH using sound methodology before the Arabic QuickDASH can be recommended for either clinical purposes or for research purposes.
The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic QuickDASH including structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity. We hypothesized that the Arabic QuickDASH 1) would have a unidimensional structure; 2) would demonstrate very good to excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, acceptable measurement error with no floor or ceiling effects; 3) would demonstrate evidence to support its construct validity as a measure of upper extremity activity limitation and symptoms.
Section snippets
Setting and participants
For the purpose of the current study, we recruited participants (≥18 years of age) with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Inability to read or understand Arabic, any neurological disorder, functional limitation due to spinal surgery, and cardiovascular or pulmonary disorders were the study's exclusion criteria. Using convenience sampling, participants were recruited from outpatient physical therapy departments. Ethical approval for the study was obtained and participants signed
Results
One hundred and nine patients with various upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders participated in the study and completed the outcome measures in the first visit (Table 1) (Table 2). Eighty participants (out of 109) also completed the outcome measures in the second visit. No missing items were observed in the Arabic QuickDASH.
Discussion
Consistent with our hypotheses, the Arabic QuickDASH demonstrated a unidimensional structure, had excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and acceptable measurement error with no evidence of any floor or ceiling issues. The Arabic QuickDASH also demonstrated evidence supporting its construct validity as a measure of upper extremity activity limitation and symptoms.
Exploratory factor analysis conducted in the current study indicated that the Arabic QuickDASH has a unidimensional
Conclusion
The Arabic QuickDASH demonstrated a unidimensional structure justifying summarizing the scale into one total score. The scale also showed excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability with acceptable measurement error and without signs of any floor or ceiling effects. The Arabic QuickDASH was a valid measure of upper extremity activity limitation and symptoms that could be used in daily clinical practice and for research purposes.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the College of Medicine institutional review board at King Saud University.
Declaration of competing interest
The author reports no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The author extends his appreciation to the College of Applied Medical Sciences Research Center and the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this research.
References (52)
- et al.
Efficacy of acetaminophen versus ibuprofen for the management of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: randomized open-label study
Saudi Pharmaceut. J.
(2019) - et al.
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of Brazilian version of QuickDASH
Musculoskelet Sci Pract
(2020) - et al.
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders
Man. Ther.
(2009) - et al.
Psychometric properties of QuickDASH - a classical test theory and Rasch analysis study
Man. Ther.
(2011) - et al.
Validation of the Japanese society for surgery of the hand version of the quick disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire
J. Orthop. Sci.
(2006) - et al.
Validation of QuickDASH outcome measure in breast cancer survivors for upper extremity disability
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
(2014) - et al.
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the QuickDASH in patients with upper limb amputation
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
(2015) - et al.
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
(2007) - et al.
The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain
Disabil. Rehabil.
(2016) - et al.
The role of diuretics in treatment of aromatase inhibitors induced musculoskeletal symptoms in women with non metastatic breast cancer
Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP
(2018)
Measurement properties of the 15-item Arabic lower extremity functional scale
Disabil. Rehabil.
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the lower extremity functional scale
Disabil. Rehabil.
Cross-cultural adaptation process and pilot testing of the Arabic version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-Arabic)
Hand Ther.
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Arabic version of the disability of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-Arabic)
Disabil. Rehabil.
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the shoulder pain and disability index
Int. J. Rehabil. Res.
The Arabic Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale-8 (ASES-8): a valid and reliable measure of evaluating self-efficacy in Palestinian patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Disabil. Rehabil.
Functional outcome of open surgical A1 pulley release in diabetic and nondiabetic patients
J. Orthop. Surg.
Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Psychometric properties of two questionnaires in the context of total wrist arthroplasty
Dan Med J
Responsiveness and minimal important change for the quick-DASH in patients with shoulder disorders
Health Qual. Life Outcome
Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation
Clin. Rheumatol.
The SPADI and QuickDASH are similarly responsive in patients undergoing physical therapy for shoulder pain
J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.
Reliability of an Arabic version of the RAND-36 Health Survey and its equivalence to the US-English version
Med. Care
Which is the best outcome measure for rotator cuff tears?
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (Quick-DASH)
Int. J. Prev. Med.
Cited by (6)
Responsiveness of the Arabic Upper Extremity Functional Index in Patients with Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders
2023, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health