Elsevier

Morphologie

Volume 102, Issue 336, March 2018, Pages 6-11
Morphologie

Original article
The sheath of Waldeyer is not a specific anatomical trait of the ureterovesical junctionLa gaine de Waldeyer n’est pas une particularité anatomique spécifique de la jonction urétéro-vésicale

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2017.11.001Get rights and content

Summary

The function of the ureterovesical junction depends upon a peculiar structure, the adventitial fibromuscular sheath of Waldeyer, which coats the distal end of the ureter. The origin of the smooth muscle of Waldeyer's sheath (WS) is disputed. Evidence points more likely to an ureteral one. In this regard we hypothesized the WS is not specific to the distal ureter but is rather a common trait. We therefore aimed at exploring whether or not the proximal ureter is provided with a similar adventitial fibromuscular coat. We performed an immunohistochemical study on human samples of proximal ureter resulted after nephrectomies in ten patients. We applied myoid immunohistochemical markers: α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), desmin, and heavy chain of smooth muscle myosin (SMM) which labeled additional adventitial smooth muscle bundles, a discontinuous inner circular one applied on the muscular coat, and outer longitudinal cords specifically located on one side of the ureter, as is the case for WS. Moreover, the lamina propria myoid deep layer showed isolated smooth muscle fibers and spindle-shaped stromal cells with telocyte morphology. Our results support the idea that WS may not be a specific structure of the distal ureter, instead being just a common anatomical characteristic of the ureter.

Résumé

La fonction de la jonction urétéro-vésicale dépend d’une structure particulière : la gaine fibro-musculaire adventitielle de Waldeyer, qui recouvre l’extrémité distale de l’uretère. L’origine du muscle lisse de la gaine de Waldeyer (WS) est contestée. Elle semble plus susceptible d’être d’origine urétérale. À cet égard, nous avons émis l’hypothèse que la WS n’est pas spécifique à l’uretère distal mais qu’il en est plutôt une caractéristique commune. Nous avons donc cherché à explorer si l’uretère proximal est muni d’une couche fibro-musculaire adventitielle similaire. Nous avons réalisé une étude immunohistochimique sur des échantillons humains d’urètre proximal résultant de néphrectomies chez dix patients. Nous avons recherché par immunohistochimie des marqueurs myoïdes : l’α-SMA, la desmine et la chaîne lourde de la myosine du muscle lisse (SMM) qui marquait d’autres faisceaux musculaires lisses adventitiels, un anneau circulaire interne discontinu appliqué sur la gaine musculaire et des faisceaux longitudinaux externes situés spécifiquement sur un côté de l’uretère, comme c’est le cas pour la WS. De plus, la couche myoïde profonde de lamina propria comportait des fibres musculaires lisses isolées et des cellules stromales fusiformes présentant la morphologie des télocytes. Nos résultats confortent l’idée que la WS peut ne pas être une structure spécifique à l’uretère distal mais qu’il s’agit simplement d’une caractéristique anatomique commune à la totalité de l’uretère.

Introduction

Waldeyer (1892, as quoted in [1]), introduced the term “Ureterscheide” to identify the fibromuscular sheath coating the distal end of the ureter (the juxtavesical ureter). This structure was previously reported by Krause (1876, quoted in [2], [3]) as an extension of the bladder musculature around the distal part of ureter.

It is considered that the Waldeyer's sheath (WS) is the adventitia or outer fibrous coating of the distal 1-3 cm of the ureter, which is reinforced by longitudinal muscle bundles specifically located on one side of the ureter [1], [4]. Elsewhere, the WS is presented as “an external layer of longitudinal smooth muscle”, which “surrounds the ureter” [5]. The WS is also described as a non-striated “collar” [6], which leads to the perception of a circular muscle component. Such a fibromuscular sheath cannot be truly individualized over the transparietal segment of the ureter [7].

There are disputes on the ureteral, or bladder origin of the adventitial muscle layer of the WS. We therefore aimed at evaluating the muscular coats of the proximal end of the ureter, to check whether or not they include such an "Ureterscheide". This was also suggested by our dissection studies in which the proximal ureter was seemingly provided with a muscularized adventitia, as was the distal ureter (Fig. 1).

Section snippets

Material and method

Sample tissues of the proximal 3–4 cm of ureter were obtained from human adult patients (6 males and 4 females) after nephrectomies for renal tumors. The age of patients ranged from 57 to 63 years. Informed consent for research use of tissues was obtained prior to surgery. Approval for the present study was granted by the Institutional Committee. All experiments on human subjects were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (//www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index

Results

On all slides the microanatomy of ureter was adequately identified and consisted of three histological layers, the mucous membrane, the muscular coat and the adventitia or the outer fibrous coat. The mucous membrane was composed of the urothelium and lamina propria, the latter appearing subdivided into a superficial (suburothelial) layer and a deep one. On histological slides, no age- or gender-related differences were noticed.

All three myoid markers were used (desmin, SMM and α-SMA) gave a

Discussion

During embryogenesis, the Wolffian duct opens into the cloaca and the ureteral bud emerges on its dorsal aspect above the junction with the cloaca [8]. Further, the ureteral bud achieves an independent opening into the cloaca, dorsolateral to the opening of the Wolffian duct [8]. The former will migrate upward and laterally and the later migrates downward and medially, thus becoming separated by mesodermal tissue, which forms the bladder trigone [8]. So, all the mesodermal structures arise from

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Acknowledgements

All authors have equally contributed to this study.

References (28)

  • S. Juskiewenski et al.

    The ureterovesical junction

    Anat Clin

    (1984)
  • P.A. King et al.

    Ureteral muscle tone in prevention of vesicoureteral reflux

    Invest Urol

    (1977)
  • C. Radmayr et al.

    Embryology and anatomy of the vesicoureteric junction with special reference to the etiology of vesicoureteral reflux

    Ther Adv Urol

    (2009)
  • A.S. Thomson et al.

    The functional anatomy of the ureterovesical junction

    Br J Urol

    (1994)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Molecular phenotypes of the human kidney: Myoid stromal cells/telocytes and myoepithelial cells

      2018, Annals of Anatomy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Various authors have described distinct TC subtypes, some of them located in the same organ (Grigoriu et al., 2016; Rusu et al., 2017; Vannucchi et al., 2016). There are only a few studies explicitly investigating TCs within the urinary system (Dobra et al., 2018; Gevaert et al., 2012; Metzger et al., 2004; Neuhaus et al., 2018; Qi et al., 2012; Rusu et al., 2014b, 2018; Traini et al., 2018; Wolnicki et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2012). In the kidney, Zheng et al. (2012) found TCs exclusively in the subcapsular space (Zheng et al., 2012).

    • Cardiac telocytes. From basic science to cardiac diseases. II. Acute myocardial infarction

      2018, Annals of Anatomy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, various authors suggested that telocytes were immunopositive for a large number of markers, such as c-kit (CD117), CD34, PDGFR, vimentin, EGFR, tau, SMA, S100, connexin, caveolin, MMP2, DDR2, and so on (Hinescu et al., 2006; Popescu et al., 2006; Mandache et al., 2007; Gherghiceanu et al., 2008; Gherghiceanu and Popescu, 2009; Popescu et al., 2009; Gherghiceanu et al., 2010; Gittenberger-De Groot et al., 2010; Kostin, 2010; Popescu and Faussone-Pellegrini, 2010; Suciu et al., 2010; Cismasiu et al., 2011). Due to this high phenotypical variability, some authors preferred to use the term “telocyte morphology”, implying that under this umbrella were actually gathered more than a single cell type (Rusu et al., 2018; Sanches et al., 2016). Other authors started to use more than one term when describing this morphology, such as: “CD34 stromal cells/telocytes”(Diaz-Flores et al., 2015), or even “CD34+ stromal cells/fibroblasts/fibrocytes/telocytes”(Diaz-Flores et al., 2014).

    • Anatomical and Functional Basis of Vesicoureteral Reflux

      2023, Pediatric Surgery: Pediatric Urology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text