Assessment of two selective agar media to isolate colistin-resistant bovine Escherichia coli: Correlation with minimal inhibitory concentration and presence of mcr genes
Introduction
Polymyxins are bactericidal antibiotics produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa with activity against most Gram-negative bacteria, via an interaction with the lipid A moiety of the lipopolysaccharide (Dowling, 2013; Stansly and Schlosser, 1947). Polymyxin E, or colistin, has been used for decades in veterinary medicine more especially against Escherichia (E.) coli infections in farm animals (Dowling, 2013; Kempf et al., 2016). A few years ago, human medicine began to also use colistin against the carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospitals (Caniaux et al., 2017). Unfortunately it was not long before some species such as Klebsiella (K.) pneumoniae, developed resistance due to mutations in chromosomal genes required for the synthesis of lipid A. The mechanism of resistance is a modification of the negative charge of lipid A that leads to a decreased interaction with the positively-charged polymyxins (Caniaux et al., 2017; Olaitan et al., 2014).
In November 2015, the first plasmid-located transferable mechanism of resistance to colistin was identified in a porcine isolate of E. coli in China (Liu et al., 2016). During the following months and years the mcr-1 (after “mobilized colistin resistance”) gene was identified by PCR in E. coli isolates from cattle, humans, piglets, poultry in several countries in different continents and in several other species of the Enterobacteriaceae family, including Salmonella (S.) enterica and K. pneumonia (Sun et al., 2018). Moreover other mcr genes have been since described: mcr-2 in a porcine E. coli isolate in Belgium (Xavier et al., 2016); mcr-3 in a porcine E. coli isolate in China (Yin et al., 2017); mcr-4 in a porcine S. enterica isolate in Italy (Carattoli et al., 2017); mcr-5 in a poultry S. enterica in Germany (Borowiak et al., 2017); mcr-6, originally named mcr-2.2, in a porcine Moraxella pleuranimalium-like isolate in Great Britain (AbuOun et al., 2017); mcr-7 in a poultry K. pneumoniae isolate in China (Yang et al., 2018); and mcr-8 in a porcine K. pneumoniae isolate in China (Wang et al., 2018).
Identifying acquired resistance of pathogenic bacteria in most routine diagnostic laboratories classically relies on the disk diffusion assay but is not suitable for polymyxins as these poorly diffuse in agar. Actually, the most reliable method for polymyxins is the determination of the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) by the broth dilution assay but this procedure is not compatible with the workload of veterinary first-line diagnostic laboratories. Therefore, three selective media for the detection of Gram negative pathogens with acquired resistance to colistin have been commercialized and assessed in human medicine: SuperPolymyxin or Rapid Polymyxin NP (ELITech MICROBIO, Signes, France), ChromID® Colistin R (BioMérieux, Lyon, France) and CHROMagar™ COL-APSE (CHROMagar, Paris, France) (Abdul Momin et al., 2017; Girlich et al., 2018). As far as the authors know, only the SuperPolymyxin medium has been assessed in veterinary medicine for the detection of porcine colistin-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae (Kieffer et al., 2017).
Since E. coli is the most frequent pathogenic bacteria isolated from young calves with enteritis or septicaemia (Mainil and Fairbrother, 2014), the purpose of this study was to assess two of those selective agar media, ChromID® Colistin R and CHROMagar™ COL-APSE for the routine detection of colistin-resistant E. coli in a veterinary diagnostic laboratory by correlating the bacterial growth with the MIC and with the presence of mcr genes.
Section snippets
E. coli isolates
Since the disk diffusion assay is still routinely carried out with colistin at ARSIA, a total of 158 E. coli were chosen based on the diameter of the inhibition zones according to the breakpoints of enterobacteria (AFNOR, 2012; CA_SFM, 2017): 16 isolates were classified as susceptible (S), 46 as resistant (R) and 96 as intermediate (I). They were isolated between 2013 and 2018 from faeces, intestinal contents, blood, and internal organs, of young calves (<3 months of age) suffering enteritis or
MIC vs disk diffusion assay
Of the 158 E. coli isolates studied 94 had a MIC > 2.0 μg/ml, 5 had a MIC of 2.0 μg/ml and 59 had a MIC < 2.0 μg/ml. Forty-five of the 46 R isolates (98%) at the disk diffusion assay had a MIC > 2.0 μg/ml and of 15 of the 16 S isolates (94%) had a MIC < 2.0 μg/ml while 48 of the 96 I isolates (50%) had a MIC > 2.0 μg/ml and 44 a MIC < 2.0 μg/ml (44%) (Table 1). The remaining R and 4 I isolates had a MIC of 2.0 μg/ml while the remaining S isolate had a MIC of 4.0 μg/ml.
Growth on selective agar media vs disk diffusion assay
Of the 158 studied E. coli
Discussion
In diagnostic laboratories, the disk diffusion assay is routinely used to identify antibiotic resistance profiles of pathogenic bacteria, but is considered unreliable for polymyxins that do not diffuse efficiently in agar media. Unfortunately, other tests, like MIC determination by micro-dilution are not compatible with high turnover veterinary diagnostic laboratories. Nevertheless, there is today a need for a reliable first-line test for colistin in as much chromosome- and plasmid-mediated
Conclusion
These two selective media can be recommended as a first line test in veterinary routine diagnostic laboratories to detect bovine colistin-resistant E. coli. The MIC of all isolates growing on either selective media is ≥ 2.0 μg/ml whereas the MIC of 98% and 94% of the isolates not growing on CHROMID® Colistin R medium and CHROMagar™, respectively is ≤ 2.0 μg/ml. Nevertheless, the disk diffusion assay remains an interesting first line assay in identifying the resistance/susceptibility to colistin
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Sciensano Institute (Brussels, Belgium), the Visavet Health Surveillance Centre (Madrid, Spain) and the Institute for Risk Assessment (Berlin, Germany) for providing positive control strains or DNA for the PCR detection of the mcr-1, mcr-3, 4 and 5 genes. This study was financially supported, in part, by the “Federal Public Service of Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment”.
Declaration of conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References (30)
- et al.
mcr-1-like detection in commensal Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from food-producing animals at slaughter in Europe
Vet. Microbiol.
(2018) - et al.
Colistin use and colistin resistance in bacteria from animals
Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents
(2016) - et al.
Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study
Lancet Infect. Dis.
(2016) - et al.
Towards understanding MCR-like colistin resistance
Trends Microbiol.
(2018) - et al.
Emergence of a novel mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-8, in NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
Emerg. Microbes Infect.
(2018) - et al.
Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-7.1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
(2018) - et al.
CHROMagar COL-APSE: a selective bacterial culture medium for the isolation and differentiation of colistin-resistant Gram-negative pathogens
J. Med. Microbiol.
(2017) - et al.
mcr-1 and mcr-2 (mcr-6.1) variant genes identified in Moraxella species isolated from pigs in Great-Britain from 2014 to 2015
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
(2017) Guide to performing antibiograms using the diffusion method in an agar medium
- et al.
Molecular epidemiology of mcr-encoded colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from food-producing animals in Italy revealed through the EU harmonized antimicrobial resistance monitoring
Front. Microbiol.
(2018)
Résapath - Réseau d'épidémiosurveillance de l'antibiorésistance des bactéries pathogènes animales, bilan 2015, Lyon et Ploufragan-Plouzané, France
Identification of a novel transposon-associated phosphoethanolamine transferase gene, mcr-5, conferring colistin resistance in d-tartrate fermenting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
Veterinary Antibiogram
MCR: modern colistin resistance
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-4 gene in Salmonella and Escherichia coli, Italy 2013, Spain and Belgium, 2015 to 2016
Euro Surveill.
Cited by (11)
How to: screening for mcr-mediated resistance to colistin
2022, Clinical Microbiology and InfectionCitation Excerpt :A wide range of commercial chromogenic and non-chromogenic media developed for colistin resistance detection in clinical, veterinary and environmental samples is currently available (Table 1). CHROMID® Colistin R Agar (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) and CHROMagar™ COL-APSE medium (CHROMagar, Paris, France) [30,31] provide a preliminary colour-based identification of the bacterial species. A non-chromogenic alternative, SuperPolymyxin agar (ELITechGroup), had a similar sensitivity, but a slightly lower specificity, when compared with CHROMID® Colistin R Agar; but without the need for an enrichment step [30,32].
Novel Quadruplex PCR for detecting and genotyping mobile colistin resistance genes in human samples
2021, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious DiseaseCitation Excerpt :Thus the regular surveillance of these human isolated mcr genes also help the appropriate use of colistin in human and animals. Since the positive growth on selective enrichment media was not equivalent to the presence of mcr genes, neither phenotypic resistance nor growth on colistin selective media are perfect indicators for the presence of mcr genes (Thiry et al., 2019), molecular detection methods that targets specific genes are needed. The current routine molecular procedures for mcr genotyping and confirmation depend largely upon technologies such as singleplex PCR (Shen et al., 2018), MLST (Zheng et al., 2019) or WGS (Macesic et al., 2019) or sequencing approach.
Characterization of antibiotic resistance genes and bacteria in a municipal water resource recovery facility
2022, Water Environment ResearchCurrent and emerging polymyxin resistance diagnostics: A systematic review of established and novel detection methods
2022, Journal of Applied Microbiology