Elsevier

Midwifery

Volume 42, November 2016, Pages 93-99
Midwifery

Effectiveness of a theory-based breastfeeding promotion intervention on exclusive breastfeeding in China: A randomised controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of a designed intervention programme on the promotion of exclusive breast feeding during 6 months post partum among Chinese primiparous women, based on the theory of planned behaviour.

Setting

A tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China.

Participants

Chinese primiparous women who were able to breastfed their babies and companied by either husband or mothers.

Intervention

Participants were randomly divided into the intervention and control group. On the basis of the theory of planned behaviour, mothers in the intervention group received the TPB-based intervention programme, including individual instruction, group education and telephone counselling, whereas both the intervention and control group continued to receive routine nursing care.

Measurements and Findings

Data were collected between October 2013 and June 2014. Initially, 352 participants were included. However, 67 of them dropped out or were lost to follow-up. Finally, 285 participants were included into the analysis, including 157 participants in the intervention group and 128 participants in the control group. Though some bias might exist, rates of exclusive breast feeding were consistently and significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group at 3 days (40.1% versus 10.9%, P<0.001), 6 weeks (57.3% versus 29.7%, P<0.001), 4 months (56.7% versus 15.6%, P<0.001) and 6 months post partum (42.0% versus 10.2%, P<0.001).

Conclusion and implications

The TPB-based breast-feeding promotion intervention is effective in improving exclusive breast-feeding rates in primiparous women. Although the current intervention that provides continued support during the hospitalisation and follow-up at home, problems remains in the workplaces.

Introduction

The benefits of breastfeeding, particularly exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) have been well recognised (Victora et al. 2016). It can reduce the risk of hospitalisation and mortality related to diarrhoea, otitis media, and respiratory infection (WHO, 2013a, Victora et al., 2016). Breastfeeding may also decrease the risk of obesity for infants who have been breastfed for more than 6 months in their later life (Scott et al., 2012, Victora et al., 2016). Besides, breastfeeding improves cognition, and children who have been breastfed show higher score in intelligence quotient test and improved performance in school performance (Horta et al., 2015, WHO, 2013b). In addition, long period of breastfeeding is associated with a reduced incidence of breast cancer and ovarian cancer for mothers (Chowdhury et al., 2015, Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, 2002).

The World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children's Fund have put forth an objective to increase breastfeeding rates to 75% in the early periods of infants’ life, to 50% at 6 months and to 25% at 1 year of age (WHO 2002). However, only a limited number of mothers have complied with such recommendations (Mcisaac et al., 2014). In the study by Guo, 28.7% of infants under 6 months have been exclusive breastfed in central and western China (Guo et al., 2013). Another survey conducted in three cities in China reveals that the EBF rate at 6 months is 25.2% (Zhu et al., 2014). The findings of these studies have suggested that few cities and provinces in China have meet the international target rates for EBF. In this situation, intervention studies are required.

Breastfeeding practices are determined by a wide range of socioeconomic, cultural, and individual factors (Rollins et al., 2016). Research has indicated that improved breastfeeding knowledge and attitude toward breastfeeding are related to positive breastfeeding outcome (Zhang et al., 2009, Jessri et al., 2013). The support or obligation of partner can also affect breastfeeding, and successful breastfeeding practices tend to occur among mothers whose family members support breastfeeding (Gibson-Davis and Brooks-Gunn, 2007, Sherriff et al., 2014). Besides, maternal confidence in their ability to breastfeed is a key factor for sustained breastfeeding and efforts that enhance mothers self-efficacy or behaviour control are effective in prolong breastfeeding duration (Meedya et al., 2014, Chan et al., 2016). In addition, employment is reported to be negatively associated with EBF outcome, and employed mothers have a higher rate of early weaving (Yimyam, 2011). Given the aforementioned factors are malleable and may be changed through interventions, it is plausible that efforts target the enhancement of breastfeeding knowledge, attitude toward breastfeeding, family support, maternal confidence in breastfeeding and preparation for work situation should increase exclusive breastfeeding rate.

The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) is a theory that focuses on health-related behaviour (Ajzen, 1991), and has been used in predicting breastfeeding behaviour (Guo et al., 2016, Bai et al., 2010). The TPB assumes that breastfeeding intention is the most important determinant of breastfeeding, which is influenced by a person's attitude toward breastfeeding, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control (Ajzen, 1991). Attitude is determined by a mothers’ beliefs or expectations about the outcome of breastfeeding, which is related to the knowledge on the benefit and importance of breastfeeding. Subjective norm is determined by mothers’ subjective belief about the approval or disapproval of breastfeeding from people important to them (e.g., Husbands, grandmothers). Perceived breastfeeding control is mothers’ belief in her own ability to practice breastfeeding.

We intended to integrate the TPB into breastfeeding intervention programme by focusing on above factors simultaneously: (1) educating mothers with the benefit and importance of breastfeeding (knowledge and attitude); (2) educating and inviting their significant others to involve in the breastfeeding programme, creating a supportive environment (subjective norm); (3) giving breastfeeding individual instruction on correct breastfeeding skill, fostering mothers’ breastfeeding skills (perceived breastfeeding control); and (4) giving advice on breastfeeding-related problems solving through telephone counselling, especially advice that prepare employed mothers for work, providing continued support during postpartum period (perceived breastfeeding control).

Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the TPB-based intervention programme that targeted on improving breastfeeding knowledge and positive attitude, enhancing family support (subjective norm), strengthening breastfeeding control, and preparing for working situation in increasing EBF rate during 6 months post partum among Chinese primiparous women.

Section snippets

Research design and participants

This is a prospective randomised controlled trial conducted in a tertiary hospital, which is a teaching hospital accredited as an ‘AAA’ tertiary care specialty hospital with an average of 15,000–17,000 new births per annum. The majority mothers served in this hospital were local resident, only a small amount of mothers come from other cities. We assumed the current rate of exclusive breastfeeding was almost 30% at 6 months (Guo et al., 2013), and wanted to increase it to 50%, as recommended by

Intervention

The intervention group was offered the TPB-based intervention programme by three nurses, in addition to the routine nursing care. In order to ensure the quality and consistency of intervention, they were trained before the study. The TPB-based intervention programme comprised one individual instruction and two group educations at hospital and continued telephone counselling at home during postpartum period. The intervention protocol is summarised in Table 1. Whereas, the control group received

Data collection

Ethical approval was granted by the Research Ethics Review Committee of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China. Fig. 1 shows the process of data collection. The eligible participants were approached on the first day after childbirth and informed about the purpose of the study, procedures, confidentiality and anonymity preserved, and potential risks and benefits. Then, written informed consents were obtained. Meanwhile, demographic information was collected, which included

Data analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation, while categorical variables as number and proportion. The demographic homogeneity between groups were examined using T-test for continuous variables and χ2 for categorical variables. Besides, χ2 test was used to compare the differences of EBF rate between groups at different time points. Participants who dropped out or those who were lost to follow-up during postpartum period were excluded from analysis and reported separately.

Findings

Participants were recruited consecutively from October 2013 to January 2014 and follow-up was completed by June 2014. During the recruitment period, 445 participants were recruited and assessed the eligibility. The flow diagram is illustrated in Fig. 2. Only 352 of 445 participants (79.1%) met the inclusion criteria and signed the written informed consents. Of the 93 participants excluded, 71 participants failed to meet the inclusion criteria, and the other 41 participants refused to

Discussion

The purpose of this randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a specially designed theory-based intervention programme on the promotion of EBF among Chinese primiparous women during 6 months post partum. Overall, the findings suggested that current intervention was effective in increasing the EBF rates within 6 months post partum. The EBF rates in the intervention group were much higher than the control group in this study, especially at 4 and 6 months.

A previous study

Limitations and generalisability

The current intervention programme focused on several factors of breastfeeding and involved a number of intervention strategies, which might lead to the overall high rates of EBF in the intervention group than the control group. Nevertheless, it was impossible to identify the specific strategies that were most effective in the current study. Meanwhile, some bias might exist due to the uncompleted data on the 67 participants excluded. There were 44 women dropped out or out of contact in the

Funding

This work was supported by the Funding of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee under Grant of 134119a1000 and 14495810900.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Houyan Wen for research co-ordination; Si Sun for the help of data collection; and the women and their infants who participated in this study.

References (32)

  • I. Ajzen

    The theory of planned behavior

    Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes

    (1991)
  • Y. Bai et al.

    Predictors of continuation of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life

    Journal of Human Lactation

    (2010)
  • A.A. Brasileiro et al.

    The impact of breastfeeding promotion in women with formal employment

    Cadernos De Saúde Pública

    (2010)
  • Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer

    Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50 302 women with breast cancer and 96 973 women without the disease

    Lancet

    (2002)
  • M.Y. Chan et al.

    The effect of a self-efficacy-based educational programme on maternal breast feeding self-efficacy, breast feeding duration and exclusive breast feeding rates: a longitudinal study

    Midwifery

    (2016)
  • R. Chowdhury et al.

    Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Acta Paediatrica

    (2015)
  • R. Cohen et al.

    The impact of two corporate lactation programs on the incidence and duration of breast-feeding by employed mothers

    The American Journal of Health Promotion

    (1994)
  • C.M. Gibson-Davis et al.

    The association of couples’ relationship status and quality with breastfeeding initiation

    Journal of Marriage and Family

    (2007)
  • J.L. Guo et al.

    Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior in predicting breastfeeding: meta-analysis and structural equation modeling

    Applied Nursing Research

    (2016)
  • S. Guo et al.

    Breastfeeding rates in central and western China in 2010: implications for child and population health

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization

    (2013)
  • S. Haroon et al.

    Breastfeeding promotion intervention and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review

    BMC Public Health

    (2013)
  • B.L. Horta et al.

    Breastfeeding and intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Acta Paediatrica

    (2015)
  • A. Imdad et al.

    Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on breastfeeding rates, with special focus on developing countries [J]

    BMC Public Health

    (2011)
  • M. Jessri et al.

    Predictors of exclusive breastfeeding: observations from the Alberta pregnancy outcomes and nutrition (APrON) study

    BMC Pediatrics

    (2013)
  • B. Jiang et al.

    Evaluation of the impact of breast milk expression in early postpartum period on breastfeeding duration: a prospective cohort study[J]

    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

    (2015)
  • K.E. Mcisaac et al.

    Exclusive breastfeeding among Canadian Inuit: results from the Nunavut Inuit Child Health Survey

    Journal of Human Lactation

    (2014)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Breastfeeding after a cesarean section: A literature review

      2021, Midwifery
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, most studies have shown that those initiatives are not associated with a statistically significant increase in the outcome benefits. The initiative program based on the theory of planned behavior has exhibited a positive effect on the improvement of breastfeeding and the rate of exclusive breastfeeding, although result bias might still exist in the studies due to data loss that would require further validation (Gu et al., 2016). Although most of the evaluated initiatives implemented randomized controlled trials, single - or non-blind study design, and the loss to follow-up might limit the results' external validity (Creswell, 2013).

    • Effectiveness of theory-based educational interventions on breastfeeding self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2020, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      In total, 5678 prenatal and postnatal mothers were included in our meta-analysis, with 4178 mothers in the breastfeeding self-efficacy group and 1500 in the theory of planned behavior group. The majority of mothers were 29 years old, had participated in an intervention in a hospital setting, were from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries (14 countries, including the USA, Canada, Denmark, Australia, and Turkey), and the majority resided in the USA (Table S1, see Appendix A). Among 24 RCTs, 19 interventions were based on the breastfeeding self-efficacy theory while five of them were based on the theory of planned behavior.

    • Perinatal breastfeeding interventions including fathers/partners: A systematic review of the literature

      2019, Midwifery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The search retrieved 6390 articles and after removing duplicates, 3982 titles and abstracts were examined of which 35 were selected for full article review. Twenty articles did not meet eligibility criteria and were excluded due to: (1) not evaluating a psychosocial or educational breastfeeding intervention specifically targeting fathers (n = 10) (Dehcheshmeh et al., 2014; Gu et al., 2016; Hannula et al., 2014; Mörelius et al., 2015; Mukuria et al., 2016; Turan et al., 2001; Nilsson et al., 2017; Pinelli et al., 2001; Sahip and Turan, 2007; Sheehan, 1999), (2) not reporting original study data (n= 2) (Jimerson, 2012; Maycock et al., 2015), (3) not using a randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental design (n= 5) (Abbass-Dick et al., 2017; Gözükara and Taşkın, 2014; Lovera et al., 2010; Mete et al., 2010; Alberdi et al., 2018), or (4) not providing data on at least one primary study outcome (n = 2) (Bich et al., 2016; Susin et al., 1999). An additional article was excluded as the publication was of a poster presentation with insufficient data and we received no response from the contact author (Byas and Du, 2011).

    • Parent-targeted postnatal educational interventions in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review and critical analysis

      2019, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies varied in targeting parents of full-term (55%) or preterm/low birth weight newborns (39%), with the remaining not specifying. All studies targeted mothers, with only seven studies also including fathers (Abdeyazdan et al., 2014; Beheshtipour et al., 2014; Çeber et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2016; Gu et al., 2016; Susin and Giugliani, 2008; Turan et al., 2008). No studies targeted other family members.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text