Binderless zeolite coatings on macroporous α-SiC foams
Graphical abstract
Introduction
The microporous structure as well as the defined pore architecture and size of zeolites are well established. In addition, these crystalline aluminosilicates have found widespread applications as ionic exchangers [1], molecular sieves [2], petrochemicals cracking catalysts [3] and more recently as confinement media [4]. Hence, zeolites are considered as green catalysts. A proper control of their chemical composition and microstructure is ensured during the synthesis. In contrast, zeolites are mainly used in catalytic fixed beds in the forms of randomly packed microgranules or extrudated pellets having few millimeters in size. Their macrostructure remains therefore fairly undefined.
Although zeolites exhibit many advantages, their industrial application can be hindered by the following drawbacks in a fixed bed-use; (a) high-pressure drop, (b) limited heat and mass transport rates, (c) axial dispersion leading to loss of selectivity, and (d) susceptibility to fouling by dust [5].
During the past decades, a deeper attention has been paid to the development of zeolite coatings on various macro-shaped supports [6]. Studying new active phase formulations, numerous researches have been focused on the development of structured composites (catalyst + support), which could provide an easier access of the reactants to the active sites and also avoid mass transport limitations [7]. There have been various attempts to allow the growth of zeolite crystals on macroscopic inert supporting materials. One can cite for instance, both meso- and macroporous glass monoliths [8], alumina [9], metals [10], ceramic foam [5], [11], sacrificial biological supports [6](d), [12], which have been used as supports for the development of structured catalytic beds. Among those aforementioned materials, silicon carbide (SiC) appears as a promising support due to its robustness. Indeed, these porous ceramics exhibit the required intrinsic properties to become valuable candidates as zeolite support. Silicon carbide materials possess high thermal conductivity, high mechanical strength, excellent resistance to oxidation, chemical inertness and ease of shaping [13]. In contrast to β-polymorph, α-SiC demonstrates a higher thermal conductivity and better resistance to attrition [14].
SiC porous substrates have been widely used as filters, membranes, catalyst supports, thermal insulator, gas-burner media, and refractory materials owing to their superior properties, such as: low bulk density, high permeability, high temperature stability, and erosion resistance [15]. Silicon carbide possesses a low density which significantly reduces the fraction of useless weight in the overall composite weight. Finally, β-SiC synthesized according to the shape-memory-synthesis [13] exhibits a medium surface area, rendering it suitable for the dispersion of zeolite crystals on its surface [5], [11](e).
The aim of the present study is to use our experience in the zeolite coating techniques [5], [8](b), [11](e) to allow the growth of zeolite crystals on barely “receptive” α-SiC material. The two main routes for the synthesis will be investigated using alkaline medium or fluoride anions as mineralizer. Furthermore, the addition or not of external silica source will be studied. Fig. 1 schematically describes the two different strategies followed: depending on the conditions, one may expect the formation of different zeolite structures. One further objective is to produce composite materials having both a duplex macroporosity (giant pores: diameter ≈ 38 μm and macropores: diameter ≈ 7 μm) along with microporosity and mesoporosity gained by the zeolite coating.
Section snippets
Experimental
All the chemicals were used as received from the suppliers.
Results and discussion
The main objective of our study is to develop structured catalytic beds for an easier application in real reactors. Accordingly, ZSM-5 zeolite was chosen as catalyst to be coated on extremely robust α-SiC material.
Table 1 summarizes the syntheses performed to obtain composite materials along with respective operating conditions. It is noteworthy that the addition of TEOS as an external silica source led to the sole formation of MFI zeolite crystals onto macroporous SiC foam. Indeed, both
Tentative mechanism of ANA crystals growth on SiC surface
The experimental factors which govern the self-assembly of zeolite crystals onto support surfaces in thin films or other coatings are not well understood yet. Nevertheless, the T–O–T bond making and bond breaking (where T = Si or Al), based upon nucleophilic reactions, facilitate structural modification catalyzed by hydroxyl ions. Furthermore, it appears that this strategy of using the self-transformation of pristine α-SiC support, allows the formation of ANA zeolite crystals, which can grow with
Conclusion
Several zeolite coatings have been successfully achieved over α-SiC support. This study demonstrates that depending on the presence (or not) of an external Si-source, different zeolites can be synthesized on α-SiC foam surface. MFI crystals could be grown following a conventional procedure. In contrast, ANA zeolite structure was formed without any additional Si-source. The surface coverage and the size of ANA crystals have been tailored in view of future application of these composites.
Merging
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) for supporting the ANR-10-JCJC-0703 project (SelfAsZeo). K.S. and B.L. are grateful to the Barrande program for funding 26551RE project. The present project is supported by the National Research Fund, Luxembourg (PL PhD Grant). The technical assistance of Thierry Romero (ICPEES) was highly appreciated.
References (34)
- et al.
Zeolites and Catalysis
(2010)et al.Appl. Catal. A
(2012)et al.J. Phys. Chem. C
(2012)et al.J. Phys. Chem. B
(2006) - et al.
Catal. Today
(2006)et al.Cattech
(2001)et al.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
(2010)et al.Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
(2011) - et al.
Mater. Sci. Eng., C
(2006)et al.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
(2000) - et al.
Cattech
(2001)et al.Adv. Ceram. Mater.
(1987) - et al.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1979) J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1967)- et al.
Chem. Eur. J.
(2013) - et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(2007) - et al.
Allg. Chem.
(2011) - et al.
J. Phys. Chem. B
(1998)et al.J. Phys. Chem. B
(1999)et al.J. Phys. Chem. B
(1999)et al.J. Phys. Chem. B
(1999)
Kinetik der Phasenbildung
Langmuir
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
J. Memb. Sci.
Zeolites in Industrial Separation and Catalysis
Chem. Rev.
Top. Catal.
Appl. Catal. A
Chem. Eur. J.
Cited by (26)
Preparation of high performance porous SiC ceramic membrane support using zeolite and alumina as sintering additives
2024, Materials Science and Engineering: BZeolite A grown on fiberglass: A prominent CO<inf>2</inf> adsorbent for CO<inf>2</inf>/CH<inf>4</inf> separation
2024, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering AspectsTuning the catalytic acidity in Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> nanofibers with mordenite nanocrystals for dehydration reactions
2022, Catalysis Science and TechnologySolvent-free crystallization of ZSM-5 zeolite on SiC foam as a monolith catalyst for biofuel upgrading
2020, Chinese Journal of CatalysisStructured ZSM-5/SiC foam catalysts for bio-oils upgrading
2020, Applied Catalysis A: GeneralIncreasing the catalytic performance of erionite by hierarchization
2020, Microporous and Mesoporous MaterialsCitation Excerpt :However, the small pores of erionite bring diffusional constrains and restrict reactants accessibility to the active sites located in the micropores. Diffusion limitations can be reduced by generating intra- and/or inter-particle mesopores by bottom-up (e.g. synthesis of nanosized crystals with intercrystalline mesoporosity) [12–18] and top-down (e.g. selective or non-selective leaching of tetrahedral elements resulting in additional intracrystalline mesoporosity) [19,20] approaches. The reduced path length for reactants and products further decreases the extent of many secondary reactions, including the formation of coke precursors.