Elsevier

Journal of Membrane Science

Volume 555, 1 June 2018, Pages 206-219
Journal of Membrane Science

Feasibility study of a forward osmosis/crystallization/reverse osmosis hybrid process with high-temperature operation: Modeling, experiments, and energy consumption

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.031Get rights and content

Highlights

  • High temperature operation for FO/crystallization/RO hybrid process was suggested.

  • Appropriate draw solute candidates were selected.

  • Transport and energy consumption model for the hybrid process were developed.

  • Appropriate membrane parameters condition were estimated from experimental data.

  • The energy consumption of the hybrid process was calculated for each draw solute.

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of a forward osmosis (FO)/crystallization/reverse osmosis (RO) hybrid process with high-temperature operating conditions to assess its feasibility as desalination technology. A process configuration and draw solute candidates are suggested. A mathematical model was developed to describe transport phenomena at the described operating conditions and an experimental study was conducted to investigate the amounts of water and reverse salt fluxes and to validate the developed model. Based on the experimental data, suitable membrane parameters for each process were estimated, and the applicability of the operating conditions was confirmed. An energy consumption model for the hybrid process was also developed and a comparative study with the conventional seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) process was conducted. The equivalent work in the hybrid process is around 1.66–2.72 kW h/m3 when heat-electricity energy cost conversion is considered. The energy requirement of the hybrid process is competitive with that of conventional SWRO process. Of the total energy requirement of the process, thermal energy comprises 0.6–1.1 kW h/m3. Thus, the energy requirement can be lowered to less than 1.0 kW h/m3 if very cheap waste energy is available.

Introduction

As the human population has increased worldwide, the problem of water scarcity is considered one of the most severe challenges we face in the future [1]. Because more than 97% of water on Earth exists as seawater, there is no doubt that seawater desalination may be the ultimate solution to water scarcity problems [2], [3]. Today, the seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) process is regarded as the most energy-efficient technology for seawater desalination [4]. The energy requirement of the SWRO process has decreased to around 2 kW h/m3 [1] and water production costs have dropped to lower than $0.7/m3 for medium-sized systems (12,000–60,000 m3/day) [5]. However, the inevitable utilization of high-pressure pumps in SWRO processes leads to many problems, such as severe irreversible fouling at the surface of the reverse osmosis (RO) membrane and high membrane replacement costs [6]. In addition, the theoretical minimum amount of energy required to separate fresh water from 35 g/L seawater is 1.06 kW h/m3 at 50% recovery [1]. Thus, the energy efficiency of seawater desalination can be improved if novel processes can be developed.

Forward osmosis (FO) has received much attention in recent decades, and has been regarded as an alternative technology to RO [7]. A great deal of investigation has been conducted into how the energy consumption of seawater desalination could be decreased by utilizing FO [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], but it has been revealed that the energy requirement of a standalone FO process cannot be lower than that of a conventional RO process [13], [14]. To overcome this limitation, hybrid process designs in which FO is coupled with other processes such as membrane distillation (MD) [15], [16], [17], [18], electrodialysis (ED) [19], nanofiltration (NF) [20], [21], and RO [8], [22], [23], [24] have been explored, as summarized in Table 1. It has been suggested that process hybridizations with FO may have some potential for future desalination technology, although more research should be carried out to replace the conventional RO process.

Recently, a hybrid process of FO/crystallization/RO was suggested. As demonstrated in our previous report, this hybrid process was expected to be competitive in terms of energy consumption relative to the RO process [25]. However, the energy requirement of the FO/crystallization/RO hybrid process is still quite high even in the lowest energy case (~ 2.15 kW h/m3). The main reason of this high energy requirement is the energy-consuming refrigerator used to cool the crystallizer. Because of the low energy efficiency of the refrigerator, the operation mode described in the previous paper cannot easily decrease energy consumption significantly. In other words, the energy efficiency of the hybrid process would be improved if utilization of a refrigerator could be avoided. In our previous report, an operation mode was already mentioned in which the FO process operates above ambient temperature and the effluent stream of the FO process is cooled in a crystallizer with a cooling tower rather than a refrigerator. In this high-temperature operation mode, utilization of refrigerator could be obviated. Thus, the energy requirement for operating the FO/crystallization/RO hybrid process could be significantly reduced. In addition, if waste heat energy could be utilized almost free of charge, the high-temperature operation mode of the FO process would become a competitive design for seawater desalination. Thus, the feasibility of this novel operation mode should be investigated both theoretically and experimentally.

In this study, a high-temperature operating mode for the FO/crystallization/RO hybrid process is proposed and analyzed with experimental results and simulation approaches. Draw solute candidates were carefully selected based on criteria to operate the hybrid process efficiently. An experimental setup for each part of the FO/crystallization/RO hybrid process was used to study the performance of the selected draw solutes in terms of water flux and solubility at each temperature. Membrane parameters and van’t Hoff coefficients of the draw solutes were estimated based on the experimental results. Next, specific energy consumptions were calculated with the proposed model to evaluate the energy performance of each draw solute in the hybrid process. Finally, the energy-feasibility of the hybrid process with a high-temperature operating mode is validated by comparing to the results with those of the conventional RO process, which is a one stage SWRO process. If the energy feasibility is competitive compared with the conventional RO process, the developed models and experimental data may be utilized in commercialization of the hybrid process and cost estimation for detailed design in future works.

Section snippets

Process description

The hybrid FO/crystallization/RO process is composed of three units, as illustrated in Fig. 1. In the FO process, which is considered the main desalination unit, water molecules permeate from the feed (seawater) stream to the draw solution stream spontaneously, driven by the osmotic pressure difference across the membrane. The effluent diluted draw solution from the FO process is fed into the crystallizer to at least partially separate draw solutes from the draw solution based on the solubility

Solubility measurements

The measured solubilities of each draw solution are displayed in Fig. 6 with reference data [41], [42]. The measured solubility data revealed that the solubilities of the selected draw solutes have sufficiently high temperature dependence for the hybrid process to operate efficiently. Especially around 50–70 °C, the solubility variability is extreme. Based on the measured data, it can be concluded that the operating temperature of the FO process should be around 70 °C (at least 60 °C). At

Conclusions

In this study, high-temperature operating conditions for an FO/crystallization/RO hybrid process were investigated. Models for describing the process and its energy consumption were developed and experimental data were obtained to confirm the feasibility of the hybrid process and its operating conditions. A comparative study of the energy consumption of the hybrid process and the conventional RO process was also performed.

Through crystallization experiments, the actual solubility of each draw

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Lotte Chemical Corporation and Korea University grant.

References (59)

  • D. Zhao et al.

    Thermoresponsive copolymer-based draw solution for seawater desalination in a combined process of forward osmosis and membrane distillation

    Desalination

    (2014)
  • T.N. Bitaw et al.

    Optimization on a new hybrid forward osmosis-electrodialysis-reverse osmosis seawater desalination process

    Desalination

    (2016)
  • S. Zhao et al.

    Brackish water desalination by a hybrid forward osmosis–nanofiltration system using divalent draw solute

    Desalination

    (2012)
  • O. Bamaga et al.

    Hybrid FO/RO desalination system: preliminary assessment of osmotic energy recovery and designs of new FO membrane module configurations

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • S. Liyanaarachchi et al.

    Mass balance for a novel RO/FO hybrid system in seawater desalination

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2016)
  • D.Y. Kim et al.

    Theoretical analysis of a seawater desalination process integrating forward osmosis, crystallization, and reverse osmosis

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2013)
  • Q. She et al.

    Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes

    Water Res.

    (2012)
  • B. Gu et al.

    Mathematical model of flat sheet membrane modules for FO process: plate-and-frame module and spiral-wound module

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2011)
  • J.R. McCutcheon et al.

    Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • A. Salama

    Heat exchanger network synthesis based on minimum rule variations

    Appl. Therm. Eng.

    (2008)
  • M. Li

    Reducing specific energy consumption in reverse osmosis (RO) water desalination: an analysis from first principles

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • A. Zhu et al.

    Minimization of energy consumption for a two-pass membrane desalination: effect of energy recovery, membrane rejection and retentate recycling

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2009)
  • A. Apelblat et al.

    Solubility of ascorbic, 2-furancarboxylic, glutaric, pimelic, salicylic, and o-phthalic acids in water from 279.15 to 342.15 K, and apparent molar volumes of ascorbic, glutaric, and pimelic acids in water at 298.15 K

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1989)
  • S.-B. Kwon et al.

    Molecular layer-by-layer assembled forward osmosis membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • M. Shibuya et al.

    Effect of operating conditions on osmotic-driven membrane performances of cellulose triacetate forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane

    Desalination

    (2015)
  • W. Wang et al.

    Effects of pH and temperature on forward osmosis membrane flux using rainwater as the makeup for cooling water dilution

    Desalination

    (2014)
  • J.S. Yong et al.

    Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2012)
  • S.-J. You et al.

    Temperature as a factor affecting transmembrane water flux in forward osmosis: steady-state modeling and experimental validation

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2012)
  • G.M. Geise et al.

    Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (30)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text