Thermodynamic analysis of energy density in pressure retarded osmosis: The impact of solution volumes and costs
Introduction
Pressure retarded osmosis is a method of generating energy from a potential energy gradient between two solutions [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. In PRO, a volume of water is passed up a pressure gradient by a chemical potential gradient generated by dissolved solutes. The volume passed and its energy density are interdependent: operating at high pressures will limit the relative volume that can be passed but the volume will have a high energy density, while operating at low pressures will allow a larger relative volume of water to transfer with a lower energy density. There have been a number of papers which consider the energy that can be extracted in a PRO process; this energy is inversely related to the minimum energy of desalination [28], [29], [30]. Previous characterizations of volumetric energy density of PRO processes have defined a frame of reference to dictate the resulting value based on the stream perceived to be more expensive or limiting; two previous analyses of a commonly proposed osmotic energy source, the mixing of seawater and riverwater, resulted in different analyses by selecting opposite bases for normalization. Veerman et al investigate the “fuel efficiency” of a seawater–riverwater reverse electrodialysis (RED) process and concluded that if the pretreatment cost of riverwater is substantial [31], operating at high transfer by fully diluting the concentrated solution will be more efficient. Yip and Elimelech [14], [15], however, arrive at an energy density of approximately 0.75 kWh/m3 of dilute feed solution for a seawater–riverwater PRO process by assuming the dilute feed solution will be the limiting resource. As the energy of mixing is a thermodynamic property, is has been shown that the maximum extractable energy for RED and PRO processes are identical for identical feed conditions [32]. More recently, Lin et al analyze the specific energy density of PRO process accounting for both feed and draw solution but ignoring, to an extent, dimensional parameters such as membrane area and module length [33]. By this type of analysis, the volumetric energy density of either or both streams may be specified to yield a more practical result for process design. A more general analysis of the “cost” per unit volume of PRO working solutions, such as pretreatment and pumping costs, allows extension of the concept of specific energy density to specific energy “cost”, which allows the minimization of the total cost, per total volume of input solution.
Analyses of seawater and riverwater PRO processes have implied that the volumetric energy density of the process, which has a maximum value of approximately 0.192 kWh/m3 of seawater and riverwater combined, is too low, especially when considering pretreatment costs for seawater and riverwater, to be a practical source of renewable energy [33]. PRO has also been proposed and evaluated as an energy recovery process for reverse osmosis (RO), by which riverwater or treated wastewater is mixed with RO brine to recover a portion of the energy spent on desalination [32], [34], [35]. Both of these processes are open-loop, in that the feed streams are not manually regenerated. Osmotic heat engines (OHE) have been proposed which utilize continually regenerated (closed-loop) streams of concentrated and dilute solutions [33], [36]. While such a system is feasible in a number of forms, OHE are typically contrived to utilize low-grade heat and are proposed as add-on energy recovery systems, not as primary energy generation technologies, as the thermal efficiencies are typically low and temperatures are restricted to those which polymeric membranes can withstand [37]. These engines are proposed as alternatives to Organic Rankine Cycle engines (ORC) for recovering waste heat from industrial processes and power production. A third form of PRO may be envisioned in which an external, natural source of feedwater, e.g. seawater or riverwater, is combined with a stored solution, e.g. rainwater or an specialized draw solute, to produce power. Such a system must only store one of the solutions of a traditional closed-loop PRO process. Like closed-loop systems, such “semi-open” systems must regenerate the initial stored solution and external solution for re-use and discharge.
The closed-loop and semi-open loop PRO processes allow for the storage of energy through the storage of the unmixed working fluids. A plant may operate as a load-leveling battery, generating concentrated and dilute solutions at night and mixing them during the day, or as a battery for peak demand or intermittent power production. For the application of an osmotic battery, the specific energy density allows the comparison between competing forms of stored energy which have better defined specific energy densities; this includes solid-state batteries, flow-cell battery working fluid, fuel cell fuels, and combustion fuels. The specific energy density, here defined only in terms of the process working fluids, may then be weighed in combination with other concerns, membrane power density, in W/m2, the related module power density, in W/m3, and the system cost in USD/W. By analyzing the specific energy density of osmotic agents as well as the limits on energy extraction by reasonable operating conditions, it is possible to compare PRO systems to competing technologies such as chemical heat pumps, thermal storage, pumped hydro gravity storage, solid-state batteries, flow cell batteries, and compressed air storage.
In this paper a general method is developed for estimating the volumetric energy efficiency of pressure retarded osmosis via pressure-volume analysis of a membrane process. The resulting model requires only the osmotic pressure, , and mass fraction, , of water in the concentrated and dilute feed solutions to estimate the maximum achievable specific energy density, , as a function of operating pressure. This method utilizes equilibrium analysis to specify the volumetric mixing fraction of concentrated and dilute solution as a function of operating pressure, and provides results for the total volumetric energy density of similar order to more complex models. Utilizing this methodology, it is possible to examine the effects of volumetric solution cost, operation of a module at various pressure, and operation of a constant pressure module with various feed.
Section snippets
Osmotic equilibrium and piston-type model of PRO processes
The pressure required to maintain equilibrium between a solution of pure water and a solution containing a solute is the osmotic pressure. In a piston-type PRO process, as illustrated in Fig. 1a, the initial state is that the applied pressure is equal to the osmotic pressure. If the pressure applied to the concentrated solution is changed by an infinitesimal amount, an infinitesimal amount of pure water will permeate the membrane. In all subsequent expressions, the water transferred (ΔV) is
Advantage of osmotic pressure-volume method
As mentioned the osmotic pressure-volume method assumes an adaptation of the Morse relationship between osmotic pressure and concentrations [38], [39]. Thus any future osmotic pressure resulting from the addition or removal of pure water can be predicted solely input osmotic pressure (πHI), the corresponding mass fraction (wHI), and relative volume of water added VLI/ΔV and VHI/ΔV. The initial osmotic pressure is ideally derived from experimental measurement (i.e. vapor pressure, isopiestic,
Conclusion
This paper presents a methodology for evaluating the energy density of solution used in operating a PRO process as a function of the available solution osmotic pressures and the module operating pressure. Via this method, an alternative derivation the energy of mixing is reached in the form of Eqs. (2), (4). Application of Eqs. (2), (4) allows the calculation of thermodynamic limits for both osmotic energy generation processes and desalination processes without many of the approximations,
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the United States Department of Energy through contract DE-AC07-05ID14517. Funding was supplied by Idaho National Laboratory via the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program. The authors thank Prof. Nathan Tefft of Bates College for discussion concerning the mathamatics.
References (60)
Production of energy from concentrated brines by pressure-retarded osmosis : I. Preliminary technical and economic correlations
J. Membr. Sci.
(1976)- et al.
Osmo-power. Theory and performance of an osmo-power pilot plant
Ocean. Eng.
(1981) - et al.
Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis
J. Membr. Sci.
(1981) Energy production at the Dead Sea by pressure-retarded osmosis: challenge or chimera?
Desalination
(1998)- et al.
Salinity-gradient power: evaluation of pressure-retarded osmosis and reverse electrodialysis
J. Membr. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Osmotic power — power production based on the osmotic pressure difference between waters with varying salt gradients
Desalination
(2008) - et al.
The potential for power production from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis
J. Membr. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module
J. Membr. Sci.
(2010) - et al.
Pressure retarded osmosis: from the vision of Sidney Loeb to the first prototype installation — Review
Desalination
(2010) - et al.
Potential of osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater as feed solution: analysis and experiments
J. Membr. Sci.
(2013)
Energy generation from osmotic pressure difference between the low and high salinity water by pressure retarded osmosis
J. Technol. Innov. Renew. Energy
Energy and thermodynamic analysis of power generation using a natural salinity gradient based pressure retarded osmosis process
Desalination
Osmotic power with pressure retarded osmosis: theory, performance and trends – a review
J. Membr. Sci.
Blue energy: current technologies for sustainable power generation from water salinity gradient
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Membrane processes and renewable energies
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
The energetics of desalination processes
Desalination
Exergy analysis of water purification and desalination: a study of exergy model approaches
Desalination
Reverse electrodialysis: performance of a stack with 50 cells on the mixing of sea and river water
J. Membr. Sci.
Second law analysis of reverse osmosis desalination plants: an alternative design using pressure retarded osmosis
Energy
A comparative life cycle assessment of hybrid osmotic dilution desalination and established seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation processes
Water Res.
A novel ammonia–carbon dioxide osmotic heat engine for power generation
J. Membr. Sci.
Deriving osmotic pressures of draw solutes used in osmotically driven membrane processes
J. Membr. Sci.
Switchable polarity solvents as draw solutes for forward osmosis
Desalination
An initial study of hexavalent phosphazene salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis
Desalination
Performance evaluation of trimethylamine–carbon dioxide thermolytic draw solution for engineered osmosis
J. Membr. Sci.
Thermo-sensitive polyelectrolytes as draw solutions in forward osmosis process
Desalination
Functionalized thermo-responsive microgels for high performance forward osmosis desalination
Water Res.
Limits of power production due to finite membrane area in pressure retarded osmosis
J. Membr. Sci.
Using nanocomposite materials technology to understand and control reverse osmosis membrane compaction
Desalination
Solution-diffusion with defects model for pressure-assisted forward osmosis
J. Membr. Sci.
Cited by (26)
Modeling solution vapor equilibria with solvation and solute assembly
2021, Journal of Molecular LiquidsPrinciple and theoretical background of pressure-retarded osmosis process
2021, Osmosis EngineeringIntegration of pressure retarded osmosis in the solar ponds for desalination and photo-assisted chloralkali processes: Energy and exergy analysis
2019, Energy Conversion and ManagementCitation Excerpt :Therefore, the target for the research development in this area is to produce such power through the development of membranes and optimization of feed and draw streams. Modeling research by Reimund et al. [11] showed that hypersaline has the potential to exceed 1 kWh/m3 (total volume) compared to 0.18–0.19 kWh/m3 seawater-river water mixing processes. In fact, the model developed has been used to study the potential of hypersaline draws up to osmotic pressure of 171 bar.
Increasing osmotic power and energy with maximum power point tracking
2019, Applied EnergyA simulation study with a new performance index for pressure-retarded osmosis processes hybridized with seawater reverse osmosis and membrane distillation
2018, DesalinationCitation Excerpt :Those projects produced many valuable results that contributed to the progress of PRO. However, the viability of PRO is still controversial due to its productivity limits, which can be predicted through thermodynamic analysis [10–14]. Many researchers claim that using stand-alone PRO with status quo technology makes it hard to secure enough energy to reach a break-even point.