Elsevier

Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology

Volume 399, 5 January 2015, Pages 190-200
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology

A multi-step, dynamic allosteric model of testosterone's binding to sex hormone binding globulin

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2014.09.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Accurate estimation of free testosterone (fT) is used widely in the diagnosis of hyogonadism.

  • Complexity of direct measurements have led to development of models for calculation of fT.

  • Current models used for fT estimation show systematic deviation from values measured by equilibrium dialysis.

  • The SHBG exhibits complex behaviour in associating with testosterone.

  • fT values from new mechanistic model incorporating allostery in SHBG:T match closely with those measured by equilibrium dialysis.

Abstract

Purpose

Circulating free testosterone (FT) levels have been used widely in the diagnosis and treatment of hypogonadism in men. Due to experimental complexities in FT measurements, the Endocrine Society has recommended the use of calculated FT (cFT) as an appropriate approach for estimating FT. We show here that the prevailing model of testosterone's binding to SHBG, which assumes that each SHBG dimer binds two testosterone molecules and that the two binding sites on SHBG have similar binding affinity is erroneous and provides FT values that differ substantially from those obtained using equilibrium dialysis.

Methods

We characterized testosterone's binding to SHBG using binding isotherms, ligand depletion curves, and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). We derived a new model of testosterone's binding to SHBG from these experimental data and used this model to determine FT concentrations and compare these values with those derived from equilibrium dialysis.

Results

Experimental data on testosterone's association with SHBG generated using binding isotherms including equilibrium binding, ligand depletion experiments, and ITC provide evidence of a multi-step dynamic process, encompassing at least two inter-converting microstates in unliganded SHBG, readjustment of equilibria between unliganded states upon binding of the first ligand molecule, and allosteric interaction between two binding sites of SHBG dimer. FT concentrations in men determined using the new multistep dynamic model with complex allostery did not differ from those measured using equilibrium dialysis. Systematic error in calculated FT vales in females using Vermeulen's model was also significantly reduced. In European Male Aging Study, the men deemed to have low FT (<2.5th percentile) by the new model were at increased risk of sexual symptoms and elevated LH.

Conclusion

Testosterone's binding to SHBG is a multi-step dynamic process that involves complex allostery within SHBG dimer. FT values obtained using the new model have close correspondence with those measured using equilibrium dialysis.

Introduction

Testosterone, the major androgen in humans, circulates in blood bound largely to sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and albumin (Bhasin et al, 2010, Hammond, Bocchinfuso, 1996, Mendel, 1989, Rosner, 1991, Rosner et al, 2007). Testosterone can also bind to orosomucoid and transcortin proteins, but the amount of testosterone bound to these proteins in human plasma is negligible. In many conditions that affect SHBG concentrations, such as obesity, diabetes, aging, hyperthyroidism, liver disease, and HIV-infection, total testosterone concentrations are altered because of changes in SHBG concentrations; in these conditions, expert panels have recommended the determination of free testosterone (FT) concentration to obtain an accurate assessment of androgen status (Bhasin et al, 2010, Hammond, Bocchinfuso, 1996, Mendel, 1989, Rosner, 1991, Rosner et al, 2007).

Reflecting the growing interest in men's health and the success of pharmaceutical advertising, testosterone sales have grown from 23 million dollars in 1993 to 70 million in 2000 to 1.7 billion dollars in 2012 (Spitzer et al., 2012). Testosterone is the second most frequently ordered test, next only to 25-hydroxyvitamin D. In 2012, nearly 4 million free testosterone tests were performed in the USA alone. A number of direct and indirect methods – equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration, tracer analog methods, and calculations based on simple law-of-mass action equations – have been developed for the determination of FT levels (Adachi et al, 1991, Mazer, 2009, Rosner, 1997, Rosner et al, 2007, Sinha-Hikim et al, 1998, Sodergard et al, 1982, Van Uytfanghe et al, 2004, Vermeulen et al, 1971, Vermeulen et al, 1999, Winters et al, 1998). Expert panels have expressed concern about the accuracy and methodological complexity of the available assays for FT (Rosner et al, 2007, Sodergard et al, 1982, Vermeulen et al, 1971). Recognizing these methodological difficulties in the measurement of free testosterone, the Endocrine Society's Expert Panel suggested that “the calculation of free testosterone from reliably measured total testosterone and SHBG using mass action equations provides the best approach for the estimation of free testosterone…” (Rosner et al., 2007). Therefore, algorithms for calculating FT from total testosterone, SHBG and albumin concentrations using the extant linear binding model (also referred to as law-of-mass-action equations) (Adachi et al, 1991, Bhasin et al, 2011, Ly, Handelsman, 2005, Ly et al, 2010, Mazer, 2009, Morales et al, 2012, Morley et al, 2002, Rosner et al, 2007, Sartorius et al, 2009, Sodergard et al, 1982, Vermeulen et al, 1999) or empirically-derived equations (Ly, Handelsman, 2005, Ly et al, 2010, Nanjee, Wheeler, 1985, Sartorius et al, 2009) have been published and used widely (Adachi et al, 1991, Bhasin et al, 2011, Ly, Handelsman, 2005, Ly et al, 2010, Mazer, 2009, Morales et al, 2012, Morley et al, 2002, Rosner et al, 2007, Sartorius et al, 2009).

The current model of testosterone's binding to SHBG assumes that each SHBG dimer binds two testosterone molecules, and that each of the two binding sites on SHBG dimer has similar binding affinity irrespective of the occupancy of the adjacent binding site (no allostery). Equations to determine FT, using this model, have been proposed by Vermeulen, Sodergard, and Mazer (Mazer, 2009, Rosner et al, 2007, Sodergard et al, 1982, Vermeulen et al, 1971). In present work we characterized testosterone's binding to SHBG using equilibrium dialysis (varying ligand and SHBG concentrations) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to characterize testosterone's binding to SHBG. We considered several possible mechanistic models of molecular interactions, including the prevailing model of homogeneous binding of testosterone to SHBG as envisioned by Vermeulen (Vermeulen et al., 1999), Sodergard (Sodergard et al., 1982) and implemented in a spreadsheet by Mazer (Mazer, 2009), and various allosteric mechanisms, including positive and negative cooperativity (Koshland et al, 1966, Monod et al, 1965), and ensemble allostery (Freiburger et al, 2011, Hilser, Thompson, 2007) (Fig. 1). Based on our analyses of the experimental data of testosterone's binding to SHBG, we constructed a novel multistep binding model with complex intra-dimer allostery for the calculation of FT, which provided the best fit to the totality of experimental data. This new model was then utilized to determine FT concentrations in samples derived from randomized testosterone trials in men and women, and to compare the results with those obtained using equilibrium dialysis. Finally, we used the algorithm to examine the distribution of FT levels in community-dwelling men in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) and related the deviations from the mean to the risk of sexual symptoms and elevated LH levels in an independent sample of men in the European Male Aging Study (EMAS).

Section snippets

Biophysical characterization

Human SHBG purified from serum (Binding Site Group, Birmingham, UK, cat# BH089.X) was characterized by protein gel denaturation–renaturation experiments and by measuring its ability to bind testosterone. Testosterone concentration in the SHBG stock solution, measured using LC-MS/MS, was undetectable. Testosterone standard 1.0 mg/mL ± 2% (3.47 mM) was obtained from Cerilliant (Round Rock, TX).

Binding isotherms were established using equilibrium dialysis (varying either testosterone or SHBG

Prevailing model of SHBG:T interaction is erroneous and results in significant deviation in calculated free T

We conducted systematic evaluation of calculated free T values using the extant SHBG:T interaction model (cFTv) in two, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trials in men and women receiving testosterone supplementation (TED and TEAM). Preliminary studies revealed that cFT values obtained using the Vermeulen's equation in samples derived from the TED Trials were systematically lower than those measured by equilibrium dialysis. To determine the molecular basis of this discrepancy, we used

Discussion

Several lines of evidence presented here indicate that the current linear model of testosterone's binding to SHBG (single binding site or two identical, non-interacting binding sites on SHBG) that has formed the basis of Vermeulen, Sodegard, and Mazer's equations to estimate free testosterone concentrations does not accurately explain the experimental data from binding isotherms, ligand depletion experiments, and ITC (after correcting for two binding sites per dimer stoichiometry). While the

Conclusions

In summary, experimental data generated using several independent methods provide evidence of an allosteric mechanism of testosterone binding to SHBG dimer. FT concentrations derived using the new dynamic model incorporating multistep interaction with allostery does not differ significantly from those measured using equilibrium dialysis in men and significantly reduces the systematic deviation in cFT values in women. The application of the new model to clinical trials data has revealed new

References (50)

  • MorleyJ.E. et al.

    Evaluation of assays available to measure free testosterone

    Metabolism

    (2002)
  • PetraP.H. et al.

    Molecular characterization of the sex steroid binding protein (SBP) of plasma. Re-examination of rabbit SBP and comparison with the human, macaque and baboon proteins

    J. Steroid Biochem

    (1986)
  • RosnerW.

    Plasma steroid-binding proteins

    Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am

    (1991)
  • SodergardR. et al.

    Calculation of free and bound fractions of testosterone and estradiol-17 beta to human plasma proteins at body temperature

    J. Steroid Biochem

    (1982)
  • ZakharovM.N. et al.

    Numerical framework to model temporally resolved multi-stage dynamic systems

    Comput. Methods Programs Biomed

    (2012)
  • BhasinS. et al.

    Testosterone therapy in men with androgen deficiency syndromes: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline

    J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab

    (2010)
  • BhasinS. et al.

    Reference ranges for testosterone in men generated using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in a community-based sample of healthy nonobese young men in the framingham heart study and applied to three geographically distinct cohorts

    J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab

    (2011)
  • BhasinS. et al.

    Effect of testosterone supplementation with and without a dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor on fat-free mass in men with suppressed testosterone production: a randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2012)
  • DunnJ.F. et al.

    Transport of steroid hormones: binding of 21 endogenous steroids to both testosterone-binding globulin and corticosteroid-binding globulin in human plasma

    J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab

    (1981)
  • FreiburgerL.A. et al.

    Competing allosteric mechanisms modulate substrate binding in a dimeric enzyme

    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol

    (2011)
  • GrishkovskayaI. et al.

    Crystallization of the N-terminal domain of human sex hormone-binding globulin, the major sex steroid carrier in blood

    Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr

    (1999)
  • GrishkovskayaI. et al.

    Crystal structure of human sex hormone-binding globulin: steroid transport by a laminin G-like domain

    EMBO J.

    (2000)
  • HammondG.L. et al.

    Sex hormone-binding globulin: gene organization and structure/function analyses

    Horm. Res

    (1996)
  • HilserV.J. et al.

    Intrinsic disorder as a mechanism to optimize allosteric coupling in proteins

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2007)
  • HuangG. et al.

    Testosterone dose-response relationships in hysterectomized women with or without oophorectomy: effects on sexual function, body composition, muscle performance and physical function in a randomized trial

    Menopause

    (2014)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Accurate measurement of total and free testosterone levels for the diagnosis of androgen disorders

      2022, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
      Citation Excerpt :

      The linear equations for FT estimation are based on the assumption that each SHBG dimer binds two testosterone molecules and that the two binding sites on SHBG have similar binding affinity; these assumptions are not supported by our current understanding of the dynamics of testosterone's binding to SHBG. cFT values obtained using a multi-step, allosteric ensemble model is much closer to those obtained using equilibrium dialysis [7,49]. The lack of standardization of the equilibrium dialysis method among laboratories has been a barrier to the generation of a harmonized reference range for free testosterone levels; until such rigorously-derived harmonized references ranges become available, the clinicians currently must rely on reference ranges provided by a laboratory [6] or those published from the analyses of large epidemiologic studies [7].

    • History of androgens and androgen action

      2022, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
    • Accurate Measurement and Harmonized Reference Ranges for Total and Free Testosterone Levels

      2022, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      The populations included and the statistical methods used for generating these reference ranges are not published. Reference ranges for free testosterone concentrations estimated using the Ensemble ALlstery Model in male participants of the FHS have been published.28 The distribution of free testosterone concentrations was studied in a reference sample of healthy young male participants (ages 19–40 years; N = 434) of the FHS: Generation 3, who were nonobese and nonsmokers and who did not have a diagnosis of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia.28,39

    • Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypogonadism

      2022, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Department of Health and Human Services, The National Institutes of Health, The National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Natcher Building, Bethesda, MD 20892.

    2

    Current address: Research Program in Men's Health: Aging and Metabolism; Boston Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

    View full text