Elsevier

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volume 88, Issue 8, August 2013, Pages 822-830
Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Original article
Diagnostic Features, Treatment, and Outcomes of Takayasu Arteritis in a US Cohort of 126 Patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.04.025Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To describe the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes in a longitudinal cohort of patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively studied patients with newly diagnosed TAK evaluated from January 1, 1984, through December 31, 2009.

Results

The cohort included 126 patients who were predominantly white (85/103; 82.5%) and female (115/126; 91%). The median age at diagnosis was 31.6 years (interquartile range, 22.9-39.8 years). Median delay in diagnosis was 17.5 months (interquartile range, 7-41.8 months). Thirty-one patients (25%) were 40 years or older at diagnosis. Median delay in diagnosis for patients 40 years or older was 44.8 months compared with 28.3 months for those younger than 40 years (P<.001). Limb claudication was the presenting symptom in 64 of 123 patients (52%). Hata type V arteriographic abnormalities were the most common (57/100; 57%). Renal artery abnormalities were observed in 24 of 41 patients (58%) with new-onset hypertension. Inflammatory markers were elevated at diagnosis in 85 of 119 patients (71%). Vascular interventions were performed in 69 patients (55%). Seventy-nine patients (63%) were followed up for more than 1 year (median follow-up, 5.5 years; interquartile range, 2.9-10.0 years). In this subset, treatment consisted of corticosteroids in 73 patients (92%) and additional immunosuppressants in 52 patients (66%). At 5 years, 96% experienced at least one remission of any duration. The overall survival was 97% at 10 years and 86% at 15 years. Mortality was increased compared with the general population (standardized mortality ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.0-8.9).

Conclusion

There continues to be an unacceptably long delay in the diagnosis of TAK. Awareness of TAK in patients older than 40 years is needed. Morbidity was high despite immunosuppressive treatment. Survival was decreased in this cohort.

Section snippets

Patients and Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, all patients evaluated at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from January 1, 1984, through December 31, 2009, with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for TAK were identified. All medical records were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis. We included patients who met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for TAK.5 Patients 41 to 50 years of age who otherwise met the TAK ACR criteria without fulfilling ACR criteria

Study Cohort

During the study period, 126 patients (91% female; n=115) were diagnosed as having TAK at Mayo Clinic or were evaluated at our institution within 1 year of the diagnosis. The ACR criteria for TAK modified for age were fulfilled in 117 patients (93%). An additional 9 patients (7%) who did not meet modified ACR criteria for TAK but were deemed to have TAK by the study team were also included in this cohort. The demographic characteristics of the cohort are summarized in Table 1.

Clinical Findings at Diagnosis

Symptoms,

Discussion

In this article, we describe the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes in a large cohort of patients with TAK seen at a single tertiary referral center in North America. There is a long delay between symptom onset and diagnosis in patients with TAK. This was especially true in patients older than 41 years. Although remission was achieved in most patients, relapses were common. More than half of the cohort of patients underwent surgical or interventional procedures. Morbidity was high

Conclusion

There continues to be an unacceptable delay in the diagnosis of patients with TAK. Despite similar clinical manifestations at diagnosis, patients 40 years or older had a markedly longer delay in diagnosis than those younger than 40 years. Despite treatment, relapses are common and disease-associated morbidity remains high. Although survival in this cohort was similar to what has been reported in other cohorts of patients with TAK, we observed increased mortality compared with that in the

References (28)

  • K. Maksimowicz-McKinnon et al.

    Limitations of therapy and a guarded prognosis in an American cohort of Takayasu arteritis patients

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2007)
  • M. Vanoli et al.

    Takayasu's arteritis: a study of 104 Italian patients

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2005)
  • H. Ohigashi et al.

    Improved prognosis of Takayasu arteritis over the past decade—comprehensive analysis of 106 patients

    Circ J

    (2012)
  • H. Direskeneli et al.

    Development of outcome measures for large-vessel vasculitis for use in clinical trials: opportunities, challenges, and research agenda

    J Rheumatol

    (2011)
  • Cited by (156)

    • Predictors of relapse in Takayasu arteritis

      2023, European Journal of Internal Medicine
    • Takayasu Arteritis: JACC Focus Seminar 3/4

      2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    • Inflammatory Diseases of the Aorta: JACC Focus Seminar, Part 2

      2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      High C-reactive protein levels and aortic arch involvement are more commonly reported in treatment-resistant TAK. Vascular involvement tends to be progressive, but survival rates >90% are reported at 5 years of follow-up.54 Longer term, the presence of complications (aortic regurgitation, aneurysm, hypertension) and disease progression are major predictors of outcomes at 15 years with survival rates of 68% and 93% for those with and without a progressive course, respectively.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Grant Support: This study was supported by the Mayo Foundation.

    Potential Competing Interests: Dr Schmidt is the recipient of a scholarship from the Conseil Régional de Picardie. Dr Kermani was supported by the Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium, which has received support from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U54AR057319), the National Center for Research Resources (U54 RR019497), and the Office of Rare Diseases Research. The Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium is part of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network.

    View full text