Materials Today
Volume 43, March 2021, Pages 8-16
Journal home page for Materials Today

Research (light blue)
Soft rubber as a magnetoelectric material—Generating electricity from the remote action of a magnetic field

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2020.08.018Get rights and content

Abstract

A magnetoelectric material is capable of converting a magnetic field into electricity. Wireless energy harvesting, drug delivery via remote action, multiple state memories are just some of the possible applications of this phenomenon. The magnetoelectric property is however rare and restricted either to certain hard exotic crystals that satisfy a stringent set of material symmetry constraints or painstakingly fabricated (still hard) composites. Soft materials that are capable of large deformations and are also magnetoelectric, do not exist. In this work, based on a simple mechanism predicated on a coupling facilitated by the universal electromagnetic Maxwell stress, deformability of soft matter and the embedding and stabilization of external charges, we experimentally demonstrate the transformation of silicone rubber into hitherto softest magnetoelectric material. Our material exhibits a room-temperature magnetoelectric coefficient as high as 193mVcm-1Oe-1 at the magnetic field of 600Oe and the low frequency of 1Hz. This rivals the performance of some of the best single phase and composite materials but with a capability of significant deformation.

Introduction

The magnetoelectric (ME) coupling refers to the property of a material to respond electrically when subjected to a change of external magnetic field. Materials exhibiting ME effect have several applications including magnetic sensors, data storage, drug delivery via remote action, and wireless energy harvesting [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Simultaneous existence of both magnetic and electric polarization degrees of freedom in single phase crystals is rare due to both symmetry considerations as well as the mutually contradictory nature of the quantum mechanical aspects of the atomic bonding required for their existence [6], [7]. In addition, the ME coupling of single-phase materials (that do exist), such as BiFeO3, Cr2O3, and YMnO3, is very weak at room temperature [8], [9]. These issues pertaining to single-phase ME materials significantly limit their applications.

To overcome the drawbacks of single-phase ME materials, composites that combine piezoelectric and magnetostrictive materials have been proposed [10], [11], [12], [13]. Originally, BaTiO3 and CoFe2O4 were used in such composites and the ME coupling coefficient was found to be slightly higher than that for single-phase ME materials [10], [14]. Later, Ryu et al. significantly improved the coupling coefficient by proposing a new design for the ME composites. In the new design, a PZT ceramic disc was sandwiched between two Terfenol-D discs [15]. The ME coupling in all these composites originates from the product effect of piezoelectricity and magnetostriction, two phenomena that are commonly observed in piezoelectric and magnetostrictive materials which are invariably (mechanically) hard materials [16], [17]. As shown by the middle sample marked with “ME composites” in Fig. 1, when a magnetic field is applied across a traditional ME composite, mechanical stresses (τ) are induced in its magnetostrictive components and these stresses (marked by white arrays in Fig. 1) are transferred to the neighboring piezoelectric components which in turn generates electricity. In short, the performance of the ME composites critically depends on the properties of the piezoelectric and magnetostrictive components. In the past few decades, efforts are mostly focused on the improvement of these two components [15], [18], [19], [20]. Recently, Annapureddy et al. introduced a Fe-Ga alloy for the magnetostrictive phase and obtained strong ME coupling of the composite [21]. Li et al. successfully brought a new piezoelectric member, molecular-ionic ferroelectrics, to the family of ME composites [22]. Zong et al. replaced the commonly used piezoelectric component, PZT, with cellulose [23]. In order to ensure the high performance, another requirement is that the magnetic field induced stress in the magnetostrictive component should be large enough and efficiently passed to the piezoelectric component. Due to this requirement, magnetic active elastomers (MAE) which exhibit large strain but low stress in magnetic field are usually excluded when designing high performance ME composites [24], [25], [26], [27]. Finally, we remark that although polymers like PVDF are piezoelectric, their electromechanical coupling is quite weak and are ill-suited in the composite world to create a substantive magnetoelectric effect. In addition, at an elastic modulus of nearly 1GPa, PVDF (and materials of its kind) are not truly soft in the sense of large deformations that elastomers are capable of. In other words, truly soft materials which exhibit a substantial magnetoelectric effect do not exist. Thus, a ME material which is biocompatible, environmentally friendly, and able to endure large strain before failure, is critical for biomedical applications.

In this work, we exploit a novel mechanism predicted theoretically by us to engineer magnetoelectricity in ultra soft silicone rubber that is highly deformable and exhibits a magnetoelectric coupling rivaling that of hard composites.

Section snippets

Central idea and guidance from theory

As shown by the sample on the right marked with “ME electrets“ in Fig. 1, a new mechanism is introduced to engineer ME coupling in materials without involving any intrinsic piezoelectric or magnetostrictive material, or a need for passing stresses from one component to the other. The only requirement is to deposit net charges on the interface between two layers of materials which are different in magnetic properties. As we have proposed theoretically, the key idea is based on the introduction

Results and discussion

In this work, the MEE’s two layers are polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) thin film and iron micro-particles embedded silicon rubber (IMESR) plate. Before bonding this two layers together, a layer of surface charge was deposited onto one surface of the PTFE thin film by Corona charging technique. Here, we choose PTFE thin films for two reasons: (1) the relative permeability μr for PTFE is very close to 1 so that it hardly deforms in magnetic field; (2) more importantly, PTFE is a good candidate for

Methods

Measurement of material properties: The Young’s modulus (Y) was obtained through uniaxial tensile tests using univerisal testing machine (Electroforce 3230, TA). The relative permittivity (r) was indirectly obtained by measuring the capacitance C of the sample, and then using the following equation:r=Cd0A,where d and A respectively denote the thickness and the surface erea of the sample. In this work, the capacitance C was measured by an impedance analyzer (Keysight E4990A, America). The

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors KD, XW, QD and SS gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFE0119800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11632014, No 11672222, and No 11372238), and the B1804 project of China. We thank the Instrumental Analysis Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University for their assistance with characterization. P.S was supported by the University of Houston M.D. Anderson Professorship.

Author contributions

Q.D., P. Sharma, and L.P.L. initiated the original idea; K.T and X.W led all the device modeling, design and measurements with the supervision of Q.D and S.S P; K.T analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript with the supervision of Q.D; All authors discussed the results.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References (39)

  • R.E. Newnham et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (1978)
  • X. Guan et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2008)
  • D.Y. Borin et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2019)
  • Y. Zhang

    Nano Energy

    (2019)
  • J. Zhong

    Nano Energy

    (2017)
  • L. Liu

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (2014)
  • J.F. Scott

    Science

    (2007)
  • J.P. Velev et al.

    Proc. R. Soc. A

    (2011)
  • W. Eerenstein et al.

    Nature

    (2006)
  • X.-Z. Chen

    Adv. Mater.

    (2017)
  • V. Annapureddy

    Sustainable Energy Fuels

    (2017)
  • H. Schmid

    Ferroelectrics

    (1994)
  • Nicola A Hill. Why are there so few magnetic ferroelectrics?...
  • J. Wang

    Science

    (2003)
  • D.N. Astrov

    Sov. Phys. JETP

    (1961)
  • J. Van Suchtelen

    Philips Res. Rep

    (1972)
  • C.-W. Nan

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1994)
  • C.-W. Nan

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2008)
  • J. Van Den Boomgaard

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (1974)
  • Cited by (21)

    • In a search for effective giant magnetoelectric coupling: Magnetically induced elastic resonance in Ni-Mn-Ga/P(VDF-TrFE) composites

      2022, Applied Materials Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Oe–1), do not exhibit the aforementioned performance restrictions, once the magnetostrictive fillers are uniformly dispersed in the piezoelectric matrix. Polymer-based ME nanocomposites also offer other technological advantages, namely, room-temperature processing, compatibility with additive manufacturing, environmentally friendly production, and tunable mechanical characteristics that allow the development of flexible and/or large area devices [12,13]. In this way the only drawback of 0–3 PBMM is their low ME coupling (when compared to the laminated counterparts).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text