An experimental study on impact behavior of quasi-isotropic CFRP laminates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.467Get rights and content

Abstract

This work was carried out to bring out the differences in drop weight low velocity impact behavior of two quasi-isotropic (QI) laminates. These laminates were made of AS4/914 carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP). The layup sequence chosen was [0/45/-45/90]2S and [0//90/45/-45]2S. Two types of impactors were employed for the impact tests. One is a hemispherical-end and the other is of a conical-end. Coupon level specimens were supported on all four sides during the impact test. The impact energy was calculated for the laminates and the difference, as a comparison, in each case is presented. It has been observed that the layup sequence has a significant effect on the impact resistance of the laminates under hemispherical impactor. In the case of conical impactor, both the laminates were perforated while absorbing similar energy levels.

Introduction

The high strength to weight ratio and the ability to tailor the material mandates the composite materials in aerospace industries. Initially, the composite materials were used only in the secondary structures of the aircraft components. With the advances in the composite industries, now-a-days, even primary structures are also made by employing the composite materials. Reportedly, there are aircraft made with 50% by weight of composite materials [1]. The aircraft demands for thin skins is to reduce the weight while keeping the performance high. This requires highly efficient structural materials, like, CFRP.

Low velocity impact damage is a concern for aircraft right from taxiing, landing as well as during maintenance. Small debris from the ground may come and hit the wing skin during taxiing and tool drop during maintenance causes these low velocity impact damages. This kind of impact damages are again based on the nature of tool or the debris which are hitting the structures. Either it may have a sharp edge or a smooth blunt edge. The structures may lose up to 50% of their strength when facing low-velocity impact problems due to incidents during manufacturing or maintenance processes [2]. Conventional non-destructive testing techniques fail to detect the barely visible damages or subsurface defects, such as expected during low velocity impacts on CFRP composites.

Impact damage and impact behaviour depend on many parameters such as the impact velocity and energy, projectile/impactor shape, lay-up sequence and boundary conditions [3]. Composite fibre reinforced laminates have various damage modes such as matrix cracking, fibre breakage and delamination. These various damage modes appear together under impact loading [4]. Metals absorb energy in elastic and in plastic regions, whereas composite laminates absorb energy mostly in elastic deformation. Since most composites are brittle, the damage mechanism is not due to plastic deformation. Low velocity impacts can be defined as events, which can occur in the range 1–10 m/s depending on the material properties, projectile mass and stiffness [5]. A drop weight impact testing unit enables the simulation of a wide range of real-world impact conditions and collects detailed performance data [6].

For the low velocity impact test, the end profiles of the impactor/striker usually are blunt, conical or hemispherical. Blunt projectiles cause failure by shear plugging, conical projectiles cause petaling in thin laminates and ductile hole enlargement in thicker laminates, and hemispherical projectiles cause tensile stretching after severe indentation and thinning of the target laminates [7]. The conical projectiles require less perforation energy compared to blunt and hemispherical projectiles [8]. The specimen absorbs more energy when impacted by a conical impactor and hemispherical impactors produce the highest contact force and lowest contact time [9], [10]. The present work is intended to get an appreciation of low velocity impact resistance for both hemispherical and conical impactors with two different QI laminate sequences.

Section snippets

Materials

An aerospace grade carbon UD prepreg AS4/914 grade of 0.15 mm thickness lamina was used to fabricate each laminate with 16 layers [11]. By using autoclave laminate processing cycle two kinds of QI laminates were fabricated [12]. A post curing process was done to relieve the internal stresses developed, if any, during normal curing process. Laminate-1 (L1) has a sequence of [0/45/-45/90]2S and Laminate-2 (L2) has [0/90/45/-45]2S. A diamond wheel cutting machine was employed for defect free

Impact test setup

The impact test setup and the types of impactors used in this work are depicted in Fig. 1. The specimen was supported by 3 mm around all the four sides of the bottom surface and the top surface edges were clamped after placing nylon rubber pads in-between as recommended by ASTM standard [13]. Specimens from both the laminates were tested under impact loading with two different impactors, one is of hemispherical type and the other one is of conical type. It may be noted that the drop weight mass

Impact testing

Fig. 3 shows typical plots of force vs. displacement for both the laminates impacted with hemispherical end as well as conical end impacted specimens. In both the cases height of the impactor was maintained the same as 214 mm for all the specimens. The conical impactor penetrated the laminate while the hemispherical impactor rebounded in both the laminate systems. From Fig. 3(a), it is evident that Laminate-1 can withstand about 8% greater force than Laminate-2 and that the area under the curve

Discussion

The strength of a laminate in out-of-plane load is governed by the interface between the laminae. Since it is responsible in transfer of loads from one laminae to other laminae. The load bearing capacity of laminates can be altered significantly by delamination. The delamination is the function of interface between the laminae-to-laminae, which is again a function of orientation of laminae or laminate layup sequence effect [15]. It is known that ABD matrix governs the loads and strains of any

Conclusions

The layup sequence plays a significant role in impact damage mechanisms of QI laminates. A laminate with a sequence of [0/90/45/-45]2S absorbs more energy than a laminate with a sequence of [0/45/-45/90]2S when impacted by a hemispherical impactor. Keeping drop weight of the impactor, drop height and other boundary conditions similar, a conical impactor causes a visible damage with similar impact energy levels in both the laminates.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

K. Panbarasu: Conceptualization, Investigating, Methodology, Writing original draft. V.R. Ranganath: Formal analysis, Validation,Writing-review and edit. : . Raghu V. Prakash: Supervision, Writing- review and edit.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References (15)

  • A.P. Mouritz

    Introduction to aerospace materials

    (2012)
  • M.O.W. Richardson et al.

    Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials

    Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf.

    (1996)
  • A. Chib

    Parametric study of low velocity impact analysis on composite tubes

    (2006)
  • E.-H. Kim

    Composite damage model based on continuum damage mechanics and low velocity impact analysis of composite plates

    Comp. Str.

    (2013)
  • K.N. Shivakumar et al.

    Prediction of low velocity impact damage in thin circular laminates

    J. Am. Ins. Aer. Ast.

    (1985)
  • N. Mathivanan et al.

    Experimental investigation of low-velocity impact characteristics of woven

    J. Mat. Des.

    (2010)
  • T. Borvik

    Perforation of 12mm thick steel plates by 20mm diameter projectiles with flat, hemispherical and conical noses Part I: Experimental study

    J. Imp. Eng.

    (2002)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text