Role of temperature in 3D printed geopolymers: Evaluating rheology and buildability
Introduction
3D printing technology, generally referred as additive manufacturing, is well-consolidated in many industries but is still incipient for large-scale buildings [1], [2]. The usage of 3D printing in construction offers many advantages when compared to the traditional casting methods, including saving costs and time, and related to environmental aspects. Ecologically correct building processes can be easily introduced with the use of recycled raw materials, such as construction and industrial wastes, as well as minimize waste and dust generation compared to traditional methods. Attempts have been made to merge this technology with eco-friendly materials instead of traditional concretes. Geopolymers are considered the best alternative due to the great reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in their manufacturing process [3]. However, unlike traditional concretes, geopolymers do not meet the rheological requirements for use in the 3D printers as they are extremely sensitive to the water/solid ratio content, to the alkali-activators type, and to the mineral sources [4]. The lesser content of solids and activators, the greater the fluidity and workability, which makes pumping all the way to the printing nozzle easier. On the other hand, excessive fluidity impairs the ability to support the weight of overlapping filaments, i.e., the buildability [5].
The construction size and speed have also to be considered. Highest speeds and smaller construction sizes shorten the time gap between each printed filament, and inevitably a higher structuration rate, or buildability, is required to produce multifilaments [1]. Consequently, intensive efforts have been conducted to find printable mixtures with optimized rheological behavior combining low viscosity during pumping and high yield stress after printing. In the concretes case, this behavior can be achieved with superplasticizers and setting accelerators [1]. In the case of geopolymers, these admixtures are usually inefficient [6], [7] but improvements might be achieved with a heating device coupled to the printhead. Unlike concretes, the paste temperature can be used to effectively control the reaction rate of geopolymers and, consequently, its rheological properties during printing. In this sense, this work evaluates the role of temperature in different metakaolin-based (MK-based) formulations used in the 3D printed geopolymers from the rheological point of view.
Section snippets
Experimental
The metakaolin used was supplied by Metacaulim do Brasil Indústria e Comércio, Brazil, and it is composed by 54.2 SiO2, 34.8 Al2O3, 3.6, K2O, 2.2 Fe2O3, and 1.6 TiO2 (wt%) with a loss on ignition of 3.0%. Its particle size is D10;50;90 = 2.3; 12.9; 56.1 µm, respectively. Two alkali-activators were used: sodium silicate (from Quimidrol, Brazil) composed by 10.8 Na2O, 34.2 SiO2, and 55.0 H2O (in wt%) and 10 M sodium hydroxide solution (Vhtex, Brazil) with 99.9% purity. From these materials, four
Results and discussion
Fig. 2(a) and (b) shows the yield stress evolution and the Vicat needle penetration depth obtained with the geopolymer tested pastes. In Fig. 2(a), the buildable zone where samples were able to be printed is highlighted as range between 350 and 800 Pa. The activators content, as well as the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio and the water content defined the rheological properties of the 3D printed geopolymer pastes. Sample D showed the higher structuration rate and was the unique composition which required
Final considerations
The adequacy of rheology is one of the main challenges of 3D printing of binders. For 3DPG, the usage of temperature is the key to overcome this issue. This study demonstrated how a pre-heating process can be especially useful in 3D printing building projects by allowing to set the desired rheology of MK-based geopolymer pastes independent on the mixing ratio. This approach makes it possible to quickly turn highly-fluid and easily-pumpable admixtures into buildable ones during printing by using
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Marcelo Tramontin Souza: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Lisandro Simão: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Elisângela Guzi de Moraes: Writing - review & editing. Luciano Senff: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. José Renato de Castro Pessôa: Writing - review & editing. Manuel J. Ribeiro: Writing - review & editing, Formal analysis. Antonio Pedro Novaes de Oliveira: Writing - review &
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Project N°CAPES-PRINT/88881.310728/2018-01 and funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). Lastly, Lisandro Simão thanks the Human Resources Program of the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (PRH-ANP) and Financier of Studies and Projects (FINEP) for supporting its work.
References (10)
- et al.
3D printed concrete for large-scale buildings: an overview of rheology, printing parameters, chemical admixtures, reinforcements, and economic and environmental prospects
J. Build. Eng.
(2020) - et al.
Additive manufacturing effect on the mechanical behaviour of architectural stoneware bricks
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2020) - et al.
Sustainable concrete: building a greener future
J. Clean. Prod.
(2018) - et al.
Development of new geopolymers based on stone cutting waste
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2020) - et al.
The study of the structure rebuilding and yield stress of 3D printing geopolymer pastes
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2018)
Cited by (23)
3D printed sustainable low-cost materials for construction of affordable social housing in Brazil: Potential, challenges, and research needs
2024, Journal of Building EngineeringEffect of reactivity of different metakaolin mixtures on geopolymer extrudability
2024, Journal of Building EngineeringEffect of the superplasticizer addition time on the fresh properties of 3D printed limestone calcined clay cement (LC<sup>3</sup>) concrete
2023, Case Studies in Construction MaterialsRheology and pumpability of mix suitable for extrusion-based concrete 3D printing – A review
2023, Construction and Building Materials