Elsevier

Materials Letters

Volume 293, 15 June 2021, 129680
Materials Letters

Role of temperature in 3D printed geopolymers: Evaluating rheology and buildability

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129680Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Geopolymers do not meet the rheology required for pumping and 3D printing.

  • Fluid mixtures are easily pumped but cannot support the weight of the overlapping layers.

  • A systematic heating process can quickly transform fluid mixtures into buildable ones.

Abstract

The mix design of binders with fluidity for pumping and at the same time consistency for printing is one of the most challenging tasks to make 3D printing technology feasible for large-scale buildings. On one hand high-fluid mixtures are better for pumping but on the other hand these do not support the overlapping of layers. For 3D printing geopolymers, this problem can be overcome by manipulating temperature. This work demonstrates how high-fluid mixtures can be quickly turned into buildable ones, continuously, from pumping to printing with a systematic heating process. Insight from this work provides valuable information to easily set the rheology and buildability of 3D printed geopolymers.

Introduction

3D printing technology, generally referred as additive manufacturing, is well-consolidated in many industries but is still incipient for large-scale buildings [1], [2]. The usage of 3D printing in construction offers many advantages when compared to the traditional casting methods, including saving costs and time, and related to environmental aspects. Ecologically correct building processes can be easily introduced with the use of recycled raw materials, such as construction and industrial wastes, as well as minimize waste and dust generation compared to traditional methods. Attempts have been made to merge this technology with eco-friendly materials instead of traditional concretes. Geopolymers are considered the best alternative due to the great reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in their manufacturing process [3]. However, unlike traditional concretes, geopolymers do not meet the rheological requirements for use in the 3D printers as they are extremely sensitive to the water/solid ratio content, to the alkali-activators type, and to the mineral sources [4]. The lesser content of solids and activators, the greater the fluidity and workability, which makes pumping all the way to the printing nozzle easier. On the other hand, excessive fluidity impairs the ability to support the weight of overlapping filaments, i.e., the buildability [5].

The construction size and speed have also to be considered. Highest speeds and smaller construction sizes shorten the time gap between each printed filament, and inevitably a higher structuration rate, or buildability, is required to produce multifilaments [1]. Consequently, intensive efforts have been conducted to find printable mixtures with optimized rheological behavior combining low viscosity during pumping and high yield stress after printing. In the concretes case, this behavior can be achieved with superplasticizers and setting accelerators [1]. In the case of geopolymers, these admixtures are usually inefficient [6], [7] but improvements might be achieved with a heating device coupled to the printhead. Unlike concretes, the paste temperature can be used to effectively control the reaction rate of geopolymers and, consequently, its rheological properties during printing. In this sense, this work evaluates the role of temperature in different metakaolin-based (MK-based) formulations used in the 3D printed geopolymers from the rheological point of view.

Section snippets

Experimental

The metakaolin used was supplied by Metacaulim do Brasil Indústria e Comércio, Brazil, and it is composed by 54.2 SiO2, 34.8 Al2O3, 3.6, K2O, 2.2 Fe2O3, and 1.6 TiO2 (wt%) with a loss on ignition of 3.0%. Its particle size is D10;50;90 = 2.3; 12.9; 56.1 µm, respectively. Two alkali-activators were used: sodium silicate (from Quimidrol, Brazil) composed by 10.8 Na2O, 34.2 SiO2, and 55.0 H2O (in wt%) and 10 M sodium hydroxide solution (Vhtex, Brazil) with 99.9% purity. From these materials, four

Results and discussion

Fig. 2(a) and (b) shows the yield stress evolution and the Vicat needle penetration depth obtained with the geopolymer tested pastes. In Fig. 2(a), the buildable zone where samples were able to be printed is highlighted as range between 350 and 800 Pa. The activators content, as well as the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio and the water content defined the rheological properties of the 3D printed geopolymer pastes. Sample D showed the higher structuration rate and was the unique composition which required

Final considerations

The adequacy of rheology is one of the main challenges of 3D printing of binders. For 3DPG, the usage of temperature is the key to overcome this issue. This study demonstrated how a pre-heating process can be especially useful in 3D printing building projects by allowing to set the desired rheology of MK-based geopolymer pastes independent on the mixing ratio. This approach makes it possible to quickly turn highly-fluid and easily-pumpable admixtures into buildable ones during printing by using

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Marcelo Tramontin Souza: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Lisandro Simão: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Elisângela Guzi de Moraes: Writing - review & editing. Luciano Senff: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. José Renato de Castro Pessôa: Writing - review & editing. Manuel J. Ribeiro: Writing - review & editing, Formal analysis. Antonio Pedro Novaes de Oliveira: Writing - review &

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Project N°CAPES-PRINT/88881.310728/2018-01 and funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). Lastly, Lisandro Simão thanks the Human Resources Program of the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (PRH-ANP) and Financier of Studies and Projects (FINEP) for supporting its work.

Cited by (23)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text