Elsevier

Materials & Design

Volume 134, 15 November 2017, Pages 234-243
Materials & Design

Effects of laser processing parameters on the mechanical properties, topology, and microstructure of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials: A vector-based approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.046Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Additive manufacturing of porous materials using a vector technique is introduced.

  • Empirical relationships are presented for prediction of topological/mechanical properties.

  • Mechanical properties increase with increasing either laser power or scanning time.

  • The effects of laser power and exposure time could be decoupled.

Abstract

Additively manufactured (AM) porous structures are a new class of biomaterials with many advantages as compared to conventionally produced biomaterials. The goal of this study was to find out how the laser processing parameters including laser power and exposure time affect the mechanical properties, topology, and microstructure of porous biomaterials AM using a novel vector-based approach. Several cylindrical porous specimens were additively manufactured using a wide range of exposure time and laser power. The effects of those parameters on the surface roughness, strut diameter, relative density, hardness, elastic modulus, yield stress, first maximum stress, and plateau stress of the porous structures were studied. The results showed that the rate of change in mechanical and topological properties with respect to exposure time was non-linear while it was linear with respect to the laser power. The results also showed that the effects of laser power and exposure time on the mechanical properties and topology of AM porous structures could be decoupled from each other, enabling derivation of predictive emperical relationships. The emperical and experimental curves showed very good agreement, which further validates the validity of the separation method used for obtaining the emperical relationships. The analytical relationships for elastic modulus and yield stress that we had obtained in a previous study could predict the elastic modulus and yield stress of the porous strucutres when the energy input was high enough (i.e. exposure times  450 μs), because the local mechanical properties of the matrix material decreased for the lower levels of energy input. The change in the mechanical properties of the bulk material due to change in laser processing parameters should thus be taken into account.

Introduction

Additively manufactured (AM) porous structures are a new class of biomaterials, which have shown many advantages [1], [2], [3], [4] over conventional biomaterials. Moreover, it is possible to use AM techniques to fabricate patient-specific implants based on the computed tomography (CT) images of each patient. Titanium and its alloys exhibit properties that make them suitable for biomedical applications including a high degree of biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, and durability [5], [6], [7]. Using AM techniques, it is also possible to manufacture interconnected open-cell porous biomaterials with controlled unit cell shape and size. Porous biomaterials have shown several advantages over traditional solid implants. For example, the high degree of porosity in the volume of such structures drastically decreases the stiffness of the metallic implant to the values close to the stiffness of natural bone. The low stiffness of the implant helps in better distributing the mechanical load between implant and natural bone and, thus, assists in avoiding future bone resorption. The hollow space inside porous structures also allows for easy body fluid transport inside the implant [8], [9] and consequently stimulates bone ingrowth, thereby improving implant fixation and longevity.

The most well-known AM techniques for making metallic porous biomaterials are selective laser melting (SLM) [10] and selective electron beam melting (SEBM) [11]. In both techniques, the usual workflow starts off with constructing a surface tessellation language (STL) file describing the geometry of the to-be-manufactured part. The CAD file is then virtually cut into several slices with predefined thicknesses (usually in the range of 30–100 μm [12]). The laser or electron beam then follows the contours found in every slice and melts the specified areas within the powder bed, thereby fusing the powder together and creating a solid part in a layer-by-layer fashion. After the laser/electron beam has scanned the contours found in each layer, the powder bed moves down by the slice thickness and a fresh layer of powder is deposited on the build plate. As a rapid melting-solidification process, the microstructure, topology, and mechanical properties of the resulting part are strongly dependent on the laser/electron beam processing parameters [13], [14], [15], [16], [17].

In the past, a few groups [12], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] have studied the effects of laser beam parameters on the microstructure and the mechanical properties of porous biomaterials. In the previous studies, the 3D constructed CAD files of the porous structure have been used to determine the scanning line of the laser beam. In such techniques (as demonstrated in Fig. 3 of [24]), the 3D model of the structure is constructed in CAD programs. The resulted model is converted into STL file and then sliced by the 3D printer preparation software. Each strut in each layer can consist of several melting paths. In the current study, we use a different, i.e. vector-based, approach to manufacture porous biomaterials. In this approach, the lattice structure is designed by defining the struts as vectors describing its start and end coordinates without any strut diameter data, and thus no STL files are needed to describe the surface of the structure. Slicing to the desired height creates a cloud of intersection points between the vectors and the slice planes. During manufacturing, each intersection point is molten by a single strike of the laser (Fig. 1). In the jumps between the points, the laser is deactivated. The selected power and the exposure time of the laser on each point determines the energy input and, thus, the size of the melt pool and the diameter of the struts constituting the porous structure. This approach has two major advantages over the STL-based technique. First, it removes the intermediates steps required for creating the STL file and slicing the resulting geometry. Those intermediate steps could be computationally expensive and reduce the accuracy of the contours. Second, there is a direct relationship between the processing parameters and the microstructure, topology, and mechanical properties of the resulting porous structure. We studied how the laser processing parameters including laser power and exposure time affect the microstructure, topology, and mechanical properties of the resulting AM porous biomaterials. Porous structures were therefore additively manufactured with a wide range of exposure times and laser powers. The effect of those parameters on the surface roughness, strut diameter, hardness, relative density, elastic modulus, yield stress, first maximum stress, and plateau stress of the porous structures was studied.

Section snippets

Materials and manufacturing

In conventional Powder Bed Fusion processes, the product is built based on a STL-file with all dimensions defined before printing. For lattice structures, the scanning strategy is based on the area of the object on a specific slice plane. Large areas will have a combination of a hatch and a contour while small areas, like struts of several 100 μm will have contours only. In the vector-driven approach, the strut thickness of the lattice structure that is built, is not pre-defined. The

Results

By changing the laser power and exposure time parameters, porous structures with a wide range of strut diameter (155 < d < 276) and relative density (0.06 < μ < 0.46) were manufactured (Fig. 4b–c). The porous structures made by the lowest laser machine parameters (i.e. exposure time of 150 μs and laser powers of 80 W and 96 W) were not completely manufactured and therefore were not suitable for mechanical testing. Therefore, the corresponding strut diameter, relative density, and mechanical property

Discussions

The results of this study demonstrated that the vector-based approach is a viable alternative for STL-based design of AM porous biomaterials. The microstructure and mechanical properties of the matrix material, as indicated by the hardness values within the struts, were similar as long as the laser energy input was high enough. It was therefore possible to achieve porous biomaterials with different porosities, strut diameters, and relative densities simply by modifying the laser processing

Conclusions

In this study, the effects of variation in two main laser processing parameters, namely laser power P and exposure time ts, on the topological parameters and mechanical properties (relative density, surface hardness, elastic modulus, yield stress, plateau stress, and first maximum stress) were investigated. It was found that all the noted mechanical properties increase with increasing either laser power or exposure time. Therefore, among the 36 types of porous structure manufactured in this

References (44)

  • B. Zhang et al.

    Effects of processing parameters on properties of selective laser melting Mg–9% Al powder mixture

    Mater. Des.

    (2012)
  • E. Sallica-Leva et al.

    Microstructure and mechanical behavior of porous Ti–6Al–4V parts obtained by selective laser melting

    J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.

    (2013)
  • L.-E. Loh et al.

    Numerical investigation and an effective modelling on the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) process with aluminium alloy 6061

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2015)
  • S. Ahmadi et al.

    Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells

    J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.

    (2014)
  • M. Simonelli et al.

    Effect of the build orientation on the Mechanical Properties and Fracture Modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2014)
  • S.L. Sing et al.

    Selective laser melting of lattice structures: a statistical approach to manufacturability and mechanical behavior

    Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf.

    (2018)
  • R. Hedayati et al.

    Mechanical properties of regular porous biomaterials made from truncated cube repeating unit cells: analytical solutions and computational models

    Mater. Sci. Eng. C

    (2016)
  • G. Campoli et al.

    Mechanical properties of open-cell metallic biomaterials manufactured using additive manufacturing

    Mater. Des.

    (2013)
  • R. Hedayati et al.

    Computational prediction of the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials

    Int. J. Fatigue

    (2016)
  • E. Wycisk et al.

    Effects of defects in laser additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V on fatigue properties

    Phys. Procedia

    (2014)
  • S. Babaee et al.

    Mechanical properties of open-cell rhombic dodecahedron cellular structures

    Acta Mater.

    (2012)
  • A.A. Zadpoor et al.

    Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterials, Tissues, and Organs

    (2017)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Applications of 3D printing in medicine: A review

      2024, Annals of 3D Printed Medicine
    • On the characterization of roughness and geometrical irregularities of additively manufactured single titanium-alloy struts

      2022, Additive Manufacturing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Staircase thickness, semi-melted powder particles, and open pores are the most common features that account for the surface texture of the components [5]. These arise from the dynamics of the melt pool and heat transfer conditions, which in turn depends on a variety of parameters such as the deposited energy and beam speed, hatching pattern, powder granulometry, layer thickness, recoating system, and surface orientation relative to the beam [6–11]. As for the latter, it is well known that upward oriented surfaces are slightly smoother thanks to the melt pool being dragged downward by gravity and capillarity forces [12].

    • Anisotropy-inspired, simulation-guided design and 3D printing of microlattice metamaterials with tailored mechanical-transport performances

      2022, Composites Part B: Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      For [001], [110], and [111] diamond microlattice metamaterials, the results obtained from analytical and FE predicted approaches are consistent with identical trends and low-grade deviation. Young's moduli obtained by both methods are compared with traditional diamond lattices [18,47,48], strut-based diamond TPMS [49], and sheet-based [50] diamond lattices, respectively. The plots show that the moduli data coincides with previous literature, indicating the availability of both methods.

    • Quality of AM implants in biomedical application

      2022, Quality Analysis of Additively Manufactured Metals: Simulation Approaches, Processes, and Microstructure Properties
    • Lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusion

      2021, Fundamentals of Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Metals
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text