Preparation and characterisation of nanocrystalline IrxSn1−xO2 electrocatalytic powders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.04.039Get rights and content

Abstract

Nanocrystalline oxide powders of the type IrxSn1−xO2 (0.2x1) have been produced and characterised. These oxides have been developed primarily as oxygen evolution electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysers. Two methods were used to produce the oxide materials: the modified polyol method and the Adams fusion method. X-ray diffraction analysis suggests that an iridium–tin oxide solid solution with a rutile structure can be produced using the modified polyol method, with a linear relationship between the lattice parameters and composition. The crystal size of the solid solution phase is below 15 nm for all compositions. The Adams fusion method results in at least two separate oxide phases, namely a tin rich oxide and an iridium rich oxide. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis revealed no significant difference between the bulk and surface compositions, and that the iridium was present in at least two valent states. The electrical resistivity of the powders was compared, and an exponential increase in resistivity with tin addition was found. Overall the resistivity measurements suggest that the limit for tin addition is around 50–60 mol% due to the high ohmic losses expected at higher tin contents in a PEM water electrolyser.

Introduction

Proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysers have been shown to be a promising method of producing carbon free hydrogen [1]. Recently, IrO2based materials have been examined as the anode or oxygen evolution electrode at our group [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. In this work the preparation and structural characterisation of IrxSn1−xO2(0.2x1) nanocrystalline powders is investigated. In particular, two methods for producing noble metal based oxides are compared based on X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis and electrical conductivity measurements.

Noble metal oxides as electrocatalysts (particularly IrO2 and RuO2) are well established in many industrial electrochemical processes in the form of dimensionally stable anodes (DSA) as developed by Beer [7]. Most DSA electrodes are prepared by thermal decomposition of metal precursors onto titanium substates. This method is thought to be unsuitable for PEM water electrolysers due to the difficulty in obtaining good contact between the electrocatalytic layer and the membrane electrolyte. Therefore, to obtain an electrocatalytic layer on the membrane, either pre-prepared powders may be applied as an ink to the membrane [8], [9] or electrocatalytic particles can be synthesised directly on the surface or within the membrane [10], [11]. In our laboratory we normally use an ink-spray method, so have been concentrating on preparing noble metal based oxide powders.

Many methods are available for the synthesis of noble metal based oxides. The Adams fusion method [12] has been widely used to produce fine noble metal oxide powders [2], [3], [4], [5], [13], and is based on the oxidation of metal precursors in a molten nitrate melt. Sol-gel methods have also proved useful in producing noble metal based oxides [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], however precursor type can effect the properties of the material [18] as can the solvent removal stage [19]. Preparation of metal oxides by thermal or chemical oxidation of metallic colloids is an interesting concept as there exists a wide range of methods to synthesise such colloids [20], [21]. The polyol method is a relatively simple way to synthesise nanosized noble metal colloids such as iridium or ruthenium [22], [23], by the reduction of metal precursors in ethylene glycol. Our additional steps include the separation of the metallic colloids from the ethylene glycol by centrifugation, followed by thermal oxidation at elevated temperatures in air.

Previously it has been shown that SnO2 improves the stability of IrO2–RuO2 anodes in PEM water electrolysers [13]. It has also been suggested that SnO2does not reduce that activity of RuO2 as much as TiO2[24], [25]. For these reasons, additions of SnO2to IrO2 has been investigated.

Section snippets

Modified polyol method

Metal precursors (H2IrCl6⋅4H2O1 and SnCl2⋅2H2O2 ) were added to ethylene glycol to achieve a total metal concentration of 1.67×102  mol l−1. The glycol-precursor solution was then heated under a nitrogen atmosphere to the refluxing temperature and magnetically stirred for 2 h by which time a colloid had formed. The pH of this colloid–glycol mixture was then normally adjusted to pH 2.5 by the addition of 0.1 M NaOH solution and

Modified polyol method

On addition of the metal precursors to the ethylene glycol, the measured pH was seen to range from 0.15 to 0.2, with the pH increasing linearly with increasing tin content. The colour of the solution was observed as the glycol mixture was heated (Table 1). Similar observations have been made during ruthenium synthesis by this method [27].

The colour changes are suggested to be due to the exchange or loss of ligands from the precursor complexes. After 2 h of refluxing, the measured pH was 0.83

Conclusions

The crystal properties of IrxSn1−xO2 powders, depend on the method used to prepare such materials. Adams fusion method results in an oxide consisting of at least two separate oxide phases, with one of these containing mostly SnO2. The modified polyol method is believed to form a solid solution between iridium and tin oxide, with the lattice parameters increasing linearly with tin content. Addition of tin also causes the average crystal size to increase from around 3.5 to 15 nm. XPS clearly

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Norwegian Research Council and Norsk Hydro ASA.

References (38)

  • E. Rasten et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2003)
  • H. Takenaka et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (1982)
  • Y. Murakami et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1994)
  • Y. Murakami et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1994)
  • T. Lassali et al.

    J. Non-Cryst. Solids

    (2000)
  • F. Bonet et al.

    NanoStruct. Mater.

    (1999)
  • L. Kurihara et al.

    NanoStruct. Mater.

    (1995)
  • S. Trasatti

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1991)
  • A. Miyazaki et al.

    Chem. Lett.

    (1998)
  • S. Ardizzone et al.

    Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1996)
  • M. Rubel et al.

    Vacuum

    (1994)
  • F. Reames

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (1976)
  • C. Mallika et al.

    Thermochim. Acta

    (2001)
  • L.J. Atanasoska et al.

    Vacuum

    (1990)
  • R. Oberlin, M. Fischer, Proceedings of the Sixth World Hydrogen Energy Conference on Hydrogen Energy Progress VI,...
  • E. Rasten, Electrocatalysis in Water Electrolysis with Solid Polymer Electrolyte, Ph.D. thesis, NTNU, Trondheim,...
  • E. Rasten, G. Hagen, R. Tunold, Proc. Energy and Electrochemical Processes for a Cleaner Environment 1991,...
  • A. Marshall et al.
  • A. Marshall et al.

    J. New. Mat. Electrochem. Syst.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (141)

    • First-principles study of oxygen evolution on Co<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> with short-range ordered Ir doping

      2023, Molecular Catalysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, because the extremely sluggish kinetics of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the anode, overall water splitting was hindered at a practical level [6]. Currently, IrO2 was the only known industrial OER electrocatalyst [7–10]. However, it was difficult to implement large-scale production and use of such catalysts because precious metals were inherently scarce and expensive (iridium US$60,670 kg−1) [11].

    • Fully anhydrous HCl electrolysis using polybenzimidazole membranes

      2022, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
    • Photodeposited IrO<inf>2</inf> on TiO<inf>2</inf> support as a catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction

      2021, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nevertheless, nowadays IrO2 is used as a typical anode electrocatalyst for water electrolysis. The most common methods reported in the literature for the synthesis of nanosized IrO2 catalysts are the Adams fusion method [10–13], sol–gel methods [14–16], a modified polyol method [17,18], hydrolysis [19], while those of subsequent electrode preparation include spray deposition [20], thermal decomposition [21,22] and sputtering [23]. Using appropriate catalyst supports could improve catalyst utilization [24] and the stability of catalyst layers with reduced loading of the precious Ir metal [25].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Deceased.

    View full text