Quantitative multiscale correlative microstructure analysis of additive manufacturing of stainless steel 316L processed by selective laser melting
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Stainless steel is an essential material for modern society as it is used for various applications in the automotive and transportation sector, construction, medicine, energy and heavy industries and food preparation and handling. Among the different types of steel, austenitic AISI 316L stainless steel (316L SS) is one of the most common materials for engineering applications due to its good corrosion resistance and good mechanical properties [1,2]. Most of the 316L SS final products are produced by cold rolling or forging in order to strengthen the final engineering parts. However, the demand for increasingly complex steel structures of smaller dimensions that can be manufactured with fewer technological steps led to the development of various additive-manufacturing (AM) techniques [[3], [4], [5], [6]]. The advantages of these AM approaches are the high degree of design freedom as well as the resource and production process efficiency compared to conventional processes. This enables the tool-free manufacturing of highly complex components [7].
The two general approaches to the AM of metals according to the ISO/ASTM 529000:2017 standard are direct-energy deposition (DED) and powder-bed fusion. While the former allows the direct reconstruction and repair of deteriorated parts and is a faster method, only the latter permits the manufacturing of complex shapes and yields a finer and less porous microstructure. In the powder-bed fusion manufacturing, a 3D object is formed layer-by-layer from a metal powder feedstock that is selectively melted by a high-energy laser source or electron beam. The produced part is then consolidated in subsequent cooling. There are several commercial names for this process. The one where a laser source is used to selectively melt the powder is called selective laser melting (SLM) [8,9].
In contrast to traditional metallurgical routes, 316L SS produced by SLM can achieve better mechanical properties, particularly tensile strength and hardness [[10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. The SLM process can also promote unique microstructures where the trade-off between tensile strength and ductility can be overcome [17]. The reported extraordinary mechanical properties of SLM-manufactured 316L SS are said to be related to the fine-grained microstructure, additional small-scale compositional variations and the formation of sub-grain structures with nano-inclusions [11,[17], [18], [19]]. All of these phenomena are linked to the initial laser-powder interaction process. Rapid melting and subsequent solidification causes the formation of non-equilibrium conditions in the melt-pool regions. This promotes the development of a fine microstructure and the appearance of a large amount of dislocations, particularly in the form of elongated cells [13,17,19]. Due to the different temperature gradients and heat-flux directions during the solidification process, different regions of the melt pool crystallize differently [20]. Consequently, dislocation cell structures have not been observed in the whole sample [17,18]. Y.M Wang et al. [17] proposed that the main contribution to the yield strength is made by this cellular dislocation structure, according to Hall-Petch-type strengthening behaviour. In some studies, the observed nano-inclusions were considered to act according to the Orowan strengthening model. Wang and co-authors estimated by calculations, however, that the pinning of dislocations by these inclusions delivers only a minor contribution to the overall material's strengthening. Saeidi et al. [19] and Springer et al. [21], on the other hand, connected the improved strengthening of the SLM-manufactured material with the observed nano-inclusion formation in the presence of a partial oxygen pressure.
The aim of our study is to contribute to the further understanding of the microstructures vs. property relationship of SLM 316L SS manufactured without strengthening additives [[22], [23], [24], [25]] under industrial conditions. To this end, along with mechanical testing, the produced material's microstructure was studied on different length scales from the macroscopic observation of the melt pools to the state-of-the-art scanning and transmission electron microscopy observations of the material's structure on the nanoscale. The material's texture, the melt-pool boundary structure and composition, the formation of the dislocation network, the calculated number of dislocations and the influence of the nano-inclusions are discussed in connection with measurements of the tensile strength.
Section snippets
Experimental procedures
AM samples of a size of 30 × 30 × 30 mm3 were built in an industrial machine (EOSINT M280) from the company EOS, using a commercial process named DLMS (direct laser metal sintering). DLMS is actually a form of SLM and belongs to the bed-fusion processes according to ISO/ASTM 529000:2017. The AM parameters were set to those proposed by the manufacturer and were as follows: laser power 285 W, laser speed 960 mm/s. The distance between the laser paths was 0.11 mm, with a laser diameter of
Microstructure vs. mechanical properties
The microstructure of the steels, as well as their mechanical properties, is known to be affected by the manufacturing method. A comparison of the microstructures of AM, as-cast and forged steel samples is shown in Fig. 1. It can be seen that the AM industrial manufacturing procedure results in characteristic reversed-bell-like grains.
The light microscope image (Fig. 1 a inset) shows a clear indication of the melt pools produced by the laser melting of the precursor powder. The melt-pool
Discussion
In Fig. 8 (a), a dendrite-like part of the microstructure images by SEM-ECCI is shown. The structure develops hierarchically. The nucleation starts sporadically at the bottom of the melt pool, where the grain either follows the same orientation or develops a different one. The elongated dendrites grow mostly in the deposition direction, which correlates with the direction of the heat gradient. The dendrite distribution in the bell-shaped grain is rather radial (Fig. 8 b). Due to the complex
Conclusions
In this investigation we have clearly demonstrated the correlations between the mechanical and the structural properties of AM-processed 316L stainless steel. The applied industrial processing parameters, where the laser power was set to 285 W, the laser speed to 960 mm/s, the laser diameter to 0.055 mm, the laser paths to 0.11 mm, and in a 99.5% purity nitrogen atmosphere, gave rise to the defined dislocation-cells microstructure that was spread over the whole volume of the produced material.
Declaration of competing interest
None.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding No. P2-0132).
Data availability
The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to technical or time limitations.
References (33)
- et al.
Characteristics of mechanical properties and microstructure for 316L austenitic stainless steel
J. Iron Steel Res. Int.
(2011) - et al.
Additive manufacturing of metallic materials: a review
J. Mater. Eng. Perform.
(2018) - et al.
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Compos. Part B Eng.
(2018) - et al.
On the fatigue crack growth behavior in 316L stainless steel manufactured by selective laser melting
Eng. Fract. Mech.
(2014) - et al.
Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials
Appl. Mater. Today
(2017) - et al.
Effects of process time interval and heat treatment on the mechanical and microstructural properties of direct laser deposited 316L stainless steel
Mater. Sci. Eng. A-STRUCTURAL Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process.
(2015) - et al.
Intragranular cellular segregation network structure strengthening 316L stainless steel prepared by selective laser melting
J. Nucl. Mater.
(2016) - et al.
Effect of selective laser melting (SLM) process parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L austenitic stainless steel
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
(2017) - et al.
Investigation of effects of process parameters on microstructure and hardness of SLM manufactured SS316L
J. Alloys Compd.
(2018) - et al.
Correlation between process parameters, microstructure and properties of 316 L stainless steel processed by selective laser melting
Mater. Sci. Eng. A-STRUCTURAL Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process.
(2018)
Structure/property (constitutive and spallation response) of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
Acta Mater.
Investigation of crystal growth mechanism during selective laser melting and mechanical property characterization of 316L stainless steel parts
Mater. Des.
Efficient additive manufacturing production of oxide- and nitride-dispersion-strengthened materials through atmospheric reactions in liquid metal deposition
Mater. Des.
Novel TiB2-reinforced 316L stainless steel nanocomposites with excellent room- and high-temperature yield strength developed by additive manufacturing
Compos. PART B-ENGINEERING.
Densification behavior, microstructural evolution, and mechanical properties of TiC/316L stainless steel nanocomposites fabricated by selective laser melting
Mater. Des.
Thermal behavior of the molten pool, microstructural evolution, and tribological performance during selective laser melting of TiC/316L stainless steel nanocomposites: experimental and simulation methods
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
Cited by (153)
Multiscale characterisation study on the effect of heat treatment on the microstructure of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
2024, Materials Today CommunicationsTriple structuration and enhanced corrosion performance of 316L in laser powder bed fusion
2024, Corrosion Science