Elsevier

LWT

Volume 108, July 2019, Pages 129-136
LWT

Volatile fingerprinting differentiates diverse-aged craft beers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.03.044Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Different ageing strategies led to distinct volatile fingerprints.

  • Beers were separated in clusters relating production strategy with volatile composition.

  • Wine volatiles were transferred to aged beers by barrel reuse.

  • Volatile fingerprinting is a tool for dealing with sample heterogeneity in beer analysis.

Abstract

Beer ageing on wood is a complex and difficult to control process involving several reactions and compounds. Difficulties in understanding the underlying phenomena often lead to empirical and unpredictable processes and heterogeneous products. This work resorts to volatile fingerprinting along with multivariate analysis as tools to differentiate and highlight differences in beers derived from diverse production processes. Volatile composition of beers originating from barrel ageing processes and unaged beer were analyzed by GC-MS. The collected data was processed by principal component analysis, which allowed the evaluation of relations between samples and volatile compounds. Beers were distinguished by clusters comprising different groups of volatiles. Beer with the longest period in barrel was in the cluster with the most volatiles. Beer produced by resident barrel microbiota fermentation was characterized by presence of Brettanomyces sp. metabolites. Beer aged in barrel by a shorter time period showed characteristic content of ethyl esters and oak extractives. Beer produced in inox vat and beer fermented in barrel with pitching of S. cerevisiae appeared in the same cluster, relating with fermentative esters. Volatile fingerprinting was a viable approach to characterize and distinguish the analyzed beers, providing relevant information regarding the impact of production methodologies in volatile composition.

Introduction

Ageing of beverages in oak barrels is a common practice and is widely recognized for improving stability and organoleptic properties of the final product. During contact, several phenomena occur which impact beverage composition, namely the extraction of wood compounds, evaporation of beverage volatile compounds, oxidation of compounds in the beverage, and reaction between wood and beverage components (Mosedale & Puech, 1998). Extraction of volatiles from oak barrels depends mainly on wood extractible content, contact time, cellar conditions and beverage composition (Chira & Teissedre, 2014). Barrel usage is a crucial factor for ageing. The pool of extractable oak compounds is finite and the rate and amounts of compounds extracted diminish as the barrel is used in successive years (Wilkinson, Li, Grbin, & Warren, 2013). Furthermore, casks also retain compounds from the beverages aged in them, due to sorption of beverages components. As shown, oak wood retains compounds from the aged beverages, which can be transferred from one beverage to another through the reuse of the cask (Coelho, Domingues, Teixeira, Oliveira, & Tavares, 2019). Presence of lees in the cask can also take part on enhancing sensorial characteristics of alcoholic beverages, leading to higher body and aroma complexity as acknowledged in wine production (Del Barrio-Galán, Pérez-Magariño, & Ortega-Heras, 2011). Therefore, volatile composition of the aged beverage is influenced not only by the previously referred reactions occurring in the barrel but also by transference of compounds from one matrix to another, with the barrel posing as a vector for carrying such compounds and aromatic properties. Additionally, when envisaging beverages such as wine or beer, biological transformations occur during barrel ageing which furthermore modify chemical and sensory properties. Casks are often populated with microorganisms that alter significantly the beverage composition. Bacteria, such as Lactobacillus sp. and Enterobacter sp. and wild yeasts such as Brettanomyces sp., Debaryomyces sp. and Candida sp. can be found in wood and wine barrels with impact on beverage composition (Spitaels et al., 2014). Whilst mainly considered as spoilage organisms responsible for off-flavor production in wine, an increasing number of authors report that these endogenous microbes can add beneficial (or at least interesting) aromas that increase the flavor complexity of fermented beverages. On this field, Brettanomyces sp. strains are rising in importance, due to the ability to produce volatile compounds that enhance sensory properties of beer (Serra Colomer, Funch, & Forster, 2019). Several beer styles traditionally produced by fermentation in barrel rely on typical Brettanomyces sp. flavors such as seen for Lambic beers (Steensels et al., 2015) and Belgian red-brown acidic ales (Snauwaert et al., 2016).

With an increasing market which strives for innovative specialty products, mainly in craft beer, barrel ageing has been applied at great extent. Variables such as wood type and origin, presence of lees, resident barrel microbiota and ageing conditions lead to a large number of possible combinations to be performed. With such extent of variables to be manipulated and taking into account the multitude of compounds involved in beer sensory characteristics, ageing results are often unpredictable lead to heterogeneous products in regard to their chemical composition and sensory characteristics. In the case of wine, which has also complex composition, fingerprinting methodologies have been applied as omics tools for the discrimination, identification and quality control of dissimilar samples (Laaks, Letzel, Schmidt, & Jochmann, 2012) and for the investigation of the importance and effect of wine volatiles (González Álvarez, González-Barreiro, Cancho-Grande, & Simal-Gándara, 2011).

The aim of this work was the application and evaluation of volatile fingerprinting along with multivariate analysis as a tool to discriminate and characterize differences in barrel diverse-aged beers.

Section snippets

Samples

Beer samples were kindly provided by “Fermentum – Engenharia das Fermentações Lda.”, originating from “Letra” craft brewery. All samples originated from the same Belgian Dark Strong Ale wort with a specific gravity of 21 in the Plato scale (°P), leading to a beer with bitterness (IBU) of 27 and ethanol concentration, by volume, of 9%. Wort was fermented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae 1762 Belgian Abbey II (Wyeast Laboratories Inc.), pitched according with the instructions of the supplier, with

Results and discussion

Analysis and characterization of beers was conducted in order to highlight differences between ageing strategies and their corresponding impact on chemical profile. As seen in Fig. 2, ethanol concentration in barrel aged beers was significantly higher when compared with the unaged beer. Firstly, contact with Port wine lees (previously aged in the same barrels) can provide additional ethanol, considering that fortified wines contain alcoholic strength by volume between 19% and 21% (Tredoux &

Conclusions

Characterization of the barrel aged beers allowed the determination of the chemical differences between the beer samples as well as the impact of barrel reuse on beer ageing. Such was seen for the absence or pitching of S. cerevisiae, where wort fermented in barrel by endogenous microflora related strongly with 4-ethylphenol and 4-ethylguaiacol in the volatile fingerprint (typical Brettanomyces/Dekkera metabolites), which was less noticeable for wort also fermented in cask but with yeast

Acknowledgements

This work had funding support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the strategic funding of UID/BIO/04469/2019 unit and COMPETE 2020 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684) and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 – Programa Operacional Regional do Norte. Fermentum – Engenharia das Fermentações Lda. also participated in co-funding and supplying materials for this work.

References (34)

  • J.A. Pérez-Serradilla et al.

    Role of lees in wine production: A review

    Food Chemistry

    (2008)
  • M. Serra Colomer et al.

    The raise of Brettanomyces yeast species for beer production

    Current Opinion in Biotechnology

    (2019)
  • I. Snauwaert et al.

    Microbial diversity and metabolite composition of Belgian red-brown acidic ales

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2016)
  • J. Steensels et al.

    Brettanomyces yeasts - from spoilage organisms to valuable contributors to industrial fermentations

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2015)
  • R. Suárez et al.

    The production of ethylphenols in wine by yeasts of the genera Brettanomyces and Dekkera: A review

    Food Chemistry

    (2007)
  • J.-N. Boidron et al.

    Influence du bois sur certaines substances odorantes des vins

    OENO One

    (1998)
  • D.E. Briggs et al.

    Brewing : Science and practice

    (2004)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Volatile terpenoid profiling in gin and beer – A targeted approach

      2023, Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
    • Bioactive compounds, antioxidant activities and flavor volatiles of lager beer produced by supplementing six jujube cultivars as adjuncts

      2022, Food Bioscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      The total content of esters in final beers fermented by jujube supplementation was approximately twice of control beer. Octanoic acid, deriving from yeast metabolism during alcohol fermentation (Coelho et al., 2019), represented the major acid in final beers, except beers fermented with the addition of HT, GT, and JS. Two acids, namely isobutyric acid and heptanoic acid, appeared in final beers fermented by jujube supplementation, which are the sensory compounds related with butter, cheese and sour.

    • Evaluation of multi-starter S. cerevisiae/ D. bruxellensis cultures for mimicking and accelerating transformations occurring during barrel ageing of beer

      2020, Food Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      One example of specialty products are barrel aged beers, produced either by fermentation of wort in wood barrels or by storage of previously fermented beer in wood casks. During contact with wood several phenomena occur: wood compounds are extracted by the hydroalcoholic matrix (additive ageing), beverage compounds are adsorbed by wood (subtractive ageing), oxidative and polymerization reactions (chemical ageing) and, more importantly, a secondary fermentation takes part (biological ageing), transforming chemical and sensorial characteristics of the product (Coelho, Magalhães, et al., 2019). In most barrel aged beers, this secondary fermentation is the result of the spontaneous growth of microbial population, mostly endogenous to the barrel or populating the brewery atmosphere (Spitaels et al., 2014).

    • Development of a stir bar sorptive extraction method to study different beer styles volatile profiles

      2019, Food Research International
      Citation Excerpt :

      The volatile compounds determined in highest concentrations were 3-methyl-1-butanol followed by phenylethyl alcohol, presenting values in ale beers around 100 mg/L and 20 mg/L, respectively. Similar results were obtained by other authors that reported those compounds as the major volatile alcohols found in ale beers (Coelho et al., 2019). Comparing the different types of beers, on the one hand, some compounds such as ethyl isovalerate, α-terpinolene, linalool, hexanoic acid, or guaiacol were found in significant higher concentrations in ale beers, compared to the rest of beer styles.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text