Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 141, March 2020, Pages 9-13
Lung Cancer

Osimertinib treatment for patients with EGFR exon 20 mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.12.013Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

Objectives

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions comprise 4–10 % of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are associated with primary resistance to first and second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In vitro and preclinical animal studies have shown that osimertinib exerts antitumor activity against EGFR exon 20 mutation positive NSCLC. We report on a cohort of advanced stage NSCLC patients who harbor an EGFR exon 20 mutation and received osimertinib treatment.

Material and methods

Twenty-one patients were treated with osimertinib 80 or 160 mg once daily from April 2016 to June 2018, in four institutions in the Netherlands. Data were obtained retrospectively. Progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) were assessed using RECIST v1.1.

Results

Thirteen patients received prior platinum-based chemotherapy, and three patients a first – or second generation EGFR TKI. We observed 1 partial response, 17 patients with stable disease and 3 with progressive disease as best response to osimertinib (ORR 5 %). Median PFS was 3.6 (95 % CI, 2.6–4.5) months. PFS did not differ for patients with co-occurring TP53 mutations (p = 0.937). The DCR at three months was 71 %. Median OS was 8.7 (95 % CI, 1.1–16.4) months.

Conclusion

Osimertinib has limited antitumor activity in patients with EGFR exon 20 mutated NSCLC, with an ORR of 5 %.

Introduction

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations are identified as a subset (4–12 %) of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are the third most common category of EGFR activating mutations [[1], [2], [3]]. EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations are heterogeneous at the molecular level but can be characterized as in-frame duplications (dup) or insertions (ins), or deletion/insertion (delins) mutations. EGFR exon 20 insertions are EGFR driver mutations that exhibit intrinsic resistance to first and second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with overall response rates of only 3–8 % [1,3]. In contrast to the common EGFR exon-19 deletion and L858R point mutations, EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations alter the α-C helix resulting in steric hindrance of the drug-binding pocket, that prevents binding of first and second generation EGFR TKIs [3,4]. Given the limited activity of first and second generation EGFR TKIs, new treatment options are needed to overcome primary resistance of EGFR directed treatment for tumors harboring an EGFR exon 20 insertion. Data about effectiveness of third generation EGFR TKIs are conflicting in pre-clinical studies. In vivo, in vitro and 3D modeling by Robichaux et al. showed that osimertinib lacks activity against cell lines harboring an EGFR exon 20 insertion, due to steric hindrance as a result of significant changes within the drug-binding pocket [4]. In contrast, a study by Floc’h et al. described anti-tumor activity of osimertinib across xenograft models, representing a variety of EGFR exon 20 insertions [5], in line with a previous report presenting in vitro activity of osimertinib in exon 20 insertion mutant cell lines [6]. Limited clinical data are available. Two cases with a clinical response to osimertinib have been published [7,8]. Recently, Fang et al. treated six Chinese patients with an EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation with osimertinib. This resulted in a median progression free survival (PFS) of 6.2 months [9]. Here, we report on a cohort of advanced stage EGFR exon 20 mutation positive NSCLC patients that were treated with osimertinib.

Section snippets

Material and methods

Twenty-one patients with advanced stage NSCLC harboring an EGFR exon 20 mutation were treated with osimertinib in four institutions in the Netherlands (Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Amsterdam UMC and Erasmus Medical Center). Data were obtained retrospectively. We started a search by identifying all patients treated with osimertinib from April 2016 to June 2018 in the four institutions. Then we selected the patients with an EGFR

Patient and tumor characteristics

Patient and tumor characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Median age was 63 years (range 38–82), 67 % of patients were female and median number of prior systemic treatments was 1 (range 0–3). Thirteen patients (62 %) received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Three patients were treated with a first or second generation EGFR TKI, erlotinib (n = 1) or afatinib (n = 2); one patient experienced stable disease (SD) for 11 months after having received afatinib, while the other two patients had

Discussion

EGFR exon 20 insertions represent a heterogeneous group of genomic aberrations with an unmet clinical need in precision oncology. EGFR exon 20 insertions after residue 764 are resistant to first and second generation EGFR TKIs [1]. Data about effectiveness of third generation EGFR TKIs are limited. Our series describes the results of osimertinib treatment, a third generation EGFR TKI, in 21 patients with advanced stage NSCLC harboring an EGFR exon 20 mutation. Despite the low response rate of 5

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study shows that osimertinib 80 mg once daily has limited antitumor activity in patients with EGFR exon 20 mutated NSCLC, with an ORR of 5 %.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

B. van Veggel: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Methodology. J.F. Vilacha Madeira R Santos: Writing - review & editing. S.M.S. Hashemi: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. M.S. Paats: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. K. Monkhorst: Writing - review & editing. D.A.M. Heideman: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. M. Groves: Writing - review & editing. T. Radonic: Writing - review & editing. E.F. Smit: Conceptualization,

Declaration of Competing Interest

Dr. de Langen reports grants from Boehringer, grants from AstraZeneca, non-financial support from Roche, grants and personal fees from Merck / MSD, grants and personal fees from BMS, outside the submitted work.

Dr. Heideman is minority shareholder of Self-screen B.V., a spin-off company of VU University Medical Center (currently known as Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). She has been on the speakers bureau of QIAGEN and serves occasionally on the scientific advisory boards of Pfizer

Acknowledgements

None.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (68)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented in part at WCLC, September 23–26, 2018 in Toronto and ESMO, October 19–23, 2018 in Munich.

View full text