business model design is a key decision for a new firm entrepreneur and a crucial - perhaps more difficult - task for managers charged with rethinking an old model to make their firm fit for the future.
Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective
Introduction
Consider the case of FriCSo, a young engineering company that has achieved a significant technological breakthrough in friction reduction technology.1 Friction is the arch enemy of mechanical systems - it reduces the power of machines, leads to overheating, and causes wear, breakdown and seizure in moving parts. Suppose FriCSo's technological invention can reduce friction by over 15,000%: surely such a staggering technology - with clear and wide applicability to products and industrial applications that involve moving parts (such as machine manufacturing, automobile, shipbuilding, etc.) - will be a sure bet for commercial success? Or will it?
Once a target industry (say, automobile) has been chosen, what kind of company should be built to commercialize the intellectual property? What ‘model’ or ‘template’ should a firm adopt in order to embed itself into the existing ecology of original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and the myriad tier one, two and three industry suppliers? Should it choose to become a machine manufacturer, building machines that embed the new technology, and selling them to the OEMs? Or would it be better to build and operate a factory (a ‘job-shop’) that would perform the surface treatment of moving parts for clients who would outsource that step in their commercial production line to the focal firm's factory? Or would it be better to opt for a pure R&D firm model, and simply sell the technology (e.g., via licensing agreements) to third parties such as machine manufacturers?
Each of these choices involves a fundamentally different business model, that is, implies a different set of activities, as well as the resources and capabilities to perform them - either within the firm, or beyond it through cooperation with partners, suppliers or customers. And each choice will have implications for the venture's performance potential - it will affect what capital expenditures are necessary, what prices can be charged and what margins earned, and, perhaps most importantly, which customers and competitors the new firm will deal with. In other words, the design of the business model is a key decision for an entrepreneur who creates a new firm – and a crucial - perhaps more difficult – task for general managers who are charged with rethinking their old model to make their firm fit for the future. Once the template is set, the activities are in place, and the resources have been developed and honed, that template will be difficult to change, due to forces of inertia and resistance to change.
Given the vital importance of the business model for entrepreneurs and general managers, it is surprising that academic research (with a few exceptions) has so far devoted little attention to this topic. We need a conceptual toolkit that enables entrepreneurial managers to design their future business model, as well as to help managers analyze and improve their current designs to make them fit for the future. This article draws attention to the system of activities performed by the focal firm as well as by third parties (partners, suppliers, customers) as part of the focal firm's business model. We believe that improved knowledge about how to describe the architecture of the activity system, e.g., its key design parameters, will bring the importance of the topic to the forefront of managers' and researchers' thinking, and help them design better business models. In particular, we suggest concepts that are intended to:
- •
give managers and researchers a ‘language,’ concrete tools and a tight framework for business model design that can foster dialogue and promote common understanding;
- •
highlight business model design as a key task of the entrepreneurial manager;
- •
emphasize the importance of system-level design, as opposed to partial optimization (for example, whether a particular activity should be outsourced or conducted in house).
We start by describing the firm's activity system and explain how it captures the essence of its business model, and then support this idea with a brief review of the recent literature on business models. We draw on our own recent work on business models to suggest two sets of parameters that activity systems designers need to consider: design elements (content, structure and governance) that describe an activity system's architecture, and design themes (novelty, lock-in, complementarities and efficiency) that describe the sources of its value creation.2
Section snippets
Activity system: key to understanding the firm's business model
Our previous work notes that the overall objective of a focal firm's business model is to exploit a business opportunity by creating value for the parties involved, i.e., to fulfill customers' needs and create customer surplus while generating a profit for the focal firm and its partners. That objective is reflected in the customer value proposition, and has been characterized by Magretta as ‘the value creating insight on which the firm turns’.3 An activity in a focal firm's business model can
Brief review of the recent literature on business models
The emerging literature on business models suggests that a focus on activities can indeed be useful and unifying.7 In our own work, we have defined the business model as depicting ‘the content, structure, and governance of transactions designed so as to create value through the exploitation of business opportunities’.8 Of course, transactions link activities, and transactions and activities can be viewed as two sides of the same coin.9 For an analogy, consider graph theory with its dual
The design parameters of activity systems
This section describes two sets of design parameters that capture the purposeful, firm-centric design of activity systems – design elements and design themes.
Benefits of an activity system perspective on business models
In this article, we argue that the activity system perspective on business models is consistent with the various approaches that have been advanced in the literature. A business model can be viewed as a template of how a firm conducts business, how it delivers value to stakeholders (e.g., the focal firms, customers, partners, etc.), and how it links factor and product markets. The activity systems perspective addresses all these vital issues, and gives managers and academics a language and a
Acknowledgements
Christoph Zott gratefully acknowledges the research support of IESE. Raphael Amit acknowledges the generous research support of the Robert B. Goergen Chair and the Wharton e-Business initiative. Both authors would like to thank the INSEAD-Wharton Alliance Center for Global Research and Development, which financially supported their research on business models. We also thank Cesar Guzman-Concha for his research assistance for this article. And, finally, our thanks go to Charles Baden-Fuller and
Christoph Zott is a Professor of Entrepreneurship at IESE Business School. His research centers on resource management in entrepreneurial firms; combining resources through business models; the mobilization of resources through entrepreneurs' social influence; the acquisition of private equity; and the deployment of resources through dynamic capabilities. He has published on these topics in top academic journals, as well as in books. He has taught courses on entrepreneurship, strategy, and
References (22)
- et al.
FriCSo (A): How to translate a new technology into a business (model)?; FriCSo (B): Designing the new business model and Fricso (C): Executing The New Business (Model)
(2008) - et al.
Value creation in e-business
Strategic Management Journal
(2001)et al.Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms
Organization Science
(2007)et al.The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance
Strategic Management Journal
(2008) Why business models matter
Harvard Business Review
(2002)et al.Reinventing your business model
Harvard Business Review
(2008)Change in the presence of fit: the rise, fall, and the renaissance of Liz Clairborne
Academy of Management Journal
(2001)Evolution toward fit
Administration Science Quarterly
(2002)- C. Zott and R. Amit, The business model as the engine of network-based strategies, in Paul R. Kleindorfer and Yoram...
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
(1985)What is strategy?
Harvard Business Review
(1996)Toward an entrepreneurial theory of boundaries: the scalability of firms in nascent markets, working paper
(2006)The coming commoditization of processes
Harvard Business Review
(2005)The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market
Journal of Political Economy
(1951)- See also the articles by R. G. McGrath on Business models: A discovery driven approach, Long Range Planning 43(2–3),...
- Amit and Zott, 2001 op. cit. at Ref...
Organizational innovation: the transaction cost approach
- et al.
Internet Business Models and Strategies: Text and Cases, 4
(2000)Business Models: A Strategic Management Approach
(2004)M. W. Johnson et al. (2008), op. cit. at... et al.The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation
Journal of Business Strategy
(2003)Internet Business Models
(2002)et al.The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spinoff companies
Industrial and Corporate Change
(2002)M. E. Porter (1985) op. cit. at...Open Business Models
(2006)
From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development
Organization Science
Shifting innovation to users via toolkits
Management Science
Cited by (1849)
Investigating the entrepreneurial orientation of circular-social hybrid start-ups by assessing their path toward sustainability: Evidence from 20 European cases
2024, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionResearch approaches to sustainable forest-based value creation: A literature review
2024, Forest Policy and EconomicsStakeholder relations as an asset in family firms – Performance effects of changes after PE investment
2024, Scandinavian Journal of ManagementBridging the gap between servitization and social innovation.
2024, Journal of Cleaner ProductionA qualitative inquiry into sustainable transitions and business models in Icelandic energy-related companies
2024, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionSharing economy models and sustainability: Towards a typology
2024, Journal of Cleaner Production
Christoph Zott is a Professor of Entrepreneurship at IESE Business School. His research centers on resource management in entrepreneurial firms; combining resources through business models; the mobilization of resources through entrepreneurs' social influence; the acquisition of private equity; and the deployment of resources through dynamic capabilities. He has published on these topics in top academic journals, as well as in books. He has taught courses on entrepreneurship, strategy, and private equity at IESE, INSEAD, and the University of British Columbia. IESE Business School, Av. Pearson 21, 08034 Barcelona (Spain); Tel: +34 93 602 4096; Fax: +34 93 253 4343; E-mail: [email protected].
Raphael (“Raffi”) Amit is the Robert B. Goergen Professor of Entrepreneurship and a Professor of Management at the Wharton School, and also Academic Director of the Goergen Entrepreneurial Management Programs which encompasses all Wharton's entrepreneurial programs. He holds B.A. and M.A. degrees in Economics, and received his Ph.D. in Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences from Northwestern University's J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management. Dr. Amit's current research and teaching interests center on the design of business models, on family business management, governance and finance, and on venture capital and private equity investments. He has published extensively in leading academic journals and is frequently quoted in a broad range of practitioner outlets. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6370 (USA); Tel: (215) 898-7731; Fax: (215) 573-7189 E-mail: [email protected]