Elsevier

Lingua

Volume 120, Issue 3, March 2010, Pages 693-716
Lingua

Unaccusative transitives and the Person-Case Constraint effects in Kurdish

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to unravel the intricacies brought about by the eccentric pattern of agreement in Kurdish unaccusative transitive constructions.1 We will propose that there is a strict correlation between Agree in syntax (Chomsky, 2000, Chomsky, 2001) and Agreement in morphology (Bobaljik, 2008) to the effect that the φ-features shared by the controller and the target of Agreement in PF must match the corresponding φ-features shared via Agree in narrow syntax. We will specifically argue that the φ-feature mismatch at the syntax–morphology interface is responsible for the emergence of the Person-Case Constraint (PCC) effects. Viewing the PCC from this perspective provides adequate grounds to account for the default agreement and focus movement as ways of circumventing the PCC in Kurdish. At an explanatory level this work presents corroborative evidence to conceive of the PCC as an epiphenomenon ensuing from the interplay of the more general principles at the syntax–morphology interface.

References (43)

  • A. Holmberg et al.

    Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions

    Lingua

    (2003)
  • D. Adger et al.

    Syntax and syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint

    Syntax

    (2007)
  • Albizu, P., 1997. Generalized Person-Case Constraint: a case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology. In:...
  • E. Anagnostopoulou

    The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics

    (2003)
  • P. Anand et al.

    The locus of ergative case assignment: evidence from scope

  • S. Bejar et al.

    Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects

  • R. Bhatt

    Long distance agreement in Hindi–Urdu

    Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

    (2006)
  • J. Bobaljik

    Where's Phi? agreement as a post-syntactic operation

  • C. Boeckx

    Quirky agreement

    Studia Linguistica

    (2000)
  • Bonet, E., 1991. Morphology after syntax: pronominal clitics in Romance. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT,...
  • Bonet, E., 1994. The Person-Case Constraint: a morphological approach. In: Harley, H., Philips, C. (Eds.), The...
  • T. Bynon

    The ergative construction in Kurdish

    Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies

    (1979)
  • N. Chomsky

    The Minimalist Program

    (1995)
  • N. Chomsky

    Minimalist inquiries: the framework

  • N. Chomsky

    Derivation by phase

  • N. Chomsky

    On phases

  • Chomsky, N., 2007. Approaching UG from below. Ms,...
  • G. Cinque

    Types of A′-Dependencies

    (1990)
  • D’Alessandro, R., 2004. Impersonal si constructions: agreement and interpretation. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of...
  • C. De Cat

    French subject clitics are not agreement markers

    Lingua

    (2005)
  • D. Embick et al.

    Movement operations after syntax

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (2001)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Possessor raising and the structure of impersonal complex predicates in Persian

      2013, Lingua
      Citation Excerpt :

      The cliticization pattern in Persian follows from a lowering rule, similar to the cliticization algorithm Karimi (2010a) has proposed for Kurdish.11 Building on the leading ideas developed in Embick and Noyer (2001), Karimi (2010a) proposes that the cliticization rule targets the highest (defined in terms of c-command) overt [+N] constituent in vP. The same proposal can be extended to the Persian Impersonal CPrs to the effect that the cliticization follows from a lowering process at PF (subsequent to all syntactic computations).

    • Introduction

      2023, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory
    • On Iranian case and agreement

      2020, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    The Kurdish dialect under discussion is called ‘Sorani’ which is spoken in the Kurdish areas across the border of Iran and Iraq limited to Kurdistan and Azarbaijan-e Gharbi provinces in Iran and Suleymania and Erbil provinces in Iraq.

    View full text