Rural Residential Land Transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region: Spatial-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications
Introduction
The coordinated development of urban and rural areas is a current focus of social attention and a pressing development conundrum (Liu et al., 2013). At present, the urban-rural relationship in the world's major developed countries has gradually evolved from a single mode of interaction to a deep integration of urban and rural areas, forming a correlation–mutualism relationship between urban and rural areas based on free flow and mutually beneficial networks (Christer, 2004; Adamson et al., 2004; Taylor and Aranya, 2008). Urban and rural policies in developing countries tend to be targeted towards urban or rural areas in different stages (Berdegué et al., 2015). Over the past 40 years, China, the world’s largest developing country and home to a large rural population, has experienced a rapid transformation from a planned to a market economy as a result of economic reform and opening up. Urbanisation has developed at an unprecedented speed (Bai et al., 2014; Liu and Yang, 2015), and agriculture and rural areas have made great contributions to the development of industry and cities (Long et al., 2011). The collision of internal development factors and the traction of external demand have greatly changed the human–land relationship and regional functions in rural China (Liu and Li, 2017; Liu, 2018a). As large numbers of rural inhabitants migrated to urban areas, triggering non-agricultural population transfer and multiple job-holding. And in the absence of rural construction planning and strict land management systems, the ‘hollow village’ has become a widespread reality, where one family owns more than one house, including a newly built house while the old one remains undemolished (Li et al., 2018b). This has created a spatial pattern of outer expansion and inner decay, and resulted in disorderly expansion (Liu et al., 2014). In this context, ‘hollow villages’ in rural areas in China reflect a trend of accelerating development, which stands in contrast to the decreasing rural population and increase in the amount of rural land under construction. This creates huge obstacles to improving land use efficiency and coordinating urban and rural development (Long et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2018). On the one hand, stagnant village development is threatening the sustainability and resilience of village, and leading to village decline, including a series of ‘rural diseases’ (Liu, 2018a). On the other hand, it has already had serious negative impacts on the protection of cultivated land resources, adherence to ecological red lines, urban–rural coordination, and sustainable development.
Overall, China has entered a transition period of eliminating urban-rural dual structure and integrating urban–rural socioeconomic development (Liu et al., 2014). The report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that it is necessary to implement a rural vitalisation strategy, prioritise the development of agriculture and rural land, and focus on using land more economically and intensively. At present, 10%–15% of China’s rural residential land is idle (Yun, 2014), and the per capita living area of the rural population is 317 square meters (m2) on average, 2.68 times the per capita construction land area of urban residents (Zhou et al., 2019). It is expected that the rural population in China will continue to move to the cities. As a huge potential for future development, how to properly deal with the potential problems needs to be thoroughly analysed on the current problems of rural land use in China. It is particularly important to determine how to accelerate the rational transition of rural land, optimise the spatial layout of urban and rural land use, and promote the development of rural vitalisation.
Land use transition, as a new approach to the comprehensive study of land-use and land-cover change (LUCC), emphasises changes in regional land use patterns corresponding to the current stage of economic and social development (Long et al., 2018). At present, land use transition research has expanded to cultivated land, urban construction land, rural residential land, rural enterprise land, and other, special areas such as poverty–stricken areas (Xiang et al., 2016) and mountainous areas (Zhang et al., 2018). Rural residential land transition (RRLT) is the core performance of rural human–land relationship (Qiao et al., 2015). Rural residential land generally refers to land occupied by townships and villages without the administrative status of a town, and includes land used by farmers for the construction of houses and other living facilities (Ma et al., 2018). These areas are core gathering places and sites for the social and economic activities of rural collectives and their members. Rural residential land serves as a special geographical space generated by multi-scale and multi-element interactions in rural regional systems. In the process of rural land use transition, changes in the use of rural residential land play a leading role (Long and Li, 2012).
Research on RRLT mainly focuses on the rule of dynamic evolution (Roberts, 1996), quantity change (Johnson and Maxwell, 2001; Marlow and Krupa, 2002), utilisation intensity (Robinson, 2003), driving mechanism (Carrion-Flores and Irwin, 2004), and landscape morphology (Tian et al., 2012), and belongs to the early field of land-use and land-cover change. Given the transformation of social and economic development and the sharp adjustment of rural structures, RRLT research is gradually shifting its focus to the direction and mode of transition (Sevenant and Antrop, 2007; Chen and Xie, 2016), hierarchical structure (Du, 2017), transformations in housing construction (Banski and Wesolowska, 2010), evolutionary simulation (Gong and Yang, 2015), and the coupling relationship with cultivated land (Qu et al., 2019). The measurement of RRLT is mainly based on remote sensing image data, socioeconomic statistics, and field survey data. The main methods used include the landscape pattern index, spatial correlation analysis, gravity model, and complex network model.
Overall, research on rural residential land has gradually shifted its focus from natural attributes such as spatial morphology to economic and social attributes. The content of the research has changed from the physical entity of residential land to the comprehensive study of human living environments and social problems. The methodology tends to be empirical, paying more attention to the combination of theory and evidence, focusing on the use of remote sensing, geographic information systems, and other means to obtain and process data, and then turning to multidisciplinary research. However, instruments for quantifying and localising settlement dynamics and expansion strategies are still missing (Conrad et al., 2015). Existing research on RRLT mostly focuses on the characteristics of a certain aspect of transition, and the dimensions are relatively simple. Long-term, cross-regional, multidimensional, and multi-level system linkage analysis is relatively lacking. Thus, it necessary to strengthen the analysis of differentiated characteristics of RRLT and summarise the laws of transition.
The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei(BTH)region, as one of China’s three major economic growth poles, promoting the coordinated development of the region in an all-round way is an important strategy at the national level. However, the lack of a coordinated industrial system between population and land in the region, along with the migration of a large portion of the rural population to cities to work (settling largely around Beijing, Tianjin, and Shijiazhuang) has resulted in the weakening of rural enterprises, rural hollowing, environmental pollution, and other serious problems, which are restricting the sustainable development of the region (Yang et al., 2018). Given the BTH region’s important strategic position with regard to national development and non-homogeneous development space, it is important to depict the transition characteristics and spatial–temporal distribution rules of rural residential land. This study aims to (a) construct a conceptual model of the multidimensional transition of rural residential land and elaborate specific measurement methods, (b) analyse the spatial differentiation characteristics and regularity of the multidimensional transition of rural residential land in the BTH region over the past 40 years, and (c) propose targeted strategies for rural residential land according to the characteristics of different functional areas and unbalanced development in the region, while promoting sustainable urban and rural spatial structures. Compared with existing research, this study attempts to construct a more comprehensive research route for the transition of rural residential land use, and to identify the characteristics of spatial differentiation and regularity of RRLT in different stages of economic development through a longitudinal analysis of long-term sequences. The results deepen the theoretical connotations and measurement methods of land use transition, and provide a scientific basis to guide regional rural development planning and land policy formulation in practice, so as to realise rural revitalisation and regional coordinated development.
Section snippets
Conceptual framework
The human–land system is a large, open, complex system comprising two subsystems: the geographical environment and human society (Wu, 2008). The combination of material circulation and energy conversion between these two subsystems forms a mechanism for the development and change of human–land systems (Wu, 1991). The main visible forms of these processes resulting from the above are land use structure and changes relating to the plane effect. Regarding the stereoscopic effect, the main response
Study area
The BTH region is China’s ‘capital economic circle’, and includes Beijing, Tianjin, Baoding, Tangshan, Langfang, Qinhuangdao, Zhangjiakou, Chengde, Shijiazhuang, Cangzhou, Handan, Xingtai, and Hengshui in Hebei Province. The terrain extends from high in the northwest to low in the southeast, showing a typical semi-annular stepped landform. The total area is 218,000 square kilometres (km2). It is China’s economic, international exchange, cultural, and innovation centre (Fig. 2). From 1985 to
Results
In 2018, rural residential land accounted for 51% of the total construction land area in the BTH region; the share of rural residential area to construction land is 32% in Beijing, 30% in Tianjin, and 58% in Hebei. From the landscape characteristics of rural residential land in the BTH region in 2018, the MPS, LSI, and AI all indicate that Tianjin > Beijing > Hebei, revealing that, compared with Beijing and Hebei, the landscape morphology of rural residential areas in Tianjin involves a
Discussion
Influenced by the development of urban–rural integration and various land use policies, land use in rural residential areas is undergoing profound changes. A comprehensive understanding of the law of RRLT and an analysis of its operational mechanism and effect mechanisms are the scientific bases for the orderly promotion of integrated urban–rural land use and the development of rural transformation. By constructing the conceptual framework of RRLT, this study further analysed the
Conclusions
In the nearly 40 years from 1980 to 2018, the BTH region has been impacted by the original driving force of rural population growth followed by the rapid development of the regional economy, farmers’ economic strength has strengthened and new houses have been built. As urbanisation continues to advance, the government has strengthened the management and regulation of land, and the transition extent of rural residential land has undergone the process of ‘slow growth—expanding start—fast
Author statement
We certify that we have participated sufficiently in the work and the written paper is entirely original. The underlying data are represented accurately in the paper, and the data or work not belong to this paper has been appropriately cited or quoted as the references. And we also ensure that we don’t publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication, and we don’t submit a previously published paper in another journal. Any obtained
Declaration of Competing Interest
All the authors declare no competing financial interests.
Acknowledgements
The paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71874196) and the Achievements of the Top Innovative Talents Cultivation Subsidy Program of Renmin University of China in 2017. Thanks to all anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
References (64)
- et al.
Transformations in housing construction in rural areas of Poland’s Lublin region—Influence on the spatial settlement structure and landscape aesthetics
Landsc. Urban Plan.
(2010) - et al.
Cities, Territories, and Inclusive Growth: Unraveling Urban–rural Linkages in Chile, Colombia, and Mexico
World Development
(2015) - et al.
The impact of rural out-migration on land use transition in China: Past, present and trend
Land Use Policy.
(2014) - et al.
Measuring the symbiotic development of rural housing and industry: A case study of Fuping County in the Taihang Mountains in China
Land Use Policy
(2019) - et al.
Measuring rural settlement expansion in Uzbekistan using remote sensing to support spatial planning
Appl. Geogr.
(2015) - et al.
The role of the conservation reserve program in controlling rural residential development
J. Rural Stud.
(2001) - et al.
Land consolidation for rural sustainability in China: Practical reflections and policy implications
Land Use Policy.
(2018) - et al.
Community-based rural residential land consolidation and allocation can help to revitalize hollowed villages in traditional agricultural areas of China: Evidence from Dancheng County, Henan Province
Land Use Policy.
(2014) Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China
Land Use Policy.
(2018)- et al.
Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making
Land Use Policy.
(2014)
Conversion from rural settlements and arable land under rapid urbanization in Beijing during 1985–2010
J. Rural Stud.
Strategic adjustment of land use policy under the economic transformation
Land Use Policy.
Spatial-temporal change of urban–rural equalized development patterns in China and its driving factors
J. Rural Stud.
Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by ‘increasing vs. decreasing balance’ land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages
Land Use Policy.
Spatio-temporal dynamic patterns of farmland and rural settlements in Su–Xi–Chang region: Implications for building a new countryside in coastal China
Land Use Policy.
Analysis of rural transformation development in China since the turn of the new millennium
Appl. Geogr.
Understanding rural land use transition and regional consolidation implications in China
Land Use Policy.
Settlement models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes: Two case studies in Greece
Landsc. Urban Plan.
Assessment of decoupling between rural settlement area and rural population in China
Land Use Policy.
The investigation of relationship between rural settlement density, size, spatial distribution and its geophysical parameters of China using Landsat TM images
Ecol. Model.
Measure of urban-rural transformation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in the new millennium: Population-land-industry perspective
Land Use Policy
Land consolidation boosting poverty alleviation in China: Theory and practice
Land Use Policy.
Functional transition of the rural settlement: Analysis of land-use differentiation in a transect of Beijing
China. Habitat Int.
Do Urban Agglomeration Effects and Household Amenities Have a Skill Bias?
Journal of Regional Science.
Realizing China’s urban dream
Nature.
A correlation analysis on landscape metrics
Acta Geogr. Sin
Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe
Am. J. Agr. Econ.
The spatial evolution and restructuring of rural settlements in Jiangnan hilly region: A case study in South Jiangxi
Geogr. Res.
Urban–rural Relations in Europe
Collections of Inter–regional Conference on Strategies for Enhancing Rural–urban Linkages Approach to Development and Promotion of Local Economic Development
Research of urban–rural residential land transition in Youyi County
China Land Sci.
The human geography view of land use study and new proposition
Prog. Geog.
Evolution characteristics and its driving force of rural residential land at village level during 1980–2012
Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng.
Cited by (43)
Regional proximity effects of landscape pattern evolution: Evidence from 325 county-level areas in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, China
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentEvolution of farmland landscape fragmentation and its driving factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
2023, Journal of Cleaner ProductionIdentification and driving mechanism of the industrial land use transition in China
2023, Habitat International