Elsevier

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volume 187, July 2019, Pages 181-190
Landscape and Urban Planning

Research Paper
The urban matrix matters: Quantifying the effects of surrounding urban vegetation on natural habitat remnants in Santiago de Chile

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.027Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The study examines how urban natural remnants (UNRs) are affected by surrounding vegetation.

  • The NDVI of UNRs responds to surrounding vegetation composition but not configuration.

  • Effects of urban vegetation on UNR’s NDVI increase in time but decrease with distance from edge.

  • Managing and planning UNRs should explicitly consider matrix vegetation pattern across scales.

Abstract

Urbanization destroys and fragments natural habitats, resulting in a system of natural remnants embedded in an urban matrix. Urban natural remnants (UNRs) can provide multiple ecosystem services for urban areas. Nevertheless, the long-term provision of ecosystem services by UNRs depends on their capacity to retain the ecosystem processes supporting the services. As vegetation from the urban matrix could play a key role in remnants ecological dynamics, understanding the effect of surrounding urban vegetation on UNRs ecosystem processes is fundamental for sustainable urban planning. In this work, we used a multi-temporal and -spatial scale approach to evaluate the role that vegetation patterns (i.e. composition and configuration) of the urban matrix have played on ecosystem processes (i.e. primary productivity) of 10 UNRs located in the city of Santiago (Chile). Using a set of six remote sensing-derived vegetation indices (years 1985–2010), we analyzed how temporal changes in primary productivity of UNRs were related to changes in vegetation patterns of the surrounding urban matrix, and assessed the potential role of the matrix’s socioeconomic level on these results. Our results show that productivity decreased in all UNRs and that this productivity loss was spatially correlated with the changes in vegetation cover of the surrounding urban matrix. UNR productivity was more strongly correlated with matrix composition than matrix configuration. Correlation strength between matrix composition and UNR productivity increased in time and decreased with distance from the edge of UNRs inward, suggesting that the effects of matrix vegetation on the ecological processes within UNRs are both time- and location-dependent. The socioeconomic level of the matrix showed a positive association with the vegetation cover of the matrix, but did not have a statistically significant correlation with UNR primary productivity. Results from our work demonstrate that the changes in urban matrix vegetation induced by urbanization may have strong impacts on the ecological processes that underpin the provision of ecosystem services by UNRs. If planners ought to increase the provision of ecosystem services by these UNRs, the strategies should not only focus on managing vegetation within UNRs, but also on properly planning vegetation in the surrounding urban matrix.

Introduction

Urbanization is among the most drastic human-driven land-use change processes (Foley et al., 2005, Seto et al., 2011, Sushinsky et al., 2013). Urbanization usually results in the loss, degradation and fragmentation of natural habitats; reduction of native biodiversity and increase of invasive species; loss of agriculture lands; pollution of streams, air and soils; and modification of energy flows and nutrient cycles (Alberti, 2005, Grimm et al., 2008, McKinney, 2008). These modifications have long-lasting effects on the structure and functioning of ecosystems. Once urbanization takes place, chances to restore urbanized lands to a previous natural stage are severely limited (Lindig-Cisneros and Zedler, 2000, Pavao-Zuckerman, 2008, Standish et al., 2013).

Urbanization is a dynamic process, often combining periods of slower inner densification and rapid outward expansion (Antrop, 2004, Dietzel et al., 2005). As urban areas expand, protected and non-urbanizable areas outside urban boundaries become progressively fragmented, often leading to a system of scattered natural remnants embedded in an heterogeneous urban matrix (Ramalho & Hobbs, 2012). Here we refer to these remnants as Urban Natural Remnants (UNRs), defining them as “natural areas that have been partially or completely isolated by an urban matrix, but that still retain compositional and structural characteristics of the original natural habitat”.

UNRs can provide multiple ecosystem services (ES) for urban areas, and different cities have promoted their conservation by including them as part of the urban green spaces system; e.g. San Diego-California Ravines (Soule, 1991), Phoenix-Arizona Mountain Preserves (Esbah, Cook, & Ewan, 2009), Santiago-Chile Island Hills (Forray et al., 2012). Depending on their size and ecological features, ES provided by UNRs may include carbon sequestration, oxygen provision, air pollution reduction, microclimate regulation, water infiltration, recreational and educational opportunities, increased city attractiveness, and provision of habitat for biodiversity (La Rosa and Privitera, 2013, Lovell and Taylor, 2013, Silva de Araújo and Bernard, 2016). Nevertheless, the provision of ES by UNRs cannot be taken for granted, as this will depend on the capacity of UNRs to retain the underlying ecosystem processes supporting the delivery of services (de Groot et al., 2002, de Groot et al., 2010), which can be severely affected by the urbanization process.

Ecosystem processes within UNRs could be affected by urbanization via two main pathways: abiotic and biotic effects. Abiotic conditions in urban areas often differ from those in natural and rural areas. Thus, as urban areas expand, UNRs become exposed to a urban matrix with different abiotic conditions, such as higher average temperatures, lower wind speeds, higher levels of air particulate matter, higher atmospheric concentration of inorganic and organic pollutants, and accumulation of these compounds and heavy metals in soils (Grimm et al., 2008, Pickett et al., 2011). Urbanization also modifies the species composition within UNRs as they become increasingly isolated by a contrasting urban matrix (Fernández and Simonetti, 2013, Gibb and Hochuli, 2002, Jellinek et al., 2004, Soulé et al., 1992). This change in species composition is coupled with modification of trophic interactions (Crooks and Soulé, 1999, Faeth et al., 2005), which together with the modification of abiotic conditions, may radically alter key ecosystem processes within UNRs, therefore threatening the capacity of UNRs to provide ES.

However, there is ample evidence that the composition and structure of the surrounding matrix play a key role mediating the biotic and abiotic effects of fragmentation on remaining natural habitats outside urban areas (Ricketts, 2001, Murphy and Lovett-Doust, 2004, Prevedello and Vieira, 2010, Watling et al., 2011, Ruffell et al., 2017). Therefore, similar mediating effects may be assumed for UNRs. In fact, previous studies have shown that less intensive land-use types and higher vegetation cover in the surrounding urban matrix are positively associated with richness of native birds species in UNRs of Stockholm, Seattle and Phoenix (Donnelly and Marzluff, 2006, Litteral and Wu, 2012, Mörtberg, 2001). Nevertheless, while the effects of the urban matrix on UNRs biodiversity have been increasingly covered, there is still a gap of knowledge regarding the effect of the urban matrix on UNRs ecosystem processes. This lack of knowledge not only limits our ecological understanding of the effects of urbanization on UNRs ecology, but may also be reducing our capacity for planning and managing the surrounding urban matrix of UNRs to promote the long-term delivery of ES by these remnants.

Particularly relevant from an urban planning perspective is to evaluate if vegetation in the urban matrix play a role enhancing or mitigating the effects of urbanization on UNRs ecosystem process. While there is ample knowledge on the fundamental role that urban vegetation plays for directly providing ES in urban areas (Gómez-Baggethun and Barton, 2013, Lovell and Taylor, 2013, Niemelä et al., 2010), studies analyzing an additional role of urban vegetation for supporting the provision of ES by UNRs seems to be missing. This information could be particularly relevant for cities with limited resources for managing UNRs and where increasing urban vegetation in residential areas is highly needed. Because if well planned, urban vegetation could provide ES at the local scale, and at the same time support the long-term provision of ES by UNRs at larger scales.

Understanding the effects of urban matrix vegetation on UNRs ecosystem processes is a challenging task. The urban matrix is highly heterogeneous in space and time, and therefore approaches that treats the matrix as a rather static homogenous element, such as those based in landscape fragmentation theories (Ewers and Didham, 2006, Fahrig, 2003), may fail to identify relevant spatio-temporal patterns affecting ecosystem processes within remnants (Ramalho and Hobbs, 2012, Ramalho et al., 2014). Furthermore, humans play a key role modifying vegetation patterns in urban areas (Faeth, Bang, & Saari, 2011), therefore their potential role on the observed temporal patterns of vegetation and UNRs ecosystem processes needs to be included in the analysis. In this regard, an urban landscape ecological approach may be particularly helpful for understanding and addressing these types of challenges. This approach emphasizes the interrelation between landscape patterns and ecological processes operating at multiple temporal and spatial scales, and encourages place-based research that integrates ecology with urban design and planning (Wu, He, Huang, & Yu, 2013).

In this work, we used a multi temporal and spatial scale approach to evaluate the potential role of vegetation spatial patterns of the urban matrix on the primary productivity of 10 UNRs located in the city of Santiago de Chile. Using a set of 6 remote sensing-derived vegetation indices data (years 1985–2010), we analyzed how the temporal changes in primary productivity within UNRs relates to changes of vegetation patterns of the surrounding urban matrix at different temporal and spatial scales. Because in Santiago urban matrix vegetation cover is strongly positively associated with neighborhoods socioeconomic level (de la Barrera et al., 2016, Fernández and Wu, 2016), we also evaluated if UNRs productivity trends could be explained by the diverse socioeconomic levels of neighborhoods surrounding the assessed UNRs. We aimed to answer the following questions: (1) Is primary productivity of UNRs affected by the amount and spatial pattern of vegetation cover in the urban matrix? (2) At what temporal and spatial scales do these effects take place? (3) What ecological and socioeconomic factors may be driving these effects at different scales?

Section snippets

Study area

The city of Santiago is located in the Maipo River Basin of Central Chile (33°26′15″S; 70°39′01″W), bounded on the east by the Andes Mountain and on the west by the Coastal Mountain Range (Fig. 1), covering a total built-up area of near 600 km2 (Banzhaf, Reyes-Paecke, Müller, & Kindler, 2013). Climate is Mediterranean, with a marked cold and rainy winter, and a dry and hot summer season. Original vegetation is represented mostly by summer drought tolerant species, which can form dense or sparse

Spatial association between UNRs ΔNDVI and matrix vegetation ΔSAVI

Pearson correlation analysis shows that UNRs ΔNDVI and matrix vegetation ΔSAVI tend to be spatially positively correlated for all assessed periods (i.e. years elapsed since the baseline year), except for the shortest period (Fig. 4). These associations become stronger in time, and weaker as distance from UNRs edge increases (i.e. increasing buffer size). Although most correlation values are not statistically significant (p < 0.05), the spatial and temporal trends are consistent, showing peak

Discussion

This is the first study aimed to analyze how the rapid urbanization process of Santiago have affected the temporal trends of primary productivity of Santiago’s UNRs, and particularly aimed to assess the role of urban matrix vegetation patterns on enhancing or mitigating the effects of urbanization on these UNRs. If well managed, UNRs can provide several ES to urban areas (Ramalho and Hobbs, 2012, Standish et al., 2013). Therefore, efforts to understand the potential role of vegetation at UNRs

Conclusions

Increasing the provision of ES within urban areas is crucial for developing more resilient and sustainable cities (Jansson, 2013, McPhearson et al., 2015, Wu, 2014). Nevertheless, while there is ample knowledge of the direct role of urban vegetation in providing urban ES (Gómez-Baggethun and Barton, 2013, Lovell and Taylor, 2013, Niemelä et al., 2010), there is scarce evidence on the additional role that urban vegetation may play in sustaining the provision of ES by UNRs. Most urban ecological

References (84)

  • H. Gibb et al.

    Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: Large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages

    Biological Conservation

    (2002)
  • E. Gómez-Baggethun et al.

    Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning

    Ecological Economics

    (2013)
  • Å. Jansson

    Reaching for a sustainable, resilient urban future using the lens of ecosystem services

    Ecological Economics

    (2013)
  • D. La Rosa et al.

    Characterization of non-urbanized areas for land-use planning of agricultural and green infrastructure in urban contexts

    Landscape and Urban Planning

    (2013)
  • T. McPhearson et al.

    Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services

    Ecosystem Services

    (2015)
  • R.C.G. Mesquita et al.

    Effect of surrounding vegetation on edge-related tree mortality in Amazonian forest fragments

    Biological Conservation

    (1999)
  • S.T.A. Pickett et al.

    Urban ecological systems: Scientific foundations and a decade of progress

    Journal of Environmental Management

    (2011)
  • C.E. Ramalho et al.

    Time for a change: Dynamic urban ecology

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution

    (2012)
  • H. Romero et al.

    Assessing urban environmental segregation (UES). The case of Santiago de Chile

    Ecological Indicators

    (2012)
  • J. Wu

    Urban ecology and sustainability: The state-of-the-science and future directions

    Landscape and Urban Planning

    (2014)
  • M. Alberti

    The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function

    International Regional Science Review

    (2005)
  • J. Armesto et al.

    Relations between vegetation structure and slope aspect in the mediterranean region of Chile

    Journal of Ecology

    (1978)
  • A. Bannari et al.

    Spatial distribution mapping of vegetation cover in urban environment using TDVI for quality of life monitoring

  • P.I. Becerra et al.

    Importance of irrigation and plant size in the establishment success of different native species in a degraded ecosystem of central Chile

    Bosque (Valdivia)

    (2013)
  • P.I. Becerra et al.

    Spatio-temporal variation in the effect of herbaceous layer on woody seedling survival in a Chilean mediterranean ecosystem

    Journal of Vegetation Science

    (2011)
  • J.P. Boisier et al.

    Anthropogenic and natural contributions to the Southeast Pacific precipitation decline and recent megadrought in central Chile

    Geophysical Research Letters

    (2016)
  • K. Crooks et al.

    Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system

    Nature

    (1999)
  • de la Barrera, F., & Henríquez, C. (2016). “Labeling” the context to stimulate smart decisions : Quantification and...
  • I.A. Díaz et al.

    La conservación de las aves silvestres en ambientes urbanos de Santiago

    Revista Ambiente Y Desarrollo

    (2003)
  • C. Dietzel et al.

    Spatio-temporal dynamics in California’s Central Valley: Empirical links to urban theory

    International Journal of Geographical Information Science

    (2005)
  • R. Donnelly et al.

    Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments

    Urban Ecosystems

    (2006)
  • H. Esbah et al.

    Effects of increasing urbanization on the ecological integrity of open space preserves

    Environmental Management

    (2009)
  • R.M. Ewers et al.

    Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation

    Biological Reviews

    (2006)
  • S.H. Faeth et al.

    Urban biodiversity: Patterns and mechanisms

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (2011)
  • S.H. Faeth et al.

    Trophic dynamics in urban communities

    BioScience

    (2005)
  • L. Fahrig

    Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity

    Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

    (2003)
  • I.C. Fernández

    Los Cerros Isla como hábitats de fauna y generadores de servicios ambientales para la ciudad de Santiago de Chile

    Revista Conservación Ambiental

    (2011)
  • I.C. Fernández

    Planning for Urban Ecosystem Services: Generating Actionable Knowledge for Reducing Environmental Inequities in Santiago de Chile

    (2017)
  • I.C. Fernández et al.

    Breaking resilient patterns of inequality in Santiago de Chile: Challenges to navigate towards a more sustainable city

    Sustainability

    (2016)
  • I.C. Fernández et al.

    Small mammal assemblages in fragmented shrublands of urban areas of Central Chile

    Urban Ecosystems

    (2013)
  • J.A. Foley et al.

    Global consequences of land use

    Science

    (2005)
  • R. Forray et al.

    Integración de los cerros isla al sistema de áreas verdes de Santiago 2011

  • Cited by (22)

    • Patch three-dimensional effect for plant species diversity of urban remnant mountain in multi-mountain city

      2022, Ecological Indicators
      Citation Excerpt :

      With accelerated urbanization and a dramatic increase in urban population, many cities are experiencing large-scale land use changes (Hahs et al., 2009; Chang et al., 2017; Fernandez et al., 2019).

    • Urbanization strengthens the edge effects on species diversity and composition of woody plants in remnant forests

      2022, Forest Ecosystems
      Citation Excerpt :

      Urban remnant forests are not only directly damaged by urban expansion (e.g., loss of area) (Salghuna et al., 2018) but also indirectly affected by urban environments (e.g., changes in the conditions of habitats) (Huang et al., 2012). Remnant forest patches and the surrounding urban landscapes can be seen as typical patch-matrix frameworks (Fernández et al., 2018). The environmental conditions of the habitats located at the edge of remnant patches can be altered by a surrounding urban matrix.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text