Elsevier

Journal of Water Process Engineering

Volume 4, December 2014, Pages 212-223
Journal of Water Process Engineering

Review
A review on the recovery methods of draw solutes in forward osmosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.10.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Recently, there has been an increasing use of forward osmosis (FO) technique for energy-efficient water treatment, leading to significant public concerns. One key know-how to make FO practical is developing an ideal draw solute characterized by high water flux, low reverse solute flux, and easy recovery. The recovery of draw solutes takes a significant energy cost in FO technology implementation. To this end, it is necessary to enhance the understanding of how different kinds of draw solutes are regenerated during the dewatering process. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge of draw solutes in terms of recovery from water. A variety of existing recovery methods developed so far to overcome the recovery barriers, including thermal separation, membrane separation, precipitation, stimuli–response, combined processes, and direct use without recovery are presented. Discussions on the advantages and limits of the existing recovery methods are made based on acquired knowledge from the literature. Future directions for the effective and energy-efficient recovery of draw solutes are also provided. Information summarized in the paper further highlights the potential applications of the FO process.

Introduction

Since the beginning of the 2000s, forward osmosis (FO) has gained increasing popularity. It has been viewed as one of the most promising technologies in the 21st century [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], as it is a green membrane technology for desalination and water treatment with advantages of lower energy cost and less membrane fouling compared with traditional membrane processes such as reverse osmosis (RO), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and microfiltration (MF) [4], [7], [8], [9], [10]. In a FO process, a draw solution is used to “attract” water from feed solution by osmotic pressure difference through a semi-permeable membrane, while most solutes are rejected by the FO membrane. This is followed by a process to reconcentrate the diluted draw solution and produce clean water. Although not all FO applications require recovery of draw solutes (DSs) (e.g., for nutritious drinks during emergencies [11], irrigation [12], and desert restoration [13]), several major FO applications (e.g., desalination for drinking water, wastewater reclamation, etc.) need DSs to be separated from water or reconcentrated for reuse [14], [15]. The selection and use of a suitable draw solute can greatly influence the efficiency and sustainability of FO operations. Typically, an ideal draw solute in FO for water production should have the desired properties of high osmotic pressure, minimal reverse solute diffusion, easy separation from water, economic feasibility, reusability, nontoxicity, and compatibility with FO membranes [16], [17], [18], [19].

In recent years, a number of novel DSs have been proposed together with a variety of remarkable recovery technologies besides traditional DSs like sodium chloride (NaCl) [20] to advance FO technology for various applications (Table 1). These DSs may be generally classified into inorganic salts, and organic compounds according to their physicochemical properties. The inorganic salts including ammonia–carbon dioxide (CO2/NH3) [21], fertilizers [12], seawater [22], [23], and aluminum/copper/magnesium sulfate [24], [25], [26], have been proposed to reduce the energy cost for regeneration. However, the inorganic DSs with monovalent ions may cause high reverse solute flux. The organic compounds include 2-methylimidazole-based compounds [27], polyacrylic acid sodium salts (PSA) [28], hexavalent phosphazene salts [29], switchable polarity solvents (SPS) [30], hydroacid complexes [31], EDTA sodium salts [32], sodium lignin sulfonate (NaLS) [13], zwitterions [33], Na+-functionalized carbon quantum dots (Na-CQD) [34], and smart materials [18], which are expected to have minimal reverse solute flux and require low energy cost for recovery. Among the organic DSs, smart materials with intelligent response have attracted growing interest for FO applications recently, including functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], thermosensitive polyelectrolytes [43], [44], [45], [46], and stimuli-responsive hydrogels responding to different stimuli such as heating [10], [47], a combination of heating and hydraulic pressure [48], sunlight [49], [50], [51], gas pressure [52], and magnetic heating [53]. These smart DSs may be recovered at a relatively low-energy cost under different stimuli, and induce minimal reverse solute flux due to their large sizes. However, a comprehensive review of the recovery methods of these DSs is not available. Thus the objectives of this paper are (1) to conduct a critical and detailed review on the existing recovery methods of DSs, and (2) to illustrate how the newly developed technical innovations on recovery of DSs have led to preference for FO technology as a membrane-based separation process.

Section snippets

Thermal separation

In as early as the 1960s, a variety of reagents were tested for use as DSs in the FO process for seawater desalination. However, previous efforts on these reagents are mostly presented for patents; thus, they have limited technical and performance details. In 1965, Batchelder used volatile solutes such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) in FO [54]. SO2 was added to seawater or freshwater to create a solution with high osmotic pressure, which could be used as the driving force to extract water from

Challenges and prospects for the future

A number of recovery methods based on the types of DSs in FO processes have been summarized and highlighted including thermal separation, membrane separation, precipitation, stimuli–response, combined processes, and direct use without recovery. All of them have demonstrated their potential in FO processes for various applications. However, they are still facing many challenges related to being energy-efficient and environmental-friendly, high water recovery rates, high water quality, easy

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 51308239) and Huazhong University of Science and Technology for the financial support (No. 2012TS034).

References (118)

  • J.R. McCutcheon et al.

    A novel ammonia–carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process

    Desalination

    (2005)
  • T.Y. Cath et al.

    A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2010)
  • V. Yangali-Quintanilla et al.

    Indirect desalination of Red Sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • R. Alnaizy et al.

    Copper sulfate as draw solute in forward osmosis desalination

    J. Environ. Chem. Eng.

    (2013)
  • S.K. Yen et al.

    Study of draw solutes using 2-methylimidazole-based compounds in forward osmosis

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2010)
  • Q. Ge et al.

    Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes

    Water Res.

    (2012)
  • M.L. Stone et al.

    An initial study of hexavalent phosphazene salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • M.L. Stone et al.

    Switchable polarity solvents as draw solutes for forward osmosis

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • N.T. Hau et al.

    Exploration of EDTA sodium salt as novel draw solution in forward osmosis process for dewatering of high nutrient sludge

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • K. Lutchmiah et al.

    Zwitterions as alternative draw solutions in forward osmosis for application in wastewater reclamation

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • H. Bai et al.

    Highly water soluble and recovered dextran coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for brackish water desalination

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2011)
  • M.M. Ling et al.

    Desalination process using super hydrophilic nanoparticles via forward osmosis integrated with ultrafiltration regeneration

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • M.M. Ling et al.

    Novel dual-stage FO system for sustainable protein enrichment using nanoparticles as intermediate draw solutes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2011)
  • R. Ou et al.

    Thermo-sensitive polyelectrolytes as draw solutions in forward osmosis process

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • D. Zhao et al.

    Thermoresponsive copolymer-based draw solution for seawater desalination in a combined process of forward osmosis and membrane distillation

    Desalination

    (2014)
  • Y. Cai et al.

    Towards temperature driven forward osmosis desalination using semi-IPN hydrogels as reversible draw agents

    Water Res.

    (2013)
  • A. Razmjou et al.

    Effect of particle size on the performance of forward osmosis desalination by stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a draw agent

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • J.R. McCutcheon et al.

    Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • R.L. McGinnis et al.

    Energy requirements of ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination

    Desalination

    (2007)
  • R.L. McGinnis et al.

    Pilot demonstration of the NH3/CO2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • A. Perez-Gonzalez et al.

    State of the art and review on the treatment technologies of water reverse osmosis concentrates

    Water Res.

    (2012)
  • J. Kim et al.

    Reverse osmosis (RO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) hybrid processes: model-based scenario study

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • L.F. Greenlee et al.

    Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges

    Water Res.

    (2009)
  • B. Peñate et al.

    Current trends and future prospects in the design of seawater reverse osmosis desalination technology

    Desalination

    (2012)
  • A. Altaee et al.

    Comparison between forward osmosis–reverse osmosis and reverse osmosis processes for seawater desalination

    Desalination

    (2014)
  • O.A. Bamaga et al.

    Hybrid FO/RO desalination system: preliminary assessment of osmotic energy recovery and designs of new FO membrane module configurations

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • K.S. Bowden et al.

    Organic ionic salt draw solutions for osmotic membrane bioreactors

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2012)
  • B. Van der Bruggen et al.

    Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2008)
  • C.-Z. Liang et al.

    Treatment of highly concentrated wastewater containing multiple synthetic dyes by a combined process of coagulation/flocculation and nanofiltration

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • X.-L. Wang et al.

    Characterization and applications of nanofiltration membranes: state of the art

    Desalination

    (2009)
  • D.-X. Wang et al.

    Separation performance of a nanofiltration membrane influenced by species and concentration of ions

    Desalination

    (2005)
  • N. Hilal et al.

    A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy

    Desalination

    (2004)
  • A.W. Mohammad et al.

    Prediction of permeate fluxes and rejections of highly concentrated salts in nanofiltration membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • S. Zhao et al.

    Brackish water desalination by a hybrid forward osmosis–nanofiltration system using divalent draw solute

    Desalination

    (2012)
  • J. Su et al.

    Enhanced double-skinned FO membranes with inner dense layer for wastewater treatment and macromolecule recycle using sucrose as draw solute

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2012)
  • W. Gao et al.

    Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: a review

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • K.Y. Wang et al.

    Integrated forward osmosis–membrane distillation (FO–MD) hybrid system for the concentration of protein solutions

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2011)
  • S. Adham et al.

    Application of membrane distillation for desalting brines from thermal desalination plants

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • P. Wang et al.

    A conceptual demonstration of freeze desalination–membrane distillation (FD–MD) hybrid desalination process utilizing liquefied natural gas (LNG) cold energy

    Water Res.

    (2012)
  • M.S. El-Bourawi et al.

    A framework for better understanding membrane distillation separation process

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (157)

    • Combating climate change with nanoparticles

      2023, Nanoparticles and Plant-Microbe Interactions: An Environmental Perspective
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text