Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view
Introduction
Job satisfaction has been defined as “a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences” (Locke, 1976, p. 1300) or, more simply, the extent to which people enjoy their jobs (Fritzsche & Parrish, 2005). It has long been a focus of both vocational-counseling and industrial-organizational psychology researchers, although their interests in this topic typically differ. Vocational psychology, with a predominant emphasis on person-focused outcomes, tends to be concerned with job satisfaction as either an end in itself or as an aspect of individuals’ work adjustment. Organizational psychology, meanwhile, has been more concerned with the potential organizational consequences of job satisfaction, such as productivity, role engagement or withdrawal, and turnover (Fritzsche & Parrish, 2005). Although these differing perspectives have spawned largely distinct literatures, we believe that efforts to unify them may yield a more comprehensive understanding of job satisfaction—and one with increased relevance to practice.
Indeed, this may be an opportune time for integrative models of job satisfaction, as evidenced by recent empirical and theoretical advances on the larger topic of subjective well-being (SWB; Diener, Suh, Lucas, & Smith, 1999) as well as by renewed vigor in research on job satisfaction specifically. Consistent with trends in the personality literature on SWB and overall life satisfaction, organizational psychologists have shown increasing interest in the extent to which job satisfaction may be linked to dispositional factors, such as the Big Five personality factors (Judge, Heller, & Mount, 2002) and trait positive and negative affect (Thoresen, Kaplan, Barsky, Warren, & de Chermont, 2003). Organizational scholars have also begun to develop models designed to integrate affective-dispositional and situational influences on job satisfaction (e.g., Brief, 1998, Weiss and Cropanzano, 1996). From our vantage point, it would be valuable to further this integrative momentum by considering how additional variables—specifically, social-cognitive and behavioral elements—function along with affective, trait, and situational/job condition factors in promoting (or reducing) job satisfaction.
This recent research activity on life and job satisfaction (and their inter-relations; e.g., Heller, Watson, & Ilies, 2004) has, to this point, not had a great deal of impact on vocational psychology models of educational or work satisfaction. Although Dawis and Lofquist’s (1984) and Holland’s (1997) person–environment fit theories have certainly stimulated valuable research, Holland’s theory appears to offer a limited explanation of satisfaction (Tranberg, Slane, & Ekeberg, 1993), and neither theory has incorporated more recent advances on dispositional and situational influences on job satisfaction.
The purpose of this article is to propose social cognitive career theory (SCCT; Lent et al., 1994) as a foundation for forging closer linkages between vocational and organizational perspectives on job satisfaction. Based on Bandura’s (1986) larger social cognitive framework, SCCT currently consists of three segmental models of vocational-educational interest development, choice, and performance. Yet it also seems possible to adapt many of the theory’s central person and contextual variables to fashion a fourth model, one focused on job satisfaction (and relevant to other aspects of work-related affect as well). After outlining the model, we consider its implications for future research and practice.
In this article, we use the terms job and work satisfaction interchangeably. Our focus also includes the domain of educational or academic satisfaction, that is, enjoyment of one’s role or experiences as a student. We include it here alongside work satisfaction because, in SCCT, school and work are viewed as dovetailing developmental spheres, with adjustment in each being subject to similar causal determinants. A more general, integrative model may therefore help to explain satisfaction in both spheres, though research on the model would require context or role-specific measures. For convenience, we mostly refer to “work satisfaction,” but we intend for educational satisfaction to fit within this larger conceptual umbrella.
Section snippets
A social-cognitive view of work and educational satisfaction
Lent (2004) proposed a unifying perspective on subjective and psychological well-being in which cognitive, behavioral, social, and personality/affective variables jointly determine domain-specific and global life satisfaction. This model attempts to integrate “top down” (dispositional) and “bottom up” (situational) approaches to the study of well-being. Although these approaches have previously been studied as competing explanatory schemes, a number of writers have cited the potential to
Implications and future directions
We believe the social cognitive model of work satisfaction holds useful implications for future research and intervention efforts. We highlight several directions for such work in this section.
Conclusions
We intended for our social cognitive model of educational/vocational satisfaction to be broadly integrative at several levels. First, we hoped it would suggest ways to unify personality and situational perspectives on work affect by considering the specific paths by which social, cognitive, and behavioral mechanisms operate jointly with trait influences. In so doing, we tried to highlight agentic means by which people can contribute to their own work well-being, rather than assume that they are
References (36)
- et al.
The role of affectivity in job satisfaction: A meta-analysis
Personality and Individual Differences
(2000) - et al.
Advances in vocational theory and research: A 20-year retrospective
Journal of Vocational Behavior
(1991) - et al.
Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
(1976) - et al.
Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]
Journal of Vocational Behavior
(1994) - et al.
The relation between interest congruence and satisfaction: A metaanalysis
Journal of Vocational Behavior
(1993) - et al.
General factors of affective temperament and their relation to job satisfaction over time
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(1993) - et al.
An examination of the joint effects of affective experiences and job beliefs on job satisfaction and variations in affective experiences over time
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(1999) Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory
(1986)Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
(1997)- et al.
Organizational role stress
Attitudes in and around organizations
Why are so many people happy and what do we do for those who aren’t? A reaction to Lightsey (1996)
The Counseling Psychologist
Life task participation and well-being: The importance of taking part in daily life
Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction
Journal of Educational Psychology
A psychological theory of work adjustment
Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress
Psychological Bulletin
Theories and research on job satisfaction
The confounding role of personality and trait affectivity in the relationship between job and life satisfaction
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Cited by (326)
Miss or match? The impact of PhD training on job market satisfaction
2024, Research PolicyDriving the dual learning process of management knowledge: A social cognitive theory perspective
2024, International Journal of Management EducationProcedural justice and well-being at work: Moderating role of self-variables and work locus of control
2023, Revue Europeenne de Psychologie AppliqueeEmotional intelligence and career-related outcomes: A meta-analysis
2023, Human Resource Management ReviewJob and life satisfaction of apprentices: the effect of personality, social relations, and decent work
2024, Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training