Review

Evidence supporting the use of two-hourly turning for pressure ulcer prevention

Documentation presents an overwhelming burden to bedside clinical nurses. Nurses must manually enter several hundred data points into electronic health record flow sheets, taking time from direct patient care and introducing opportunity for documentation errors.

A patient record audit revealed a significant gap in documented patient repositioning events. This quality improvement initiative evaluated automated repositioning documentation via a wearable sensor system.

A pretest-posttest design was used to examine retrospectively collected manual documentation and prospectively collected sensor documentation of patient repositioning events in a 148-bed rural community hospital. Repositioning documentation manually entered into electronic health records during the baseline period (January 1 to February 28, 2018) was compared with automatic, sensor-based repositioning documentation during the implementation period (corresponding months in 2019 and 2020 to eliminate seasonality).

A convenience sample of 105 patient records was reviewed. The mean documented patient repositioning interval was 6.6 hours in the baseline period and 2.4 hours in the implementation period. The improvement was most pronounced in patients with obesity, whose mean repositioning interval improved from 9.4 hours to 2.5 hours. Documentation compliance (actual vs expected repositioning documentation) was 31% with manual documentation and 82% with automatic sensor-based documentation.

Repositioning was documented more than 2.5 times as frequently with sensor technology as with manual data entry. Body position and reasons for delayed repositioning events were documented more completely with sensor technology. Automated documentation may improve the accuracy of electronic health records and reduce the documentation burden for nurses.

Guidelines recommending head of bed (HOB) elevation greater than 30º to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia conflict with guidelines to prevent pressure ulcers, which recommend HOB elevation less than 30º.

To examine the feasibility of 45º HOB elevation and describe and compare the occurrence of reflux, aspiration, and pressure ulcer development at 30º and 45º HOB elevation.

A randomized 2-day crossover trial was conducted. HOB angle was measured every 30 seconds. Oral and tracheal secretions were analyzed for pepsin presence. Skin was assessed for pressure ulcers. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Kendall τ correlations were conducted.

Fifteen patients were enrolled; 11 completed both days. Patients were maintained at 30º (mean, 30º) for 96% of minutes and at 45º (mean, 39º) for 77% of minutes. No patients showed signs of pressure ulcers. A total of 188 oral secretions were obtained, 82 (44%) were pepsin-positive; 174 tracheal secretions were obtained, 108 (62%) were pepsin-positive. The median percentage of pepsin-positive oral secretions was not significantly higher (P = .11) at 30º elevation (54%) than at 45º elevation (20%). The median percentage of pepsin-positive tracheal secretions was not significantly higher (P = .37) at 30º elevation (71%) than 45º elevation (67%). Deeper sedation correlated with increased reflux (P = .03).

HOB elevation greater than 30º is feasible and preferred to 30º for reducing oral secretion volume, reflux, and aspiration without pressure ulcer development in gastric-fed patients receiving mechanical ventilation. More deeply sedated patients may benefit from higher HOB elevations.