Pediatric/Congenital/Developmental
Antibiotic utilization based on primary treatment of pediatric empyema

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.053Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Chemical fibrinolysis has been shown to be as effective as surgical debridement for the treatment of pediatric empyema. However, no studies effectively evaluate antibiotic treatment. We evaluated antibiotic utilization among different treatments of pediatric empyema.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of 169 empyema patients who underwent chemical and/or mechanical fibrinolysis at a dedicated children's hospital from 2005–2013. Data points included duration of therapy, cultures, presence of necrosis or abscess, and adverse drug reactions. Immunocompromised patients and those with additional foci of infection were excluded.

Results

Twenty-seven patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), 123 had chemical fibrinolysis via tube thoracostomy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and 19 had tPA followed by VATS. The mean (±standard deviation) duration of total antibiotic therapy was 25.7 ± 6.5 d; following a 24 h afebrile period of 19.4 ± 6.3 d. Patients who had tPA had a significantly shorter duration of parenteral antibiotic therapy when compared with primary VATS (9.2 ± 3.6 d versus 11.6 ± 5.5 d, P = 0.04) and VATS following tPA (9.2 ± 3.6 d versus 14.3 ± 8.1 d, P < 0.01). Patients with necrosis or abscess (n = 26) had an increased total duration of antibiotics (29.3 ± 5.7 d versus 25.1 ± 6.4 d, P < 0.01). Seventy patients (41%) had an adverse reaction related to antibiotic use.

Conclusions

Patients with empyema currently receive a protracted variable course of antibiotic therapy influenced by primary treatment and the presence of necrosis or abscess. With a high incidence of adverse reactions, a standardized protocol with truncated treatment duration should be considered.

Introduction

The treatment of pediatric empyema has undergone a significant transformation over the course of the past decade. Mechanical debridement was originally performed by thoracotomy, progressing to a minimally invasive approach via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). When compared to a thoracostomy tube, VATS resulted in a more timely and thorough resolution of the pleural space disease [1]. However, practitioners have begun injecting tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) via the thoracostomy tube, which results in disruption of the tissue loculations leading to adequate drainage. Two randomized studies comparing mechanical debridement (VATS) and chemical debridement (tPA or urokinase) found no difference in the length of hospitalization or other outcome parameters except surgical debridement was more expensive [2], [3].

No studies have been completed evaluating the appropriate length of antibiotic therapy for empyema. The current recommendation is a 10-d course once afebrile [1]. However, this is a grade D recommendation and traditionally, patients have continued antimicrobial therapy much longer. One study found an average parenteral antibiotic duration of 24 d although fever abated by 9 d raising the concern that increased duration of therapy could contribute to bacterial resistance [4]. A recent survey of infectious disease experts failed to reach a consensus on antibiotic selection or duration for empyema. Thirty-five percent recommended 11–14-d treatment, 41% advised 15–21 d, and 17% recommended >21 d [5]. We sought to assess the current medical treatment of empyema in our institution to help establish an evidence-based treatment protocol.

Section snippets

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis on children with empyema who underwent chemical and/or mechanical fibrinolysis after institutional review board approval (14070291). Inclusion criteria were age <18 y and diagnosis of empyema requiring chemical or mechanical debridement between 2005 and 2013. In our center, triggers for definitive therapy include septations or loculations in the pleural space visualized on imaging or patients with pleural fluid containing white blood cell count >10,000

Results

A total of 179 patients were identified and 169 included in the analysis. Ten patients were excluded, including those with immunocompromised state (n = 4), additional sites of infection (n = 5), or both (n = 1). Demographics revealed a mean age (±standard deviation) of 6.2 ± 4.8 y. There were 78 females (46%) and 91 males (54%; Table 1). The average days of symptoms before admission were 7.3 ± 4.3 d. There were 1.8 ± 1.2 visits to a pediatrician, emergency department, or outside hospital before

Discussion

Most pediatric empyema cases are due to S pneumoniae; however, even with the emergence of heptavalent protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine, the incidence of empyema in children under two doubled after its release; the rates among children aged 2–4 nearly tripled [6], prompting development of a 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine in 2010. Since that time there has been evidence that complicated pneumococcal pneumonia may be declining [7]. Our study included patients treated for empyema both

Conclusions

Patients diagnosed with empyema are currently placed on a protracted and variable time course of antibiotic therapy, which seems to be influenced by primary treatment and the presence of necrosis or abscess. Because nearly half of our population experienced side effects from antimicrobial therapy, a standardized protocol with truncated duration of treatment should be used, which will reduce variability, duration of therapy, and costs.

Acknowledgment

Authors' contributions: K.W.G., B.G.A.D., and S.D.S.P. contributed to the literature search. K.W.G., B.G.A.D., A.L.M., J.G.N., and S.D.S.P. did the study design. K.W.G. and B.G.A.D. did the data collection. K.W.G. and S.D.S.P. did the analysis, interpretation, and writing. K.W.G., A.L.M., J.G.N., and S.D.S.P. did the critical revision.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (7)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text