Field evaluation of the long-lasting treated storage bag, deltamethrin incorporated, (ZeroFly® Storage Bag) as a barrier to insect pest infestation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2016.11.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The ZeroFly® storage bag was effective in suppressing insect population levels.

  • The ZeroFly storage bag reduced insect damaged kernels (IDK) and maize weight loss.

  • Percentage IDK in the control increased over time and reached 32% after 6 months.

  • The ZeroFly storage bag with insect-free grains could provide long-term storage.

Abstract

The deltamethrin incorporated polypropylene (PP) bag, ZeroFly® Storage Bag, is a new technology to reduce postharvest losses caused by stored-product insect pests. Maize was pre-fumigated and used for the following treatments: ZeroFly bags filled with untreated maize, PP bags filled with maize treated with Betallic Super (80 g pirimiphos-methyl and 15 g permethrin per liter as an emulsifiable concentrate (EC)), and PP bags filled with untreated maize (control). The experiment was conducted from February–August 2015, at four sites in different locations of the Middle Belt of Ghana. Moisture content (MC), number of live and dead insects, insect damaged kernels (IDK) and maize weight loss data were collected monthly. ZeroFly bags and Betallic treatment significantly reduced insect damage compared to the control treatment. ZeroFly bags were able to keep IDK levels below 5% for 4 months, but the levels increased to 5.2 and 10.2% by 5 and 6 months of storage, respectively. In the control, IDK increased significantly over time and reached 32% after 6 months. The ZeroFly bag was effective against Sitophilus, Tribolium and Cryptolestes species for 4 months. Mean weight loss of ≤3.68% was recorded in ZeroFly bags during 6 months of storage whereas 11.88% weight loss occurred in the PP bags by 6 months of storage. Based on our results, ZeroFly bags were found to have potential for use in the reduction of postharvest grain losses in bagged grains. Maize may still have been infested during bagging hence ZeroFly bags were effective for storage for only 4 months. However, greater benefits of using ZeroFly bags are realized if insect-free grains or legumes are stored in bags.

Introduction

Most of the calorie and protein needs of humans are obtained from cereal grains, grain legumes and oilseeds (Cordain, 1999). Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the important cereal grains grown widely throughout the world. It is a major staple food in Africa (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2004, Tefera et al., 2011), and significantly contributes to household food security for smallholder farmers (Baoua et al., 2014). From 2008 to 2011, maize was planted on approximately 31.1 million ha of land in sub-Saharan Africa, and the average annual production during this period was 56.7 million tons (AGRA, 2014). However, due to poor storage techniques, maize producers in developing nations experience considerable losses after harvest (Giga et al., 1991, Boxall, 2001, Alonso-Amelot and Avila-Núñez, 2011).

Over the past few decades, postharvest loss estimation and measures to effect mitigation of these losses have been high on the international agenda (Food and Agriculture Organization, 1999, FAO and World Bank, 2011, Abass et al., 2014, Affognon et al., 2015). Despite international focus on postharvest loss issues, farmers in the developing nations still face significant losses. Estimates of postharvest losses vary in literature, and global figures for losses of 9–40% are often quoted (Pimental, 2002, FAO and World Bank, 2011, Parfitt et al., 2010, Tefera, 2012, Hodges et al., 2014). Postharvest losses can arise from inappropriate storage techniques, deterioration by insect pests and rodents, high ambient temperature and high relative humidity (FAO and World Bank, 2011, Anankware et al., 2013, Abass et al., 2014). However, most of the postharvest losses result from damage caused by storage insect pests (Giga et al., 1991, Bett and Nguyo, 2007). Infestation of stored maize by insect pests may produce unpleasant odors, render the grain unfit for consumption, reduce nutritional content and grain quantity thereby leading to low market prices (Hill, 1990, Jood and Kapoor, 1992, Food and Agriculture Organization, 2004, Mboya, 2013). Furthermore, insects can facilitate entry of fungal spores into kernels or seeds by breaking the seed coat; they also disseminate of fungal spores, hence potentially contributing to increased production of mycotoxins that are carcinogenic and immunosuppressive to humans (Khan et al., 2016).

A number of stored-product insect pests, which ultimately cause quantitative and qualitative deterioration (FAO, 2009), can infest stored maize. Of the pests that infest maize, beetles and moths are the most important. Sitophilus oryzae (L.), the rice weevil, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn), the larger grain borer, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst), the red flour beetle, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner), the Indianmeal moth, Sitotroga cerealella (Oliver), the Angoumois grain moth, and Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), the lesser grain borer, are the most important pests of stored maize (USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 1986, Rees, 2004, Groot, 2004, Hagstrum et al., 2012).

Effective grain storage can reduce pest activity and can help secure food quality and quantity until the next harvest season. For storage of cereal grains and grain legumes, farmers in sub-Saharan Africa predominantly use traditional storage techniques such as open platforms, woven baskets, pots, mud rhombuses, maize cribs, bamboo storage structures, straw roofed storage structures, underground storage, bag storage and warehouses (Food and Agriculture Organization, 1994a, Adejumo and Raji, 2007). Because most of the aforementioned structures are made of locally available materials, smallscale farmers find them economically feasible to construct. Storing cereals in sacks such as jute or polypropylene bags is currently the most common storage technique (Food and Agriculture Organization, 1994a, Koona et al., 2007; De Groote et al. 2013). However, postharvest losses do occur in bagged commodities that are not subjected to insect pest management actions; losses of up to 60% have been reported in maize that is stored using traditional polypropylene bags (Costa, 2014).

Farmers in developed countries use grain protectants and fumigants to control insect pests of stored maize (White, 1995, Arthur, 1996, Zettler and Arthur, 2000). Some challenges to pesticide use are that resource-poor smallholder farmers in developing countries find the cost of pesticides prohibitive, thereby making them unaffordable, and these chemicals have been abused and misused by farmers in ways that pose risks to human health and the environment (Kamanula et al., 2011, Hodges et al., 2014). Additionally, insects develop resistance to chemical insecticides making them less effective (Opit et al., 2012). Therefore, a need exists for the development of reduced-risk approaches for managing insect infestations in bagged grain. Additionally, ways of scaling up reduced risk technologies are needed because farmers in developing countries have been too slow to adopt such technologies (USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 1986, Kaminski and Christiaensen, 2014).

In rural parts of Ghana, most maize produced by smallholder farmers is traditionally stored in jute or polypropylene bags (Food and Agriculture Organization, 1994a, Akramov and Malek, 2012, Anankware and Bornu-Ire, 2013). These bags often do not protect the grains against insect pests, leading to heavy losses. Reducing postharvest losses in bagged grain could increase smallholder farmers' income and contribute to increased food security. The need for a bag that effectively mitigates infestation of grain stored in it led to the idea of insecticide-containing fabrics for storage bags. Several studies have documented evaluation of bags with insecticide-containing fabrics for the control of stored product pests (Parkin, 1948, Atkins and Greer, 1953, Muthu and Pingale, 1955); but the bags tested were not commercially available then and are still unavailable to date. The concept of insecticide-incorporated textile has been successful in mosquito nets for mosquito control to mitigate malaria (Barlow et al., 2001). Building on the concept of insecticide-containing fabrics for storage bags, Vestergaard SA, Lausanne, Switzerland has developed a deltamethrin incorporated polypropylene bag (ZeroFly® Storage Bag), which has great potential to reduce postharvest losses of cereal grains and grain legumes stored in it for use in developing countries (Anankware et al., 2014, Costa, 2014). The ZeroFly bag is designed to give protection to commodities by preventing the entry of insect pests, thereby facilitating preservation of cereal grains and grain legumes. However, there is little published data on field trials with the ZeroFly Storage Bag. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the ZeroFly bag to protect maize from infestation by stored-product insect pests under field conditions in Ghana.

Section snippets

study sites

This experiment was conducted in four warehouses, in three major maize growing areas located in the “middle belt” of Ghana, a transitional ecological zone of Ghana between the coastal and upland areas. The warehouses were in Ejura (located at a longitude 1°5 W and 1°39′ W and latitude 7°9 N and 7°36 N) ― two warehouses, Techiman (located at a longitude 1°42 54 W and latitude 6°3725 N) and Wenchi (longitude 2° 6′ 0″ W and latitude 7° 45′ 0″ N). The experiment was conducted during the period

Moisture content

For moisture content measured by the PHL or JD meters, there was no significant interaction between storage period and treatment (Table 1). Effects of storage period were significant for both PHL and JD meters (Fig. 1; Table 1). For moisture content measurements taken on the same bags of maize at approximately the same time, there was a ≤2% difference in the moisture content measured by the PHL and JD meters (Fig. 1) ― here ≤2% refers to MC units as opposed to either PHL or JD MC measurements

Discussion

Based on our data, maize moisture content at the start of the storage period (February) was 11–13%, a MC level considered safe for storage of maize (Food and Agricultural Organization, 1994b, Food and Agricultural Organization, 2011). However, moisture content increased over the storage period, in all treatments, and was significantly higher after 6 months of storage in August. The MC levels in August were 13–14.8%. It is possible that insects infesting maize contributed to increase in MC, but

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by Vestergaard SA, Lausanne, Switzerland (Grant No. 2-5-18600); additional funding was provided by Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station (Project No. OKL2949). This paper reports the results of research only. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by Oklahoma State University, the USDA-ARS, Vestergaard SA, KNUST, or PENS Food

References (56)

  • J. Kaminski et al.

    Post-harvest loss in sub-Saharan Africa — what do farmers say?

    Glob. Food Secur.

    (2014)
  • P. Koona et al.

    Impregnated bags for safer storage of legume grains in West and Central Africa

    J. Stored Prod. Res.

    (2007)
  • T. Tefera et al.

    The metal silo: an effective grain storage technology for reducing post-harvest insect and pathogen losses in maize while improving smallholder farmers' food security in developing countries

    Crop Prot.

    (2011)
  • J.L. Zettler et al.

    Chemical control of stored product insects with fumigants and residual treatments

    Crop Prot.

    (2000)
  • B.A. Adejumo et al.

    Technical appraisal of grain storage system in the Nigerian Sudan savannah. Agricultural Engineering International

    Int. Comm. Agric. Eng. (CIGR) Ejournal

    (2007)
  • AGRA

    Africa Agriculture Status Report: Climate Change and Smallholder Agriculture in Sub-saharan Africa

    (2014)
  • K. Akramov et al.

    Analyzing Profitability of Maize, Rice, and Soybean Production in Ghana: Results of PAM and DEA Analysis

    (2012)
  • J.P. Anankware et al.

    Cost benefit analysis of the triple-layer hermetic bag in maize storage

    Glob. J. Multidiscip. Appl. Sci.

    (2013)
  • J.P.A. Anankware et al.

    Use of the triple-layer hermetic bag against the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Mots) in three varieties of maize

    J. Biol. Agric. Healthc.

    (2013)
  • J.P. Anankware et al.

    Deltamethrin contact bioassay and boring/chewing tests with the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Mot)

    Int. J. Agric. Res. Revolut.

    (2014)
  • W.G. Atkins et al.

    The storage of flour in jute bags treated with insecticides

    J. Sci. Food Agric.

    (1953)
  • C. Bett et al.

    Post-harvest storage practices and techniques used by farmers in semi-arid Eastern and Central Kenya

  • L. Cordain

    Cereal grains: humanity's double-edged sword

    World Rev. Nutr. Diet.

    (1999)
  • S.J. Costa

    Reducing Food Losses in Sub-saharan Africa: an ‘Action Research’ Evaluation Trial from Uganda and Burkina Faso

    (2014)
  • Food and Agricultural Organization

    Towards Integrated Commodity and Pest Management in Grain Storage: a Training Manual for Application in Humid Tropical Storage Systems

    (1992)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization

    Grain Storage Techniques: Evolution and Trends in Developing Countries

    (1994)
  • Food and Agricultural Organization

    African Experience in the Improvement of Post-harvest Technique

    (1994)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization

    Wheat: Post-harvest Operations, in Post-harvest Compendium

    (1999)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text