Effects of Cry1F and Cry34Ab1/35Ab1 on storage pests
Introduction
Storage pests cause economic losses to stored grain and grain products worldwide. For example, in 2008 22.6 million bushels of corn and 4.3 million bushels of wheat were harvested in the U.S., with receipts of $64 billion (http://www.nass.usda.gov). Postharvest losses due to insect pests, estimated at 5–10% (Cuperus, 1995), would have contributed to losses of $3.2–6.4 billion for that year alone. In developing countries, the losses can be much higher (Haines, 2000).
The arsenal of traditional synthetic chemical controls used by the cereal industry is rapidly being depleted because of increased regulatory constraints and insect resistance. Most of the current grain protectants are organophosphates, under scrutiny by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because of the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act. Methyl bromide, a fumigant used for stored products and milling structures, was banned under the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol, with a few exceptions noted in exemptions by the EPA. Other fumigants, such as sulfuryl fluoride, must be custom applied and are not generally considered compatible with IPM. In addition, many fumigants carry significant human health risks and are regulated by exposure and ventilation restrictions.
Because of all of these constraints, new insecticidal treatments are needed for integrated pest management (IPM) of raw grains, mills, and food storage facilities. We seek treatments that are effective against target pests, safe to the environment and non-target organisms (including insect predators/parasites), while also minimizing the development of resistant insect populations. The insecticidal toxins from the common soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt) are the most successful and widely used biopesticides to date and provide many of these use and safety attributes.
Transgenic corn hybrids expressing the insecticidal crystal (Cry) protein Cry1Ab from Bt have been available for commercial planting since the mid 1990’s. Transgenic grain and processed grain fractions were found to be less susceptible to attack and damage by lepidopteran stored-grain pests (Sedlacek et al., 2001). However, resistance to Bt was first noted in a major stored grain pest, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Indian mealmoth) (McGaughey, 1985), and resistance to Cry1A toxins has been observed in many lepidopteran insects (Ferré and Van Rie, 2002). Therefore, there is a need to evaluate and understand the spectrum and efficacy of novel Bt proteins against stored-grain insects to predict and prolong the efficacy of transgenic grain to reduce damage by storage pests.
Cry1F (Event TC1507) was commercially available in hybrid corn in the United States in 2003 under the trade name Herculex™1 I Insect Protection. This product controls several destructive foliar and kernel feeding Lepidoptera. Cry1F transgenic corn negatively impacted the growth and development of both Bt-susceptible and -resistant populations of P. interpunctella selected with Dipel1 (http://www.reeis.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/190198.html). Cry34/35Ab1 (Herculex® RW Rootworm Protection) are Bt proteins expressed simultaneously in corn to protect against damage to the roots by the larvae of the coleopteran western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte) and northern corn rootworm (Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence) (Moellenbeck et al., 2001). Neither Cry1F nor Cry34/35Ab1 has been widely evaluated for the potential to control stored-grain insects. The research detailed here provides some insight into the activity of these proteins for the management of destructive coleopteran and lepidopteran stored-grain insects.
Section snippets
Insect colonies and bioassays
Insects were obtained from stock cultures maintained at the Grain Marketing and Production Research Center in Manhattan KS and included: the Angoumois grain moth, Sitrotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae); the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae); the Indian mealmoth, Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae); the warehouse beetle, Trogoderma variabile Ballion (Coleoptera: Dermestidae);
Results
The efficacy of Cry1F and Cry34/35Ab1 was evaluated in a number of stored-products pests. Various parameters were measured to determine the effects of toxins on different lepidopteran and coleopteran pests, such as mortality, growth inhibition, and/or development time. Appropriate parameters were selected for each stored-grain pest based on the feeding behavior and basic biology of each insect, i.e., some insects are amenable to weighing, whereas others are internal feeders and/or more
Discussion
With the loss of fumigants and sprays due to resistance or increasing regulatory scrutiny, the development of new control products for storage pests is critical. The efficacy of Cry1A toxins against lepidopterans, including major moth pests in stored products, has been well-documented (reviewed in Ferré and Van Rie, 2002). However, the ecology of storage pests, found in confined spaces, suggests a propensity for resistance. In fact, the first reported case of resistance to Bt products was from
Acknowledgements
We thank Carlos Blanco for his thoughtful comments and suggestions. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
References (25)
IPM for food storage in developing countries: 20th Century aspirations for the 21st Century
Crop Protection
(2000)- et al.
Analysis of midgut proteinases from Bacillus thuringiensis-susceptible and -resistant Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology
(2007) - et al.
Comparative analysis of proteinase activities of Bacillus thuringiensis-resistant and -susceptible Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
(2004) - et al.
Binding analyses of Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac with membrane vesicles from Bacillus thuringiensis-resistant and -susceptible Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
(2004) - et al.
Altered protoxin activation by midgut enzymes from a Bacillus thuringiensis resistant strain of Plodia interpunctella
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
(1994) - et al.
Luminal proteinases from Plodia interpunctella and the hydrolysis of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(c) protoxin
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
(1996) - et al.
Proteinase-mediated resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxins
Journal of Biological Chemistry
(1997) - et al.
Integrative model for binding of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in susceptible and resistant larvae of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella)
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(1999) - et al.
Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin Nomenclature
(2009) Why stored product integrated pest management is needed
Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis
Annual Review of Entomology
Different mechanisms of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in the Indianmeal moth
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Cited by (23)
Analysis of cross-resistance to Vip3 proteins in eight insect colonies, from four insect species, selected for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins
2018, Journal of Invertebrate PathologyCitation Excerpt :Two P. interpunctella strains were used to characterize their response to Vip3Aa. The P. interpunctella susceptible colony, EP, was obtained from a grain storage bin and has been maintained in the laboratory on cracked wheat diet (Oppert et al., 2010). The resistant colony EP-Dpl500 was selected from the parental EP, with 500 mg Dipel (Bt subspecies kurstaki, strain HD-1) per kg diet, gradually increasing the dose to 10,000 mg/kg, the maintenance dose for this resistant colony.
Mitochondrial genome of Diaphania indica(saunders) (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea) and implications for its phylogeny
2018, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesCitation Excerpt :The superfamily contains many economically important pests of forests, crops, stored products, and ornamental plants [11,12]. In addition, the Pyraloidea serve as models in the studies of biodiversity and community ecology [13–15], population ecology, management [13,16], behavioral ecology [17,18], genetics, evolution of pheromone communication systems [19,20], as well as in physiology and development [21,22]. Owing the importance of the Pyraloidea, researchers all over the world are making extensive efforts to resolve discrepancies in the phylogenetic relationships within the subfamilies using molecular techniques.
Penetration through the peritrophic matrix is a key to lectin toxicity against Tribolium castaneum
2014, Journal of Insect PhysiologyCitation Excerpt :This might explain the negative effects observed only at relatively high concentrations of the lectins (1–2% w/w). The low permeability of the PM in T. castaneum could be responsible for the generally low susceptibility of this species to toxic proteins, as was also evident in studies of Oppert et al. (2010, 2011) and Contreras et al. (2013a,b). These authors demonstrated that T. castaneum larvae are resistant to Cry3Aa, Cry3Ca and Cry34Ab/Cry35Ab and susceptible only to high concentrations of Cry3Ba and Cry23Aa/Cry37Aa.
Improved high-throughput bioassay for Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae)
2013, Journal of Stored Products ResearchCitation Excerpt :It was gently washed with 1 ml aliquots of water until the diet was washed through the sieve (leaving insects and frass). In previous bioassays, raw wheat germ permitted the fastest development of R. dominica larvae (Oppert et al., 2010, 2011). For high-throughput assays, we investigated a diet of egg yolk powder, yeast, and amylopectin.
A novel Bacillus thuringiensis strain and its pathogenicity against three important pest insects
2012, Journal of Stored Products ResearchCitation Excerpt :Similarly, in a study carried out with Cry1Aa, Cry1Ac, and Cry2Aa toxin mixture against larvae of E. kuehniella, the calculated LC50 value was 109.7 ng mg−1 (Tounsi et al., 2005). The slight difference of toxicity between strains could be due to spore crystal ratio, different Cry protein contents and activity of trypsin (Oppert et al., 2010). In another study, Shojaaddini et al. (2012) reported that their new Bta strain exhibited a high toxicity (7.13 μg mg−1) against P. interpunctella larvae.