Online Article
Psychosocial factors affecting outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.043Get rights and content

Background

Both anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are considered successful surgeries to treat a variety of painful shoulder conditions. Although implant survivorship for both is good to excellent in the long term, a variety of factors—clinical, technical, and psychosocial—may affect patient-reported outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed systematically using keywords “shoulder arthroplasty outcomes,” “psychosocial factors shoulder,” “shoulder replacement outcomes,” “depression shoulder arthroplasty,” “satisfaction shoulder arthroplasty,” “factors shoulder replacement,” “expectations shoulder arthroplasty,” and “predictors shoulder arthroplasty.” Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and analyzed. Type of surgery performed, sample size, outcome measures, and other factors influencing patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six reviewed mental health disorders as predictors of postoperative outcome after shoulder arthroplasty. Of these, 4 found that disorders such a depression and anxiety were associated with increased risk of perioperative complications and lower final functional outcome scores. Two studies evaluated workers' compensation status as a possible predictor of outcomes and found that patients with claims had lower satisfaction and outcome scores at final follow-up compared with those without claims. Two studies showed that preoperative opioid use was associated with lower outcome scores and overall satisfaction rate after shoulder arthroplasty. Three studies showed that higher patient confidence and preoperative expectations were correlated with better outcomes.

Conclusion

Our review shows that psychosocial factors may play just as important role in affecting patient outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty as technical factors.

Section snippets

Search strategy

A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. One independent reviewer systematically searched the databases PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The following date range was used in the search engines: May 30, 2000, to May 30, 2019. The following combination of keywords was used for the search: “shoulder arthroplasty outcomes,” “psychosocial factors shoulder,” “shoulder

Study characteristics

There were 16 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Level of evidence, study design, clinical question answered, and average follow-up for each of the included studies are presented in Table I. The included studies looked at outcomes after revision and primary cases. The study population underwent either TSA or rTSA. Psychosocial factors influencing shoulder arthroplasty outcomes included preoperative opioid use, preoperative patient expectations, diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or other

Discussion

Our analysis reveals that pre-existing diagnosis of a mental health disorder, an active WC claim, and preoperative opioid use are correlated with lower patient-reported postoperative outcome scores after shoulder arthroplasty compared with unaffected controls.25,32, 33, 34,50,51 These results are similar to outcome studies in hip and knee arthroplasty. Duivenvoorden et al12 showed that patients with preoperative anxiety and depressive symptoms had worse patient-reported outcomes and less

Conclusion

Our review suggests that preoperative diagnosis of mental health disorders, WC status, preoperative opioid use, patients' expectations and confidence level, patients' resilience, health insurance status, and amount of manual labor required for work all affect patient-reported postoperative outcomes after TSA. Psychosocial factors may play just as important, if not more, a role in affecting patient outcomes after TSA as technical factors.

Disclaimer

The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

References (53)

  • R.P. Harris et al.

    Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process

    Am J Prev Med

    (2001)
  • C.A. Jacobs et al.

    Comparison of satisfied and dissatisfied patients 2 to 5 years after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2016)
  • A. Jawa et al.

    Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for patients receiving workers' compensation

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2015)
  • J.R. Kang et al.

    Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary implants is associated with very low reoperation rates

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2019)
  • T.K. Kiet et al.

    Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2015)
  • F. Montoya et al.

    Midterm results of a total shoulder prosthesis fixed with a cementless glenoid component

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2013)
  • B.J. Morris et al.

    Workers' compensation claims and outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2015)
  • B.J. Morris et al.

    Preoperative opioid use and outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2015)
  • B.J. Morris et al.

    Preoperative opioid use associated with worse outcomes after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2016)
  • R.C. Rauck et al.

    Effect of preoperative patient expectations on outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2018)
  • R. Simovitch et al.

    Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2018)
  • J.F. Styron et al.

    Greater patient confidence yields greater functional outcomes after primary total shoulder arthroplasty

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2015)
  • J.M. Tokish et al.

    Resilience correlates with outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2017)
  • M.E. Torchia et al.

    Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (1997)
  • S.P. Vajapey et al.

    Treatment of extensor tendon disruption after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

    J Arthroplasty

    (2019)
  • M.M. Vissers et al.

    Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

    Semin Arthritis Rheum

    (2012)
  • Cited by (41)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This systematic review of the literature did not require the approval of the Biomedical Institutional Review Board of The Ohio State University.

    View full text