Review
Variations in strength-related measures during the menstrual cycle in eumenorrheic women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2020.04.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To systematically review the current body of research that has investigated changes in strength-related variables during different phases of the menstrual cycle in eumenorrheic women.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in Pubmed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science using search terms related to the menstrual cycle and strength-related measures. Two reviewers reached consensus that 21 studies met the criteria for inclusion. Methodological rigour was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Random effects meta-analyses were used to compare the early-follicular, ovulatory and mid-luteal phases for maximal voluntary contraction, isokinetic peak torque, and explosive strength.

Results

The assessment of study quality showed that a high level of bias exists in specific areas of study design. Non-significant and small or trivial effect sizes (p  0.26, Hedges g  0.35) were identified for all strength-related variables in each comparison between phases. 95% confidence intervals for each comparison suggested the uncertainty associated with each estimate extends to a small effect on strength performance with unclear direction (−0.42  g  0.48). The heterogeneity for each comparison was also small (p  0.83, I2 = 0%).

Conclusions

Strength-related measures appear to be minimally altered (g  0.35) by the fluctuations in ovarian sex hormones that occur during the menstrual cycle. This finding should be interpreted with caution due to the methodological shortcomings identified by the quality assessment.

Introduction

The menstrual cycle represents an important biological rhythm in females that serves to prepare the uterus for gestation. In eumenorrheic women, a menstrual cycle typically lasts 28 days, but can vary considerably.1 It is well-established that over the course of a menstrual cycle, women are exposed to a constant and rapidly shifting profile of endogenous sex hormones. Aside from their principal roles in reproductive function and control of sexual characteristics, the main female ovarian hormones (oestrogen and progesterone) circulating in the blood, influence a multitude of different physiological systems. Fluctuations in these, and other sex hormones, can explain variations in physical performance and physiological responses to exercise over the course of a menstrual cycle,2 which has important implications for scientific research and the optimization of exercise prescription in females. In particular, the effect that changes in female reproductive hormones exert in strength-related tasks has received considerable attention and is widely debated.2, 3, 4, 5

The menstrual cycle is traditionally divided into two distinct phases (follicular and luteal), which are separated by ovulation. These two phases are defined by ovarian function and differentiated by varying concentrations of oestrogen and progesterone. The follicular phase begins on the first day of menses (days 1–5) and is characterized by low concentrations of both oestrogen and progesterone. Oestrogen gradually increases during the follicular phase and peaks ∼1 day prior to ovulation (typically 12–14 days after menstruation onset), which is triggered by a surge in the luteinizing hormone (LH). The rise in oestrogen and LH is also accompanied by a sharp and brief increase in testosterone, which is a precursor for the biosynthesis of oestrogen, and is considered to be important for sexual function and desire in females.6 Following the ovulatory period, the early-luteal phase is characterized by decreasing oestrogen levels and a gradual rise in progesterone. Through the mid-luteal phase, oestrogen displays a bi-phasic response, resulting in high levels of both hormones before a gradual decrease over the following 5–7 days. Although this pattern of hormonal physiology is broadly present in all eumenorrheic females, the concentration of hormones and timing of cycle events, displays large inter-individual variability,7 making scientific investigation in this area complex and challenging. Therefore, although many studies have investigated the effects of menstrual cycle phase on exercise performance, it is prudent to examine the internal validity of these studies to ensure that the conclusions generated are accurate.

Oestrogen is responsible for the regulation of a number of important anabolic processes8 and can influence central nervous system function.9 Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), the precursor to oestrogen and testosterone that peaks prior to ovulation, produces a net excitatory effect via its action on several neurotransmitter receptors.10 Specifically, oestrogen is known to bind to receptor sites that attenuate the release of γ-aminobutyric acid,11 a neurotransmitter responsible for reducing neuronal excitability and muscle tone. Additionally, oestrogen promotes the activation of glutamate releasing neuron receptors that cause an excitatory response in the nervous system.12 In contrast, progesterone is known to exert a net inhibitory effect on the nervous system via enhancement of γ-aminobutyric acid action.13 Variations in testosterone level across the menstrual cycle also produce physiological effects that may alter strength-related performance. Although absolute testosterone is low in females compared to males, a surge in testosterone during the late-follicular phase may benefit performance during short-intense activity, via increases in motivational drive,14 and enhanced calcium kinetics in the muscle cell.15 It is also possible that the thermogenic action of progesterone, which causes an increase in core body and skin temperature during the luteal phase,16 positively influences nerve conduction velocity17 and antagonistic co-contraction,18 and consequently may positively influence performance in explosive strength-related tasks. Based upon these theoretical mechanisms, it is conceivable that oestrogen has an inotropic effect on muscular strength-related capabilities.

Strength can be defined as the ability of an individual to apply force under a specified set of movement constraints.19 Increases in strength are associated with improvements in important markers of metabolic health,20 everyday tasks,21 a lower risk of injury,22 and enhanced athletic performance.23 Strength training is also important in counteracting conditions associated with muscle weakness, such as sarcopenia, musculoskeletal disorders, and prolonged immobilization.24 Strength training also provides beneficial changes to the risk factors associated with anterior-cruciate ligament injury, which has a high incidence in female athletes injury.25

Findings from studies examining the influence of female sex hormones on strength-related performance have previously been summarized in several non-systematic narrative reviews and book chapters.1, 2, 3, 4, 26 However, these works typically address the effects of female reproductive hormones on athletic performance qualities more broadly and concluded that the effects on muscular strength are equivocal. Consequently, the aim of this study was to systematically review the current body of research that has investigated changes in strength-related variables during different phases of the menstrual cycle in eumenorrheic women, and to conduct a meta-analysis of the data.

Section snippets

Methods

The complete protocol for this study was registered with PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number: CRD42019126598). The guidelines provided by the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group27 were used as the basis for this systematic review. Fig. 1 provides a visual overview of the review and study selection process.

An initial scoping search was carried out in PubMed PubReMiner using the terms ‘strength’ AND ‘menstrual cycle’. The terms selected for the search

Results

The supplementary table provides a summary of the 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 232 participants were included (mean age range: 19–30 years). Four studies used sedentary participants,30, 31, 32, 33 six studies used recreational or active participants,34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 five studies used moderately-trained participants,40, 41, 42, 43, 44 three investigations used well-trained or Collegiate athletes,45, 46, 47 and two studies used highly-trained or elite performers.41

Discussion

The purpose of this systematic review was to collate and evaluate the literature that has investigated the effect of the menstrual cycle on strength-related measures in eumenorrheic women. Based upon the results of 21 studies that met the criteria for inclusion, differences between phases within the menstrual cycle for measures of MVC, IPT and explosive strength are regarded as trivial to small. The assessment of study quality revealed that a number of important features of study design were

Conclusion

Strength-related characteristics appear to remain invariable between menstrual cycle phases, despite fluctuations in concentrations of circulating levels of oestrogen and progesterone. Practically, these findings suggest that eumenorrheic females participating in sports or activities that rely heavily on maximal or explosive strength, are not disadvantaged by their menstrual cycle phase on any given day. Research in this area is immensely challenging due to problems associated with accurate

Practical implications

  • Fluctuations in female sex hormones over the course of the menstrual cycle may explain variations in physical performance.

  • Strength-related qualities are minimally affected by changes in sex hormones over the course of the menstrual cycle.

  • Regularly menstruating females who participate in strength-related exercise activities or strength-dominant sports do not need to adjust for menstrual cycle phase to maximize their performance.

Acknowledgements

The responses to queries received from study authors is greatly appreciated. The authors would like to thank Dr Andrew Simpkin for his advice on the statistical analysis conducted in this report. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors report no conflict of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

References (62)

  • E.A. Dawson et al.

    Menstrual cycle, exercise and health

    Biol Rhythm Res

    (2009)
  • X.A.K.J. de Jonge

    Effects of the menstrual cycle on exercise performance

    Sport Med

    (2003)
  • C.M. Lebrun et al.

    Effects of female reproductive hormones on sports performance

  • M. Haggstrom

    Reference ranges for estradiol, progesterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone during the menstrual cycle

    WikiJournal Med

    (2014)
  • M. Hansen

    Female hormones: do they influence muscle and tendon protein metabolism?

    Proc Nutr Soc

    (2018)
  • B. Stoffel-Wagner

    Neurosteroid metabolism in the human brain

    Eur J Endocrinol

    (2001)
  • K.N. Schultz et al.

    Viral vector-mediated overexpression of estrogen receptor-α in striatum enhances the estradiol-induced motor activity in female rats and estradiol-modulated GABA release

    J Neurosci

    (2009)
  • H. Callachan et al.

    Modulation of the GABAA receptor by progesterone metabolites

    Proc R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci

    (1987)
  • M. Estrada et al.

    Testosterone stimulates intracellular calcium release and mitogen-activated protein kinases via a G protein-coupled receptor in skeletal muscle cells

    Endocrinology

    (2003)
  • H. Franssen et al.

    Nerve conduction and temperature: necessary warming time

    Muscle Nerve

    (1994)
  • J. Oksa et al.

    Cooling-induced changes in muscular performance and EMG activity of agonist

    Aviat Space Environ Med

    (1995)
  • J.E. Goodwin et al.

    The biomechanical principles underpinning strength and conditioning

  • B.S. Shaw et al.

    Resistance exercise is medicine: strength training in health promotion and rehabilitation

    Int J Ther Rehabil

    (2015)
  • J.B. Lauersen et al.

    The effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent sports injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Br J Sport Med

    (2014)
  • L.B. Seitz et al.

    Increases in lower-body strength transfer positively to sprint performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis

    Sport Med

    (2014)
  • J.P. Folland et al.

    The adaptations to strength training

    Sport Med

    (2007)
  • T.E. Hewett et al.

    Reducing knee and anterior cruciate ligament injuries among female athletes: a systematic review of neuromuscular training interventions

    J Knee Surg

    (2005)
  • M.S. Tenan

    Sex hormone effects on the nervous system and their impact on muscle strength and motor performance in women

  • E.A.T. Ghogomu et al.

    Updated method guidelines for cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews and metaanalyses

    J Rheumatol

    (2014)
  • M. Ouzzani et al.

    Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

    Syst Rev

    (2016)
  • J.R. Stevens et al.

    Hierarchical dependence in meta-analysis

    J Educ Behav Stat

    (2009)
  • Cited by (43)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text