Original research
Reliability and validity of the 30-s continuous jump test for anaerobic fitness evaluation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2013.09.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of the 30-s continuous jump (CJ30) test using the Wingate test as a reference.

Design

Descriptive validity study.

Methods

Twenty-one male volleyball players (23.8 ± 3.8 years; 82.5 ± 9.1 kg; 185 ± 4.7 cm) were tested in three separate sessions. The first and second sessions were used to assess the reliability of the CJ30 while in the third session the Wingate test was performed. In the continuous jump test, consisting of maximal continuous jumps performed for 30 s, jump height was determined by video kinematic analysis. Blood samples were collected after each test to determine lactate concentration.

Results

The CJ30 showed excellent test–retest reliability for the maximal jump height (ICC = 0.94), mean vertical jump height (ICC = 0.98) and fatigue index (ICC = 0.87). Peak lactate showed moderate reliability (ICC = 0.45). Large correlations were found between the mean height of the first four jumps of CJ30 and the peak power of the Wingate (r = 0.57), between the mean vertical jump height of CJ30 and the mean power of the Wingate (r = 0.70) and between the lactate peak of CJ30 and Wingate (r = 0.51). A moderate correlation of fatigue index between CJ30 and the Wingate was found (r = 0.43).

Conclusions

The continuous jump is a reliable test and measures some of the same anaerobic properties as WAnT. The correlations observed in terms of anaerobic indices between the tests provide evidence that the CJ30 may adequately assess anaerobic performance level.

Introduction

Assessment of anaerobic fitness is an important parameter in controlling and monitoring sports training performance. A number of tests have been proposed for evaluating anaerobic metabolism,1, 2, 3 such as the Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT), which is one of the most popular.4 Despite its widespread use, this test does not satisfy the specific demands of sports that do not involve cycling movements.5 In addition, some motor actions involving a combination of eccentric and concentric muscular actions, i.e., the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC), enhance performance during the final phase (concentric action) of movement when compared to the isolated concentric actions6 observed in WAnT. SSC is integral to many human movements including countermovement vertical jumps, which are used frequently in several sports.2, 6

Some tests share little specificity with sports that require vertical jumps,7, 8 e.g., basketball and volleyball. In this context, Bosco et al.2 devised a specific anaerobic power test in which continuous jumps are executed for a period of 60 s. In addition to the test's simplicity, the parameters obtained (e.g., jump height) may be more representative and have more practical application for coaches and athletes in sports that include such demands.5

Continuous jump tests have been extensively used by coaches and physical trainers, but insufficient information has been presented in the literature2, 5 concerning their validity and reliability. Bosco et al.2 and Sands et al.5 used only a correlation approach to find evidence for the validity of continuous jump tests applied for 60 s. Additionally, limited or inadequate information about reliability is available. According to Hopkins et al.,9 the two most important aspects of measurement error are concurrent validity and test–retest reliability, which guarantee the quality of a measuring instrument.

A variation of the traditional Bosco test (60 s) using a shorter duration (i.e., 30 s) has recently been studied.10, 11 The 30 s duration is considered sufficient for eliciting ATP-PC power and capacity, as well as maximal glycolytic power,12 which may contribute more effectively to sustain the subject throughout the entire test.13, 14 In addition to causing severe discomfort, anaerobic tests longer than 45 s tend to overestimate at power output because many individuals do not perform at maximum intensity throughout the test.10, 14, 15 According to Inbar et al.,15 the power generated in a 30-s test was higher than that recorded for the first 30 s in longer tests.

Given that no researchers have reported any information regarding the validity of a shorter continuous jump test (30 s) and the lack of data regarding its reliability in previous studies, this study aimed to determine the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of the continuous jump test performed over 30 s (CJ30), using WAnT as a reference.

Section snippets

Methods

Twenty-one healthy male volleyball athletes (23.8 ± 3.8 years old; 82.5 ± 9.1 kg; 185 ± 4.7 cm; fat percentage: 12.1 ± 3.5%) volunteered to participate in this study. They signed a written informed consent form, which was approved by the Human Research Ethic Committee of the Federal University of Santa Catarina in accordance with the Helsinki convention. Participants trained on a regular basis (three sessions per week) during the three years that preceded the study and were currently competing at the

Results

The number of jumps (26.6 ± 1.9 vs. 26.6 ± 1.8), and the maximum knee (80.2 ± 10.9° vs. 80.5 ± 10.4°) and hip (61.3 ± 12.3° vs. 60.2 ± 9.9°) flexion angles were similar from test to retest sessions, respectively. Table 1 shows the reliability measurements of the CJ30 parameters. HMAX, HMEAN, fatigue index and lactate peak presented ICC ranging from good to excellent. Higher values of TEM (%) were observed for fatigue index and lactate peak when compared to the performance indexes (HMAX and HMEAN).

The

Discussion

The first purpose of this study was to verify the test–retest reliability of a continuous jump test over a shorter duration (30 s). The number of jumps and maximum knee and hip flexion angles were similar in the test and retest session, showing the reliability of the test motor pattern. Considering the intra-class correlation, the CJ30 parameters, HMAX, HMEAN and fatigue index showed excellent reliability (Table 1). However, the fatigue index presented higher typical error (%) when compared to

Conclusion

From our findings it can be concluded that the continuous jump performed for 30 s is a reliable test considering the performance variables (HMAX, HMEAN). Lactate peak and fatigue index are less reliable variables and should be used with care in anaerobic assessment. Considering that the peak blood lactate concentration obtained in the CJ30 was lower than that in the WAnT, there seems to be less demand for glycolytic metabolism in the former. This suggests that the continuous jump and Wingate

Practical implications

  • A 30-s test may be more feasible than other longer tests (e.g., 60-s) as it offers more operational facilities with less discomfort.

  • The continuous jump test seems to be more specific for sports that are acyclic and involve participants experiencing the stretch-shortening cycle in their actions, such as basketball, volleyball, gymnastics, etc., all of which involve similar movement patterns.

  • The use of a simple variable, i.e., jump height, rather than mechanical power has greater practical

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge and thank the volunteer participants for their cooperation and the staff of the Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEC-UFSC) for their technical assistance. No financial support was received for this research.

References (29)

  • P.V. Komi

    Stretch-shortening cycle: a powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle

    J Biomech

    (2000)
  • R. Margaria et al.

    Measurement of muscular power (anaerobic) in man

    J Appl Physiol

    (1966)
  • C. Bosco et al.

    A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping

    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol

    (1983)
  • J.I. Medbo et al.

    Anaerobic capacity determined by maximal accumulated O2 deficit

    J Appl Physiol

    (1988)
  • O. Bar-Or

    The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity

    Sports Med

    (1987)
  • W.A. Sands et al.

    Comparison of the Wingate and Bosco anaerobic tests

    J Strength Cond Res

    (2004)
  • M.D. Tillman et al.

    Jumping and landing techniques in elite women's volleyball

    J Sports Sci Med

    (2004)
  • J.L. Barnes et al.

    Relationship of jumping and agility performance in female volleyball athletes

    J Strength Cond Res

    (2007)
  • W.G. Hopkins et al.

    Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2009)
  • E. Trinkūnas et al.

    Dynamics of muscular performance indices during the 30-s vertical jump test in endurance and sprint cohorts

    Ugdymas: Kūno Kultūra-Sportas

    (2011)
  • J. Dal Pupo et al.

    Stiffness, intralimb coordination, and joint modulation during a continuous vertical jump test

    Sports Biomech

    (2013)
  • J.C. Smith et al.

    Contribution of energy systems during a Wingate power test

    Br J Sports Med

    (1991)
  • R. Dotan

    The Wingate anaerobic test's past and future and the compatibility of mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle-ergometers

    Eur J Appl Physiol

    (2006)
  • P.J. Maud et al.

    Physiological assessment of human fitness

    (2009)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Development of a new fatigability jumping protocol: Effect of the test duration on reproducibility and performance

      2021, Science and Sports
      Citation Excerpt :

      We used jumping height and not mechanical power [16,32] to analyse the reproducibility of the fatigability jumping protocol due to fact that the height of a vertical jump is the most direct and thus finest measure for assessing performance and controlling training effects. Moreover, the jumping height has a more practical utilization and relevance for coaches and athletes than mechanical power [1]. A key point in the process of determining the optimal number of jumps is the aerobic contribution to energy metabolism: up until forty-five seconds, the aerobic contribution is about 37% (± 4%), while if the test lasts sixty seconds, this contribution increases to 45% (± ≈ 5%) [33].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text