Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and antioxidant metabolism differentially in two mungbean cultivars

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.11.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Salicylic acid (SA) is known to affect photosynthesis under normal conditions and induces tolerance in plants to biotic and abiotic stresses through influencing physiological processes. In this study, physiological processes were compared in salt-tolerant (Pusa Vishal) and salt-sensitive (T44) cultivars of mungbean and examined how much these processes were induced by SA treatment to alleviate decrease in photosynthesis under salt stress. Cultivar T44 accumulated higher leaf Na+ and Cl content and exhibited greater oxidative stress than Pusa Vishal. Activity of antioxidant enzymes, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR) was greater in Pusa Vishal than T44. Contrarily, activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) was greater in T44. The greater accumulation of leaf nitrogen and sulfur through higher activity of their assimilating enzymes, nitrate reductase (NR) and ATP-sulfurylase (ATPS) increased reduced glutathione (GSH) content more conspicuously in Pusa Vishal than T44. Application of 0.5 mM SA increased nitrogen and sulfur assimilation, GSH content and activity of APX and GR. This resulted in the increase in photosynthesis under non-saline condition and alleviated the decrease in photosynthesis under salt stress. It also helped in restricting Na+ and Cl content in leaf, and maintaining higher efficiency of PSII, photosynthetic N-use efficiency (NUE) and water relations in Pusa Vishal. However, application of 1.0 mM SA resulted in inhibitory effects. The effect of SA was more pronounced in Pusa Vishal than T44. These results indicate that SA application alleviates the salt-induced decrease in photosynthesis mainly through inducing the activity of NR and ATPS, and increasing antioxidant metabolism to a greater extent in Pusa Vishal than T44.

Introduction

Salt stress is a major abiotic stress that causes detrimental effects on plant growth and productivity mainly through changes at physiological, biochemical and molecular level (Tester and Devenport, 2003, Khan et al., 2009, Syeed et al., 2010). The physiological processes that are primarily adversely affected by salt stress include ion toxicity, osmotic stress, nutrient deficiency and oxidative stress (Flowers, 2004). Salt stress may negatively affect photosynthesis by causing excess accumulation of leaf Na+ and Cl, stomatal closure and oxidative stress resulting in the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Excessive amounts of ROS can enhance membrane lipid peroxidation and electrolyte leakage (Gunes et al., 2007) and damage chloroplast, inhibit photochemical reactions and decrease photosynthesis (Steduto et al., 2000). ROS are toxic by-products of stress metabolism, but also play an important role as important signal transduction molecules in stress signaling and regulation of acclimation responses (Miller et al., 2010). As an adaptation response, plants activate several mechanisms to counteract the adverse effects of salt-induced ROS in plants. These mechanisms include ion homeostasis, detoxification of ROS and the use of available resources which directly influence photosynthesis. One of the defense mechanisms of plants includes the up-regulation of reduced glutathione (GSH), a low molecular weight antioxidant. GSH plays essential roles within plant metabolism and stress tolerance to ROS (Szalai et al., 2009). The potential of GSH as antioxidant is related to the activity of glutathione reductase (GR), which catalyzes the regeneration of GSH from oxidized glutathione (GSSG). Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) are constituents of GSH. Therefore, the activity of nitrate reductase (NR) and ATP-sulfurylase (ATPS), the enzymes involved in N and S assimilation may influence GSH content in plant cell. Plants containing high activities of antioxidant enzymes have shown considerable resistance to oxidative damage caused by ROS (Khan et al., 2007, Gapinska et al., 2008, Frary et al., 2010, Syeed et al., 2010). These mechanisms of ion homeostasis, GSH synthesis and antioxidant enzymes may be influenced by plant growth regulators under salt stress.

Salicylic acid (SA) is a naturally occurring plant hormone, influences various physiological and biochemical functions in plants, acts as an important signaling molecule and has diverse effects on tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress (Arfan et al., 2007, Syeed et al., 2010, Wang et al., 2010). Its role in plant tolerance to abiotic stresses such as ozone, UV-B, heat, heavy metal and osmotic stress (El-Tayeb, 2005, Wang et al., 2010) has been reported. In contrast, it has also been shown that high concentration of SA increases oxidative damage generated by NaCl in Arabidopsis (Borsani et al., 2001) and decreases drought tolerance in Zea mays (Nemeth et al., 2002). These reports show that SA has contrasting effects in inducing stress tolerance that may depend upon the species or concentration of SA applied. Therefore, it is critical to identify the physiological processes of plants differing in salt sensitivity, and examine how much these processes are induced by SA application in tolerant and sensitive types to alleviate the decrease in photosynthesis under salt stress. One of the objectives of the reported research was to compare the physiological processes in Pusa Vishal (salt-tolerant) and T44 (salt-sensitive) cultivars of mungbean. The other objective was to study the effectiveness of SA application in modulating these processes and alleviating decrease in photosynthesis under salt stress. The cultivars, Pusa Vishal and T44 have been shown to differ in sensitivity to salt stress (Khan and Syeed, 2003).

Section snippets

Plant material and growth conditions

Healthy seeds of Pusa Vishal (salt-tolerant) and T44 (salt-sensitive) cultivars of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) were surface sterilized and sown in 15-cm-diameter earthen pots filled with acid-washed sand purified according to Hewitt (1966). Plants grown in pots were kept in a greenhouse under natural day/night conditions with photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) ∼900 ± 28 μmol m−2 s−1 and average day/night temperature of 33/20 ± 2 °C. Plants (2 per pot) were subjected to either 0 (control) or 50 mM

Leaf and root Na+ and Cl content

Salt treatment resulted in higher leaf Na+ and Cl content in comparison to control in both the cultivars, but T44 exhibited greater accumulation than Pusa Vishal. Plants treated with 0.1 or 0.5 mM SA exhibited leaf Na+ and Cl content lesser than the control in both the cultivars. Maximum reduction in the content of leaf Na+ and Cl was noted with 0.5 mM SA in Pusa Vishal. Application of 0.5 mM SA resulted in reduction of leaf Na+ and Cl content by 27.8% and 46.7% in Pusa Vishal and 10.0% and

Discussions

The reported research was undertaken to improve our understanding of physiological processes determining salt sensitivity and the induction of such processes by SA application for the alleviation of salt-induced decreases in photosynthesis. The salt-sensitive cultivar, T44 accumulated higher Na+ and Cl in leaves and therefore, exhibited greater content of H2O2 and TBARS and electrolyte leakage than the salt-tolerant cultivar, Pusa Vishal. To counteract NaCl-induced oxidative stress, plants are

Conclusion

It is concluded that the low sensitivity of Pusa Vishal to salt stress was due to its capacity to accumulate less content of Na+ and Cl in leaf. This cultivar also exhibited lower activity of SOD and higher activity of APX and GR and GSH content. These traits helped to remove salt-induced ROS in this cultivar more efficiently than T44. In contrast, Na+ and Cl accumulation in leaf was higher than root in T44, and this cultivar exhibited higher SOD activity than Pusa Vishal showing greater

References (51)

  • A.K. Parida et al.

    Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review

    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf

    (2005)
  • P. Steduto et al.

    Gas exchange response and stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to carbon assimilation of sunflower under salinity

    Environ Exp Bot

    (2000)
  • A.M.A. Al-Hakimi et al.

    Counteraction of salinity stress on wheat plants by grain soaking in ascorbic acid, thiamin or sodium salicylate

    Biol Plant

    (2001)
  • N.A. Anjum et al.

    Sulphur protects mustard (Brassica campestris L.) from cadmium toxicity by improving leaf ascorbate and glutathione

    Plant Growth Regul

    (2008)
  • M.M. Azooz

    Salt stress mitigation by seed priming with salicylic acid in two faba bean genotypes differing in salt tolerance

    Int J Agric Biol

    (2009)
  • O. Borsani et al.

    Evidence for a role of salicylic acid in the oxidative damage generated by NaCl and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis seedlings

    Plant Physiol

    (2001)
  • L. Chesnin et al.

    Turbidimetric determination of available sulphates

    Soil Sci Soc Am Proc

    (1950)
  • R.H. Dhindsa et al.

    Leaf senescence correlated with increased level of membrane permeability, lipid peroxidation and decreased level of SOD and CAT

    J Exp Bot

    (1981)
  • J. Durner et al.

    Inhibition of ascorbate peroxidase by salicylic acid and 2,6-dichloro-isonicotinic acid, two inducers of plant defense responses

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1995)
  • M.A. El-Tayeb

    Response of barley grains to the interactive effect of salinity and salicylic acid

    Plant Growth Regul

    (2005)
  • T. Flowers

    Improving crop salt tolerance

    J Exp Bot

    (2004)
  • C.H. Foyer et al.

    The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: a proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism

    Planta

    (1976)
  • A. Frary et al.

    Salt tolerance in Solanum pennellii: antioxidant response and related QTL

    BMC Plant Biol

    (2010)
  • M. Gapinska et al.

    Effect of short- and long-term salinity on the activities of antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in tomato roots

    Acta Physiol Plant

    (2008)
  • C.N. Giannopolitis et al.

    Superoxide dismutase. I. Occurrence in higher plants

    Plant Physiol

    (1977)
  • Cited by (447)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text