APSA Paper
Are the long-term results of the transanal pull-through equal to those of the transabdominal pull-through? A comparison of the 2 approaches for Hirschsprung disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.09.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) is becoming the most popular procedure in the treatment of Hirschsprung disease (HD), but overstretching of the anal sphincters remains a critical issue that may impact the continence. This study examined the long-term outcome of TERPT versus conventional transabdominal (ABD) pull-through for HD.

Methods

Records of 41 patients more than 3 years old who underwent a pull-through for HD (TERPT, n = 20; ABD, n = 21) were reviewed, and their families were thoroughly interviewed and scored via a 15-item post–pull-through long-term outcome questionnaire. Patients were operated on between the years 1995 and 2003. During this time, our group transitioned from the ABD to the TERPT technique. Total scoring ranged from 0 to 40: 0 to 10, excellent; 11 to 20 good; 21 to 30 fair; 31 to 40 poor. A 2-tailed Student t test, analysis of covariance, as well as logistic and linear regression were used to analyze the collected data with confidence interval higher than 95%.

Results

Overall scores were similar. However, continence score was significantly better in the ABD group, and the stool pattern score was better in the TERPT group. A significant difference in age at interview between the 2 groups was noted; we therefore reanalyzed the data controlling for age, and this showed that age did not significantly affect the long-term scoring outcome between groups.

Conclusion

Our long-term study showed significantly better (2-fold) results regarding the continence score for the abdominal approach compared with the transanal pull-through. The stool pattern and enterocolitis scores were somewhat better for the TERPT group. These findings raise an important issue about the current surgical management of HD; however, more cases will need to be studied before a definitive conclusion can be drawn.

Section snippets

Methods

From 1995 to 2003, 124 HD cases were treated at the CS Mott's Children Hospital, University of Michigan. The study protocol was fully approved by our hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB approval number: HUM00000592). During that time, our group transitioned from the ABD to the TERPT technique. Patients who underwent other types of pull-throughs (Duhamel or Swenson) (4 cases) were excluded from the study. In patients 3 years of age or older (79/124 cases) in whom continence could readily be

Demographics

Complete evaluation was carried out in 41 HD cases. The descriptive data of all cases are shown in Table 2. There were no statistical differences between the TERPT and ABD groups regarding sex, associated congenital anomalies, family history of HD, type of presentation, and age of pull-through in months. However, there were significant differences regarding the age at interview in years with a mean of 5.75 ± 2.04 in the TERPT group versus 8.47 ± 2.33 in the ABD group (F1,39 = 15.82; P < .001),

Discussion

Since first described in 1998, the TERPT has become widely used because it may not require any intraabdominal or pelvic dissection, potentially obviating laparotomy or laparoscopy [9]. The risks of contamination and adhesion formation are eliminated. The procedure does not damage the pelvic structures, is not expensive, and has the most optimal cosmetic results [10], [11], [12]. To our knowledge, until now there have been no published reports addressing the long-term functional outcome of the

References (26)

  • D.H. Teitelbaum et al.

    Primary pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease

    Semin Neonatol

    (2003)
  • T.L. Marty et al.

    Gastrointestinal function after surgical correction of Hirschsprung's disease: long-term follow-up in 135 patients

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1995)
  • F.J. Rescorla et al.

    Hirschsprung's disease. Evaluation of mortality and long-term function in 260 cases

    Arch Surg

    (1992)
  • Cited by (92)

    • Long-term results of the Duhamel technique are superior to those of the transanal pullthrough: A study of fecal continence and quality of life

      2017, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      A study from the University of Michigan also used a questionnaire to compare the transabdominal approach with the TAPT procedure. No significant difference was observed in the total scores between the groups, although a subgroup analysis could detect that the continence score was 2 times better in the transabdominal approach group compared with that in the TAPT group [21]. In a similar study, Fernandez Ibieta et al. reported a better QoL and lower rates of incontinence in patients submitted to Duhamel procedure in comparison to patients who underwent TAPT technique [22].

    • Laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through (LATP) versus complete transanal pull-through (CTP) in the surgical management of Hirschsprung's disease

      2016, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The difference in surgery duration between the procedures, with CTP taking less time to complete than LATP, likely reduces the use of health resources as well as the occurrence of complications for the patient. On the other hand, increased fecal incontinence following CTP has been reported, probably because of prolonged dilation of the sphincter [33,19]. The risk of colonic torsion may also be higher following CTP [27,34], although we did not have any cases of torsion in our series.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association, May 20–24, 2006, Hilton Head, SC.

    View full text