APSA PaperAre the long-term results of the transanal pull-through equal to those of the transabdominal pull-through? A comparison of the 2 approaches for Hirschsprung disease
Section snippets
Methods
From 1995 to 2003, 124 HD cases were treated at the CS Mott's Children Hospital, University of Michigan. The study protocol was fully approved by our hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB approval number: HUM00000592). During that time, our group transitioned from the ABD to the TERPT technique. Patients who underwent other types of pull-throughs (Duhamel or Swenson) (4 cases) were excluded from the study. In patients 3 years of age or older (79/124 cases) in whom continence could readily be
Demographics
Complete evaluation was carried out in 41 HD cases. The descriptive data of all cases are shown in Table 2. There were no statistical differences between the TERPT and ABD groups regarding sex, associated congenital anomalies, family history of HD, type of presentation, and age of pull-through in months. However, there were significant differences regarding the age at interview in years with a mean of 5.75 ± 2.04 in the TERPT group versus 8.47 ± 2.33 in the ABD group (F1,39 = 15.82; P < .001),
Discussion
Since first described in 1998, the TERPT has become widely used because it may not require any intraabdominal or pelvic dissection, potentially obviating laparotomy or laparoscopy [9]. The risks of contamination and adhesion formation are eliminated. The procedure does not damage the pelvic structures, is not expensive, and has the most optimal cosmetic results [10], [11], [12]. To our knowledge, until now there have been no published reports addressing the long-term functional outcome of the
References (26)
- et al.
Staged pull-through for rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's disease is not safer than primary pull-through
J Pediatr Surg
(1997) - et al.
Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease
J Pediatr Surg
(1998) - et al.
Perineal one-stage pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease
J Pediatr Surg
(1999) - et al.
Transanal versus open endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease
J Pediatr Surg
(2000) - et al.
Transanal one-stage endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: a multicenter study
J Pediatr Surg
(2004) - et al.
One-stage Soave pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: a comparison of the transanal and open approaches
J Pediatr Surg
(2000) - et al.
Stooling and manometric findings after primary pull-throughs in Hirschsprung's disease: perineal versus abdominal approaches
J Pediatr Surg
(2002) - et al.
Clinical outcome in children after transanal 1-stage endorectal pull-through operation for Hirschsprung disease
J Pediatr Surg
(2005) - et al.
Enterocolitis associated with Hirschsprung's disease: a clinical-radiological characterization based on 168 patients
J Pediatr Surg
(1995) - et al.
Enterocolitis
Semin Pediatr Surg
(1998)
Primary pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease
Semin Neonatol
Gastrointestinal function after surgical correction of Hirschsprung's disease: long-term follow-up in 135 patients
J Pediatr Surg
Hirschsprung's disease. Evaluation of mortality and long-term function in 260 cases
Arch Surg
Cited by (92)
Medium-Term Outcomes of Antegrade Continent Enema (ACE): Cairo University Specialized Pediatric Hospital (CUSPH) Experience
2023, Journal of Pediatric SurgeryHistopathological perspective of the pulled-through colon in Hirschsprung disease: Impact on clinical outcome
2020, Journal of Pediatric SurgeryAntegrade continence enemas improve quality of life in patients with medically-refractory encopresis
2017, Journal of Pediatric SurgeryLong-term results of the Duhamel technique are superior to those of the transanal pullthrough: A study of fecal continence and quality of life
2017, Journal of Pediatric SurgeryCitation Excerpt :A study from the University of Michigan also used a questionnaire to compare the transabdominal approach with the TAPT procedure. No significant difference was observed in the total scores between the groups, although a subgroup analysis could detect that the continence score was 2 times better in the transabdominal approach group compared with that in the TAPT group [21]. In a similar study, Fernandez Ibieta et al. reported a better QoL and lower rates of incontinence in patients submitted to Duhamel procedure in comparison to patients who underwent TAPT technique [22].
Laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through (LATP) versus complete transanal pull-through (CTP) in the surgical management of Hirschsprung's disease
2016, Journal of Pediatric SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The difference in surgery duration between the procedures, with CTP taking less time to complete than LATP, likely reduces the use of health resources as well as the occurrence of complications for the patient. On the other hand, increased fecal incontinence following CTP has been reported, probably because of prolonged dilation of the sphincter [33,19]. The risk of colonic torsion may also be higher following CTP [27,34], although we did not have any cases of torsion in our series.
Presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association, May 20–24, 2006, Hilton Head, SC.