Analytical control of process impurities in Pazopanib hydrochloride by impurity fate mapping

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2010.01.043Get rights and content

Abstract

Understanding the origin and fate of organic impurities within the manufacturing process along with a good control strategy is an integral part of the quality control of drug substance. Following the underlying principles of quality by design (QbD), a systematic approach to analytical control of process impurities by impurity fate mapping (IFM) has been developed and applied to the investigation and control of impurities in the manufacturing process of Pazopanib hydrochloride, an anticancer drug approved recently by the U.S. FDA. This approach requires an aggressive chemical and analytical search for potential impurities in the starting materials, intermediates and drug substance, and experimental studies to track their fate through the manufacturing process in order to understand the process capability for rejecting such impurities. Comprehensive IFM can provide elements of control strategies for impurities. This paper highlights the critical roles that analytical sciences play in the IFM process and impurity control. The application of various analytical techniques (HPLC, LC–MS, NMR, etc.) and development of sensitive and selective methods for impurity detection, identification, separation and quantification are highlighted with illustrative examples. As an essential part of the entire control strategy for Pazopanib hydrochloride, analytical control of impurities with ‘meaningful’ specifications and the ‘right’ analytical methods is addressed. In particular, IFM provides scientific justification that can allow for control of process impurities up-stream at the starting materials or intermediates whenever possible.

Introduction

Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are manufactured by scale-up of synthetic chemical processes. Development of synthetic chemical process can lead to the generation of unwanted organic impurities. These usually include the un-reacted starting materials (SMs), impurities originating from the SMs, un-reacted intermediates (IMs), reaction by-products, and degradation products [1], [2], [3]. These undesired impurities usually provide no benefit to patients and can pose risks to patient safety or drug efficacy [4], [5]. Thus, the detection, identification, quantification, and control of such impurities originating in the manufacturing process have become an important element of drug development in order to ensure product quality and ultimately patient safety [6], [7], [8]. Regulatory agencies also explicitly regulate the control criteria for these drug related substances in APIs and subsequent drug products by providing guidance for the pharmaceutical industry [1], [9].

In the traditional framework, product quality is ensured predominantly by restricting flexibility in the manufacturing process and end product testing (so called quality-by-testing, QbT) [10]. Under QbT, process impurities are usually tested against specifications set using the observed data from a number of batches. However, this places little or no emphasis on the process understanding and the design of an effective and efficient impurity control strategy. In light of the recent quality by design (QbD) initiative by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [11], increasing attention has been drawn to the application of the QbD principles [12], [13] to impurity investigation and control, emphasizing process understanding based on sound science and risk management [10], [14], [15]. Under the new QbD paradigm, impurities should not only be tested in the final API, but rather be proactively controlled in the manufacturing process. By developing a product with this goal in mind, end product testing would be solely used for the confirmation of product quality since the process understanding and/or process control provides sufficient evidence that batches will meet the specification if tested [10]. However, only a handful of discussions with regard to a systematic approach to the investigation and control of process impurities have been made available over the past few years [7], [8], [16], [17], [18]. Particularly, the development of a comprehensive QbD approach to impurity investigation in order to actively seek out drug quality is not widely discussed in the literature.

A comprehensive and systematic approach to analytical control of process impurities by impurity fate mapping (IFM) is reported in this paper. This approach is taken to actively search for possible impurities in an API process, obtain intrinsic knowledge of the origin, formation pathway, fate, and process purgeability of impurities, design risk mitigation steps to reduce those impurities during reactions, and finally derive a comprehensive and scientifically justified control strategy for the overall process [19], [20]. A general outline of such an IFM framework is provided in Fig. 1, which is a joint effort from a cross-functional team involving analytical scientists, synthetic chemists, and process engineers. This report highlights the analytical perspective of the IFM process.

To successfully support IFM activities, the application of various complementary analytical techniques for impurity detection, structural identification, separation/isolation, and quantification are essential [21]. For instance, liquid chromatography (LC) with UV detection is an essential tool for separation and determination of impurities in drugs [2], [22] which is backed up with gas chromatography (GC) when impurities are not amenable to LC, whereas the orthogonal techniques, LC–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and GC–MS are universal tools for impurity tracking and identification [23], [24], [25]. When definitive structures are required, isolation by preparative chromatography followed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) analyses is a powerful technique for characterization of impurity structures [6], [21]. The use of these orthogonal techniques as appropriate helps to maximize the impurities that can be detected and the structures that can be confirmed. Typically IFM commences at the late development stage when the final route of synthesis and an optimal process are finalized where a comprehensive impurity control strategy is needed. This means that analytical methods used for impurity testing at the early development stage may not be suitable for IFM, because of changes in impurity profiles caused by changes in the synthetic route from early to late development stages as well as the greater number of impurities identified through IFM itself. Therefore, evolution of analytical methods becomes a key aspect of IFM, which can pose significant challenges to the analytical method development. Furthermore, analytical control strategy of process impurities can be derived based on the knowledge gained throughout the IFM. As part of the overall control strategy (including the effective and efficient control of quality process parameters and analytical control of impurities), the analytical control is usually comprised of three key aspects as shown in Fig. 1: (1) designation of specified impurities, (2) setting of scientifically justified specifications, where IFM can make significant contributions, and (3) development of simple, robust and rugged analytical control methods for use over the product lifecycle.

By emphasizing process understanding and risk management, the IFM approach outlined in Fig. 1 has been successfully applied to the understanding and control of process impurities in Pazopanib hydrochloride (GW786034B in Scheme 1), a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved recently by the U.S. FDA for treatment of renal cell carcinoma [26]. The work presented in this paper illustrates how QbD concepts are applied to the analytical control of process impurities in API. The analytical support to the IFM of Pazopanib hydrochloride and analytical challenges encountered during this process are addressed in this article.

Section snippets

Materials

Drug substances, intermediates, and impurities were synthesized or isolated by preparative chromatography in house at GlaxoSmithKline. The starting materials (SMs) were obtained from various vendors: three vendors V1a, V1b and V1c for SM1; two vendors V2a and V2b for SM2; and three vendors V3a, V3b and V3c for SM3. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), formic acid, ammonium acetate, and HPLC grade acetonitrile were all from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). De-ionized water was obtained from a Milli-Q

Process evaluation

A thorough process evaluation was first conducted at the beginning of the IFM of Pazopanib hydrochloride. This assessment was used to provide initial input of known and potential impurities that may be generated in the process, and help the planning of further experiments. This was mainly a paper exercise including an analytical evaluation and a chemistry assessment. Close collaboration between the two disciplines is essential to the initiation of the IFM.

The purpose of the analytical

Conclusion

A comprehensive approach to analytical control of process impurities by IFM has been established and successfully applied to the understanding and control of impurities in the manufacturing process of Pazopanib hydrochloride. The ultimate goal of IFM is to design a comprehensive impurity control strategy to ensure that product quality (impurity levels in this case) is built into the manufacturing process. This approach aligns well with the FDA's QbD initiative by emphasizing process

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. Sarah Chen, Li Liu, Alan Freyer, Mingjiang Sun, Hyunjung Kim, and Fred Vogt, and Mr. Sheng Tang, Mr. Jack Dougherty, and Mr. Lin Bai of Chemical Development, GlaxoSmithKline, for their contributions to the experiments and discussions described in this paper. The authors are grateful to Drs. Ted Chen, Tom Roper, and Chris Brook of Chemical Development, GlaxoSmithKline, for their support of this work.

References (31)

Cited by (21)

  • Process development and integration by mathematical modeling and simulation tools

    2022, Integration and Optimization of Unit Operations: Review of Unit Operations from R&D to Production: Impacts of Upstream and Downstream Process Decisions
  • Supercritical fluid chromatography-photodiode array detection-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry as a framework for impurity fate mapping in the development and manufacture of drug substances

    2018, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Each impurity can be effectively controlled by investigating its formation, downstream fate, and the point in the process where it is removed or purged. A common method known as “spike and purge testing,” “fate and purge” or “impurity fate mapping” is applied to monitor the purging capability of a robust synthetic route and to track the fate of the impurities through the manufacturing process [4–6]. It is important to point out that although ICHQ11 requires an overall understanding of the formation, fate, and purge of impurities; there are no specific regulatory requirements for demonstrating successful impurity fate and purge analysis with respect to identity, mass balance and/or percent recovery of spiked impurities and their downstream analogues.

  • Forced degradation and impurity profiling: Recent trends in analytical perspectives

    2013, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
    Citation Excerpt :

    Impurity fate mapping (IFM) approach (Fig. 5) was applied for investigation and control of impurities in the manufacturing process of pazopanib hydrochloride, which requires an aggressive chemical and analytical search for potential impurities in the starting materials, intermediates and drug substance, and experimental studies to track their fate through the manufacturing process in order to understand the process capability for rejecting such impurities. Comprehensive IFM provide elements of control strategies for impurities [95]. The regression coefficient plots of resolution between peak pairs were included in the experimental design to optimize separation of oxytocin and its related substances [117].

  • Development of quality-by-design analytical methods

    2011, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    The RTRT approach extends the more established approach of parametric release, which uses real-time process data to support release in cases where a particular analytical measurable is difficult to obtain from end-product analysis, such as the use of a surrogate measure for a terminal sterilization procedure on a packaged product to obviate the need for microbial end-product testing.28 At-line and off-line analytical methods have also been employed in QbD impurity fate mapping (IFM) studies of genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemical impurities, a process by which the ability of a process to purge chemical impurities is fully understood through spiking studies.,19–21 Beyond individual analytical methods and results, combinations of methods also play a critical role in providing input for more detailed multivariate modeling of complex pharmaceutical processes, where multiple analytical measurements are combined to build process understanding and achieve control.29 Analytical measurements that range from raw material chemical and physical properties to intermediate granule density measurements to imaging analysis of final products can be combined using multivariate approaches to model the design space for a pharmaceutical process.

  • Computers in Pharmaceutical Analysis

    2022, Computer Aided Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery: an Application Guide for Students and Researchers of Pharmaceutical Sciences
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text