ReviewRopivacaine versus lidocaine infiltration for postpartum perineal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction
Perineal trauma is a frequent complication that impacts a large proportion of women, particularly primiparas, during vaginal childbirth [1,2]. It can take place secondary to spontaneous natural tear, iatrogenic episiotomy, or both [1,2]. It is most often associated with intense pain that warrants immediate and sufficient nociceptive pain relief [3].
A wide array of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic practices exist in place to relieve postpartum perineal pain, for example, perineal massage [4], cold packs [5], and application of local/topical anesthetics [6,7]. The most frequently utilized practice to palliate postpartum perineal pain is injection of a local anesthetic. It functionally blocks the transmission of nociceptive pain signals from the site of injection, thus culminating in loss of pain perception at the perineal region [7].
Lidocaine infiltration, with presence or absence of epidural anesthesia, is the most frequently employed local anesthetic in ameliorating postpartum perineal pain [8]. It is a rapid-onset amide local anesthetic with a short duration of action lasting up to two hours. Conversely, ropivacaine is a closely similar amide local anesthetic with a prolonged duration of action lasting up to 12 h [[8], [9], [10], [11], [12]]. Thus, ropivacaine is anticipated to produce long-lasting effects with satisfactory pain control outcomes.
Local infiltration with ropivacaine demonstrated superiority to saline placebo in patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy [13]. Similar results were obtained among patients who underwent tonsillectomy under local anesthesia [14]. A handful of studies explored the utility of local infiltration with ropivacaine versus lidocaine in patients with postpartum perineal pain [8,[15], [16], [17], [18]]. However, the results were not conclusive and limited by sample size. Accordingly, the clinical usefulness of ropivacaine in relieving perineal pain remains a debatable question.
Thus, the purpose of this review is to systematically and meta-analytically pool all the available evidence from studies which scrutinized the efficacy of local infiltration of ropivacaine in controlling postpartum perineal pain post vaginal childbirth.
Section snippets
Study protocol
We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [19] and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) [20] guidelines.
Literature search strategy
We searched four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) from inception to September 20th, 2020. There was no restriction on language. The following specific search strategy was used in all databases: ropivacaine AND pain AND perineal
Literature search results and summary of included studies
Literature search generated a total of 17 studies after omission of duplicated ones. After title and abstract screening, 9 studies were excluded and the remaining 8 studies advanced to full-text screening for eligibility. Finally, a total 4 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis [8,[16], [17], [18]]. Fig. 1 displays the PRIMSA flowchart. Overall, this meta-analysis included 405 patients; 205 and 200 patients received lidocaine and
Summary of findings
This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis that pooled the efficacy of ropivacaine versus lidocaine local infiltration during repair of perineal trauma after vaginal childbirth. We included all existing relevant studies (randomized, n = 3 and nonrandomized, n = 1) to adequately power the conclusions. Overall, the included studies were of unclear risk and included a total of 405 patients (200 and 205 patients received ropivacaine and lidocaine, respectively). Our results showed that
Conclusions
When compared to lidocaine infiltration, this systematic review and meta-analysis advocates that during repair of postpartum perineal trauma, pain efficacy is relatively longer with ropivacaine but safety is not well investigated.
Funding
The authors received no funding from an external source.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References (31)
- et al.
Techniques to reduce perineal pain during spontaneous vaginal delivery and perineal suturing: a UK survey of midwifery practice
Midwifery
(2005) - et al.
The effects of cryotherapy on perineal pain after childbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Midwifery
(2020) - et al.
Perineal infiltration with lidocaine 1%, ropivacaine 0.75%, or placebo for episiotomy repair in parturients who received epidural labor analgesia: a double-blind randomized study
Int J Obstet Anesth
(2010) - et al.
[Postpartum perineal pain: effectiveness of local ropivacaine infiltration]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)
(2009) - et al.
Lidocaine versus ropivacaine for perineal infiltration post-episiotomy
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
(2013) - et al.
Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state
Br J Anaesth
(2017) - et al.
National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom
Int Urogynecol J
(2014) - et al.
Perineal tears - a review
Aust J Gen Pract
(2018) - et al.
Antenatal perineal massage benefits in reducing perineal trauma and postpartum morbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Int Urogynecol J
(2020) - et al.
Topically applied anaesthetics for treating perineal pain after childbirth
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2005)