Elsevier

Journal of Endodontics

Volume 43, Issue 11, November 2017, Pages 1878-1884
Journal of Endodontics

Basic Research
Cleaning and Shaping Oval Canals with 3 Instrumentation Systems: A Correlative Micro–computed Tomographic and Histologic Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.032Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The mean unprepared apical areas ranged from 10% (SAF) to 18% (XP-endo Shaper).

  • SAF exhibited less unprepared areas than XP-endo Shaper in the apical canal.

  • In the full canal length, the amount of prepared walls was similar for the 3 systems.

  • The 3 instrument systems displayed similar behavior in terms of cleaning.

Abstract

Introduction

The present study evaluated the cleaning and shaping ability of 3 instrumentation systems in oval canals of extracted vital teeth using a correlative analytic approach.

Methods

Oval distal canals from 33 freshly extracted mandibular molars with pulp vitality were scanned by micro–computed tomographic (micro-CT) imaging for sample selection. Specimens matched by anatomic similarities were distributed into 3 experimental groups according to the instrument system to be evaluated: the Self-Adjusting File (SAF; ReDentNOVA, Ra'anana, Israel), TRUShape (Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, OK), and XP-endo Shaper (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland). The irrigant was 5.25% sodium hypochlorite heated at 37°C. After rescanning with micro-CT imaging, the unprepared surface areas were identified, measured, and then histologically evaluated for the amount of pulp remnants in each root third.

Results

When the apical 4-mm canal segment was evaluated, the SAF exhibited significantly less unprepared areas than the XP-endo Shaper (P < .05), and there were no significant differences for the other comparisons (P > .05). Analysis of the full canal length showed no statistically significant differences between the 3 tested systems (P > .05). Likewise, the tested systems did not differ significantly in cleaning the unprepared walls (P > .05).

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in the amount of unprepared surface areas between the 3 instrument systems, except for the comparison between the SAF and XP-endo Shaper in the apical 4-mm segment. None of them prepared 100% of the root canal walls. The cleaning ability of the 3 systems was similar.

Section snippets

Specimen Selection and Preparation

The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee of human research. Thirty-three vital human mandibular molars freshly extracted for reasons not related to this study were selected. Immediately after extraction, teeth were stored in 10% buffered neutral formalin. Pulp vitality was confirmed by the presence of bulk soft tissue in the pulp chamber after access preparation and later by histologic analysis. The inclusion criteria considered only distal roots with a single canal

Micro-CT Imaging

There were no significant differences between groups for specimen length, canal volume, and canal surface area before preparation (P > .05). The mean specimen lengths for the SAF, X-endo Shaper, and TruShape groups were 11.1 mm, 10.6 mm, and 10.3 mm, respectively. The volume and surface area of the distal root canals were significantly increased after instrumentation with the 3 systems (P < .01). There were no significant differences between groups (P > .05).

In the apical 4-mm segment, the mean

Discussion

This study used an innovative correlative micro-CT/histologic approach to evaluate the cleaning and shaping ability of 3 instrument systems in oval distal canals of vital mandibular molars. The 3 systems have been specially devised to reach larger extensions of the canal walls and perform better in anatomically complex canals than conventional instruments. The present findings showed that the mean amount of areas that remained untouched by the 3 instrument systems ranged from 9.85%–17.77% in

Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brazilian Governmental Institutions.

The authors thank FKG Dentaire for providing the XP-endo Shaper instruments and ReDentNOVA for providing the SAF instruments and EndoStation equipment.

The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.

References (26)

Cited by (93)

  • Influence of pecking frequency at working length on the volume of apically extruded debris: A micro-computed tomography analysis

    2022, Journal of Dental Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Reciproc Blue (RB) and WaveOne Gold (WOG) are two popular single-file systems working with reciprocating motion.7 Recently introduced XP-endo Shaper (XPS) is specifically designed to overcome the challenge of irregular root canals, including oval-shaped canals.12,13 To date, the debris extruded by them in oval-shaped and curved canals remains unclear.

  • Novel laser activated photoacoustic streaming for removing pulp remnants from round root canals after single file reciprocating instrumentation

    2022, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Additionally, after single-file instrumentation, approximately 18% of untouched intracanal areas are left in premolars, of which 10% are in the apical region [3]. To enhance the disinfection these regions, new instruments that adapt to complex intracanal anatomy and improved activated irrigation techniques have been developed and evaluated [8,27,28]. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a new Er:YAG laser activated irrigation technique, the SWEEPS protocol, for the removal of the pulp tissue from round canals of premolars after single-file reciprocating instrumentation.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text