Review
Skull base chondrosarcoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.10.029Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We present two illustrative cases of intracranial chondrosarcoma.

  • We review the literature regarding skull base chondrosarcomas with summaries.

  • We advocate maximal safe resection, plus radiotherapy for grade II and III tumours.

Abstract

Intracranial chondrosarcoma are rare tumours, accounting for approximately one in 1000 intracranial neoplasms. Although more common in the axial or appendicular skeleton, intracranial tumours present a challenging surgical and oncological problem. Chondrosarcoma have a predilection for the skull base and although commonly slow growing, Grade II and III lesions do occur. We present two illustrative patients from the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia, demonstrating dramatically differing presentation and clinical outcome and the diagnostic difficulties that may arise. A review of the literature regarding skull base chondrosarcoma is presented. We summarise the clinical, radiological and histological features. The evidence for surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy is presented and critically evaluated. Based on the available evidence, we advocate maximal safe resection, followed by radiotherapy for Grade II and III tumours. There is no current role for chemotherapy. Radical excision should not be attempted at the expense of neurological function.

Introduction

Chondrosarcomas are rare malignant tumours composed of cells derived from transformed chondrocytes and account for approximately 20% of skeletal system cancers [1]. They are a heterogeneous group of tumours that have diverse morphological features and clinical behavior. They commonly occur within the pelvis and shoulder or along the superior metaphysial and diaphysial areas of the appendicular skeleton. Only 2% of all chondrosarcomas occur within the skull base [2], accounting for 0.1–0.2% of all intracranial tumours [3]. They are generally very slow growing and erode the bones of the skull base; however higher grade tumours occur, characterised by rapid growth and early metastasis.

Section snippets

Patient 1

J.E. is a 68-year-old woman who presented with headaches over a period of 12 months. The headaches were not consistent with any particular pattern and were not suggestive of raised intracranial pressure. Neurological examination was normal. Neuroimaging revealed a contrast-enhancing lesion eroding through the petrous bone into the cerebellopontine angle (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3). A retrosigmoid craniotomy was performed with the intracranial component being resected and a significant amount of the

Epidemiology/presentation

Skull base chondrosarcoma occurs most commonly between the ages of 40 and 70 years. There may be a slight female predominance (1.1:1 female:male [4]) although many studies demonstrate no sex difference. Presenting symptoms vary according to the precise location of the lesion and the compression and/or displacement of surrounding structures. Symptoms generally include headaches, diplopia, hearing reduction and/or tinnitus, facial sensory disturbances and gait abnormalities. Cranial nerve deficits

Prognosis and treatment

It is important to distinguish chordomas from chondrosarcomas in the skull base as both have similar appearances and radiological characteristics; however, chondrosarcomas carry a much better prognosis. They cannot however be reliably differentiated on the basis of neuroimaging alone. Rosenberg discusses 200 patients with skull base chondrosarcoma of which 74 (37%) were initially referred with a pre-operative diagnosis of chordoma [2].

Bloch and colleagues stated that prognosis is based

Summary

Skull base chondrosarcomas are relatively rare, and it is recommended that treatment occur in specialised centres. Treatment is also best undertaken in a multidisciplinary setting with skull base neurosurgeons and neuro-oncologists. Chondrosarcomas are indolent but invasive tumours that can be at best difficult to treat in view of their location and often extensive nature at the time of diagnosis. Given the available literature and slow growth of most chondrosarcomas, we would argue that whilst

Conflicts of Interest/Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no financial or other conflicts of interest in relation to this research and its publication.

References (26)

  • A.G. Korten et al.

    Intracranial chondrosarcoma: review of the literature and report of 15 cases

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1998)
  • L. Arpino et al.

    Parasellar myxoid chondrosarcoma: a rare variant of cranial chondrosarcoma

    J Neurosurg Sci

    (2011)
  • M. Hassounah et al.

    Primary cranial and intracranial chondrosarcoma. A survey

    Acta Neurochir (Wien)

    (1985)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Radiomic analysis of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma

      2019, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, skull base surgery is highly challenging owing to the inaccessibility of the tumors and their close proximity to vital structures such as the brainstem, cranial nerves, and major vessels. Therefore, some studies have suggested that maximal safe surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy may result in a relatively good prognosis for chondrosarcoma of the skull base [6,7]. For chordoma, owing to its high recurrence rate [8], gross total resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is advocated to achieve better long-term survival [9].

    • Imaging of the Craniocervical Junction: A Pictorial Review

      2023, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text