Elsevier

Journal of Nuclear Materials

Volume 495, November 2017, Pages 67-77
Journal of Nuclear Materials

Assessment of empirical potential for MOX nuclear fuels and thermomechanical properties

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.07.067Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Assessment of five empirical interatomic potentials for (U,Pu)O2.

  • Comparison of the structural, thermodynamics, and mechanical properties.

  • Studying crack propagation behaviour.

  • Best results are obtained for the Cooper and Potashnikov potentials.

Abstract

We assess five empirical interatomic potentials in the approximation of rigid ions and pair interactions for the (U1−y,Puy)O solid solution. The assessment compares available experimental data and Fink's recommendation with simulations on: the structural, thermodynamics, and mechanical properties over the full range of plutonium composition, from pure UO2 to pure PuO2 and for temperatures ranging from 300 K to the melting point. The best results are obtained by potentials referred as Cooper and Potashnikov potentials. The first one reproduces more accurately recommendations for the thermodynamics and mechanical properties exhibiting ductile-like behaviour during crack propagation, while the second one gives brittle behaviour at low temperature.

Introduction

Nowadays, uranium dioxide (UO2) is being used as the standard nuclear fuel in fission nuclear reactors and has been extensively studied since the sixties. In parallel, nuclear fuel containing a mixture of uranium and plutonium oxides (MOX) as principle components provides an alternative, due to the fact that: (1) it allows large quantities of fissile isotopes produced in spent nuclear fuel from light water reactors to be recycled, (2) it can be seen as a more efficiently way of using the uranium dioxide, since the abundant 238U found in natural uranium is a Pu producer, (3) it can be taken as a solution for the increasing stockpile of Pu around the globe coming from either nuclear weapons and commercial reactors, and (4) it is designated as the most probable fuel for future fast breeder reactors, such as ASTRID (Advanced Sodium Technological Reactor for Industrial Demonstration).

A very important issue for the future of nuclear power is to ensure safeness and effectiveness during processes involving MOX fuel such as fabrication, operation and recycling. Yet, the toxicity of plutonium and high radiation levels make experiments less viable. Nonetheless, beside previous experimental efforts gathered in the following reviews [1], [2], experiments with MOX are difficult to perform, especially at high temperatures and under irradiation condition. For these reasons, numerical approaches can be chosen to bring some insight on basic physical phenomena that take place in the fuel matrix. For instance, over the last decade, several atomistic approaches using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been carried out to study thermal conductivity properties in (U,Pu)O2 [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. However, the reliability of the results depends exclusively on the choice of the set of potentials. The potential parameters are usually fitted to reproduce a few physical properties, typically the lattice parameter, the cohesive energy, and complementary the elastic constants, which comes from experimental values or if not available from ab initio calculations. Therefore, each potential has its domain of validity. Subsequently, others physical properties for which the set of parameters are not been fitted need to be assessed to provide a good insight of advantages and disadvantages of each potential and their range of validity. This type of study has already been carried out in the case of UO2 [13], [14], [15], [16] but, to our knowledge, not yet for MOX. Therefore, in this study, we assess available rigid ion model empirical potentials for MOX on the structural, thermodynamics, and mechanical properties. The assessment is performed over the full range of plutonium composition, from pure UO2 to pure PuO2 and for temperatures ranging from 300 K to melting point.

With MD method, actinide atoms are usually simulated in the approximation of rigid ions and pair interactions. For the mixed oxide compound (U,Pu)O2, several interatomic potentials are available in the literature. There exists two main families of potentials. One that considers U and Pu cations as one single entity and hence they include only three set of parameters (A-A, A-O, and O-O) but depends on the relative percentage of Pu in the MOX [17]. The second one treats explicitly the U and Pu cations. Therefore, they include six set of parameters (U-U, U-Pu, Pu-Pu, U-O, Pu-O, and O-O) and do not depend on the percentage of Pu. Because we are interested in studying the spatial repartition of both cation and anion sublattices, we will only consider and describe the second type of force field.

Five rigid ion model potentials have been found in the literature and are tested herein. They will be coined by the name of the first author: Yamada [3], Arima [6], Potashnikov [15], Tiwary [18], and Cooper [19], [20]. We will present first the method used, then we will discuss the results obtained for the lattice parameter, the thermal expansion, the specific heat capacity, the elastic constants, the stress-strain curves under uniaxial deformation, and crack propagation.

Section snippets

Computational method

These five force fields can be separated according the properties on which they have been fitted. All potentials have been fitted to reproduce correctly the thermal expansion up to the maximum temperature available by experiments at the time, which is about 2100 K. Historically, Yamada was the first one followed by Arima and Potashnikov with some improvement at high temperature, up to the melting point. Tiwary potential includes also fits on the formation energy of point defects (Frenkel

Lattice parameter

The first structural property to fit is the evolution of the lattice parameter with the temperature. Therefore, all the interatomic potentials studied should fit more or less the experimental results. However, Yamada and Arima fitted their potential only up to 2100 K, whereas Potashnikov and Cooper fitted their potential with values up to 2900 K. It is worth to mention that experimental data are really sensitive to the O/U ratio hence we keep our comparison with the strict stoichiometric

Conclusions

In this paper, we assess empirical potentials for the (U1−y,Puy)O2 solid solution. To date, only empirical potentials using rigid ion model are available. Since we are interested in studying for our future study on the mechanical behaviour under irradiation the point defects distribution, both cations need to be explicitly modeled. Therefore, we found in the literature five interatomic potentials fulfilling these requirements coined by the name for their first author: Yamada, Arima,

Acknowledgements

This work was granted access to the HPC resources of [TGCC] under the allocation 2016-mtt7073 made by GENCI. This research contributes to the joint programme on nuclear materials (JPNM) of the European energy research alliance (EERA).

References (52)

  • K. Govers et al.

    Comparison of interatomic potentials for UO2. Part I: static calculations

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (2007)
  • K. Govers et al.

    Comparison of interatomic potentials for UO2. Part II: molecular dynamics simulations

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (2008)
  • S.I. Potashnikov et al.

    High-precision molecular dynamics simulation of UO2-PuO2: pair potentials comparison in UO2

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (2011)
  • M.W.D. Cooper et al.

    Thermophysical properties and oxygen transport in the (Ux,Pu1−x)O2 lattice

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (2015)
  • R.C. Belin et al.

    In situ high temperature X-Ray diffraction study of the phase equilibria in the UO2-PuO2-Pu2O3 system

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (2015)
  • T. Yamashita et al.

    Thermal expansions of NpO2 and some other actinide dioxides

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (1997)
  • E.R. Gardner et al.

    The plutonium-oxygen phase diagram

    J. Inorg. Nuc. J. Chem.

    (1965)
  • T. Uchida et al.

    Thermal expansion of PuO2

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (2014)
  • C. Ronchi et al.

    Analysis of recent measurements of the heat capacity of uranium dioxide

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (1994)
  • A. Lunev et al.

    A classical molecular dynamics study of the correlation between the Bredig transition and thermal conductivity of stoichiometric uranium dioxide

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (2011)
  • R. Böhler et al.

    Recent advances in the study of the UO2-PuO2 phase diagram at high temperatures

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (2014)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Crack tip plasticity in single crystal UO2: atomistic simulations

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (2012)
  • T.G. Desai et al.

    Stress-induced phase transformation in nanocrystalline UO2

    Scr. Mater.

    (2009)
  • J.T.A. Roberts et al.

    Nature of brittle-to-ductile transition in UO2-20 wt% PuO2 nuclear fuel

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (1971)
  • J.T.A. Roberts

    Brittle fracture of oxide nuclear fuel

    J. Nucl. Mater

    (1973)
  • S. Popov

    Thermophysical Properties of MOX and UO2 Fuels Including the Effects of Irradiation

    (2000)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Thorium fuel revisited

      2023, Progress in Nuclear Energy
    • State of the art of fuel micro-mechanical modelling: From atomic scale to engineering laws in fuel performance codes

      2022, Journal of Nuclear Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      During these simulations, the stress-strain curves are calculated and the time evolution of the structural configuration are recorded to follow crack initiation and propagation. However, Balboa et al. [16] show in (U,Pu)O2 solid solution that this crack propagation behavior is greatly dependent on the empirical potential used. In their simulations they assessed three empirical potentials and observed that for one of them, crack under tensile loading along the [111] crystallographic direction propagates simply with a cleavage-like behavior; it opens straight with steady velocity into the fluorite structure.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text