On determination of the constitutive behavior of tempered martensitic steels from micro-indentations: Application to Eurofer97 steel

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper proposes a simple but powerful approach to determine the constitutive equation of tempered martensitic steels from micro-hardness tests. Finite element simulations were used to investigate the plastic flow in the contact region between the tip and the specimen. The simulations were validated by experimental tests carried out on the tempered martensitic steel Eurofer97 using a simple constitutive Ludwik-type equation. A series of simulations using different constitutive behaviors representative of possible irradiation-induced changes were run. In all cases, a pile-up of material against the indenter tip was observed that is strongly dependent on the constitutive law. Considering the real contact height of the indenter with the material, it was shown that the hardness scales with an averaged value of the flow stress over 30% of plastic strain. In addition, the parameters of Ludwik equation were shown to be determinable from the two experimental quantities that are the hardness and the ratio between the contact height and the penetration depth of the tip.

Introduction

Among the small specimen test techniques used to determine mechanical properties, micro-hardness and nano-hardness experiments have been extensively used to extract parameters of the plastic flow [1], [2]. Hardness measurement requires a very small amount of material, which makes it an attractive method to follow the evolution of mechanical properties with irradiation, providing that a reliable method exists to correlate hardness data to other standard data. However, hardness is not a fundamental property of materials, so relating hardness to the flow stress (taken at a given strain or averaged over a strain range) is not straightforward [3]. Based upon both theoretical and experimental considerations, various analytical expressions between hardness and yield stress or ultimate tensile strength have been proposed [4], [5], [6]. These empirical calibrations are not universal in the sense that the parameters of the expressions are material dependent. Therefore, there is no guarantee that a calibration well-established for an unirradiated material remains the same for the same material after irradiation. A close look at the residual profile of the indentation and analysis of this pile-up with finite element simulations yields additional useful information on the strain-hardening of the materials as it was demonstrated in Santos et al. [7]. When hardness experiments are performed on materials that develop a pile-up or sink-in, the hardness, defined by the load divided by the projected contact area, can be determined from the experimental load-penetration depth curves only if one correctly accounts for the pile-up or sink-in geometry. Indeed, the contact height between the indenter tip and the materials is a function of the pile-up or sink-in geometry, which in turn depends on the overall constitutive behavior. Therefore, the hardness can be properly calculated only if a reliable model is available to relate the penetration depth to the contact height. This study was undertaken to search for an appropriate description of the contact area during the indent experiment on tempered martensitic steel. Using the knowledge of the experimental values of hardness and pile-up geometry, a simple method is proposed to determine the true-stress–strain curve.

Section snippets

Materials, indentations, and finite element models

The material used in this research is reduced activation Eurofer97 steel, heat E83697, 25-mm-thick plate, produced by Böhler AG. The chemical composition (wt.%) is Fe–8.9Cr–0.12C–0.46Mn–1.07W–0.2V–0.15Ta. The heat-treatment was at 1253 K for 0.5 h and tempering at 1033 K for 1.5 h. This steel is fully martensitic after quenching.

The microhardness tests were performed with an instrumented G200 MTS nanoindenter equipped with a high load module that allows reaching a maximum load of 10 N. A Vickers tip

Results and discussion

First, the experimental load-penetration depth of the Vickers indentation is presented along with the calculated curves of the 3D finite element model in Fig. 4. As can be seen, a very good correspondence between the two curves was found, in particular for the loading part. Fig. 4 also shows the calculated curve for the axisymmetric model that appears to be very close to the 3D Vickers one despite the difference in the tip geometry. Owing to this fact, the axisymmetric model was regarded as

Conclusions

Vickers micro-hardness test and finite element simulations were undertaken to determine the actual contact area of the indenter with the specimen as a function of the indenter penetration depth for tempered martensitic steels. Eurofer97 steel was used as the reference material to validate the finite element model. The Vickers indentations were carried out up to a load of 10 N with a fully instrumented G200 MTS nano-indenter. The experiments were supplemented with 3D finite element simulations

References (12)

  • Y.P. Sharkeev et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1997)
  • A. Mkaddem et al.

    J. Mater. Proc. Technol.

    (2006)
  • C. Santos et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1998)
  • P. Spätig et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2007)
  • M.Y. He et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2007)
  • C.-H. Hsu

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1986)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (2)

  • Dynamic study of contact damping in martensitic stainless steels using nano-indentation

    2020, Mechanics of Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another approach consists of using ad-hoc specimen geometry (Knitel et al., 2018) or extract the plastic flow properties indirectly from nano-indentation tests for example, which has become a conventional tool to investigate the linear elastic and plastic properties of materials at lower scales (Hay and Pharr, 2000; Hosemann et al., 2015; Lucas et al., 2007b; Oliver and Pharr, 2004). Although hardness is not a fundamental property of materials, various analytical expressions between hardness and flow stress have been proposed; typically, hardness has usually been correlated with either the yield stress, or the ultimate tensile strength or to an average value of the flow stress of materials (Cahoon, 1972; He et al., 2007; Spätig and Ilchuk, 2013). The general objective of this study is to improve our understanding of the underlying physics of the mechanical response of metallic materials deformed with nano-indentation tests.

View full text