Magnetization switching diagram of a perpendicular synthetic ferrimagnet CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB bilayer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.02.047Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Anisotropy, Zeeman and exchange energy determine sequence of magnetic transitions.

  • Three temperature ranges manifest different shapes of the hysteresis loop.

  • The critical transition fields are temperature dependent.

Abstract

Magnetic configurations in synthetic ferrimagnet CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB bilayer with strong perpendicular anisotropy have been systematically studied. Magnetization versus field hysteresis loop has been measured for different temperature ranging from 5 to 300 K. The applied field – temperature (H-T) magnetization switching diagram has been constructed by extracting the different switching fields as a function of temperature. This switching diagram can be well explained by considering the competition between energy barrier of layer’s magnetization reversal, interlayer exchange coupling, and Zeeman energy.

Introduction

Ferromagnetic layers exchange coupled antiferromagnetically known as Synthetic antiferromagnets (SAF) are currently used in technologically relevant systems such as magnetic random access memories (MRAMs) and read heads for magnetic data storage [1]. SAF using materials with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) are now used to combine higher densities, thermal stability and sharp magnetic switching. It is also expected to be used to reduce the critical current density in Spin-Transfer-Torque (STT) MRAM. Since the prediction of large domain wall velocity [2] and the possibility of all Optical switching PMA-SAF [3], [4] are attracting a lot of attention. Multilayer devices based on CoFeB ferromagnetic layers separated by a thin nonmagnetic layer attract attention of specialists due to various possible fields of practical application. Metallic spintronics based on CoFeB multilayered structures rapidly gains new areas of its application in sensor industry [5], [6], biomedicine, and information technologies [7], [8]. Magnetic structure of CoFeB single layers have been studied in detail [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Numerous reports on methods for inducing domain walls by electric current [15], [16], manipulating them [17], [18], [19], and reversing polarity of perpendicularly polarized nanosized single- and multilayer magnets without external magnetic field [20] by means of local electric fields [21], [22] and currents [23], [24], [25] can be found for single CoFeB magnets. However, magnetization reversal of multilayer magnetic structures remains a challenge due to a complicated game of anisotropy of layers [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], DMI interaction [31], [32], tensile strains [33], [34] and interlayer coupling [35], [36]. The magnetic configurations present in in-plane antiferromagnetically exchange coupled bilayers, as well as bilayers with PMA, have been studied in the past [37], [38], [39]. In the recent papers [35], [36] dependence of the exchange interaction value and sign on the thickness of non magnetic spacer was demonstrated. However, one of the unclear questions is determination of correspondence between the energy balance of key interactions (exchange coupling EEX, Zeeman energy EZ and barriers of reversal magnetization Eeff1 and Eeff2) and sequence of the magnetization switching under external magnetic field. Here we will demonstrate that sequence of the magnetization switching depends on the ratio between the exchange coupling and barrier of reversal magnetization.

Convenient diagram technique to predict sequence of switching of the bilayered devices depending on the ratio of layers magnetization and potential barriers of the reversal magnetization is proposed in our article. Sequence of the magnetization switching and shape of the hysteresis loop as well as prohibited and permitted transitions and their threshold magnetic fields controlled by competition between EEX, EZ, Eeff1 and Eeff2 values has been determined in our work. The experimental results are summarized in switching diagram of the magnetization states and transitions between different states depending on temperature T, applied field H and the thermal and magnetic prehistory in a perpendicularly magnetized antiferromagnetically exchange coupled CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB bilayer.

Section snippets

Experimental

The multilayer system which consists of MgO(2.5)/CoFeB(1.1)/Ta(0.75)/CoFeB(0.8)/MgO(2.5)/Ta(5) (unit of nm) was deposited on the undoped GaAs (001) substrate (Fig. 1) by magnetron sputtering. The GaAs substrate was selected for easy integration into semiconductor based devices, such as spin LED structures [40], [41], and for future semiconductor spintronics application. Growth conditions are described in detail in [42], [43]. In the investigated layer stack, the hybridization of the 3d orbitals

Results and discussion

The magnetic hysteresis loops of the bilayer system at T = 300 K, 150 K and 50 K are presented in the Fig. 2. The insert in the Fig. 2a summarizes four different states (two parallel ↑↑, ↓↓ and two antiparallel ↑↓, ↓↑ states) corresponding to different magnetization orientations in agreement with our previous study [40]. To identify the switching sequence for bottom and top CoFeB layers from M-H curves, we have performed spin-LED measurement, which is only sensitive to the magnetization state of the

Conclusions

Magnetization states and transitions for perpendicularly magnetized antiferromagnetically exchange coupled CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB bilayers have been studied. Those states and transitions are summarized in a H-T magnetization switching diagram. The sets of permitted and forbidden interstate magnetization transitions are different for 2 K–110 K, 120 K–170 K and 180 K–300 K temperature ranges. The threshold magnetic fields of magnetization switching and the correspondent magnetic hysteresis loop are explained

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the joint France, National Research Agency (ANR)-National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (NSFC) SISTER project (Grants No. ANR-11-IS10-0001 and No. NNSFC 61161130527) and ENSEMBLE project (Grants No. ANR-14-0028-01 and No. NNSFC 61411136001) as well as by Région Lorraine. And by the ANR-NSF Project, ANR-13-IS04-0008-01, COMAG by the ANR-Labcom Project LSTNM and by the Université de la Grande Region (UniGR funded P. Pirro Post-Doc). Experiments were

References (45)

  • J.M. Teixeira et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. B

    (2006)
  • Jaehun Cho et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2015)
  • J. Wells et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2016)
  • E. Albisetti et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2016)
  • D.C. Ralph et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2008)
  • L. Cuchet et al.

    Sci. Rep.

    (2016)
  • M. Kuteifan et al.

    AIP Adv.

    (2016)
  • S. Alebrand et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2012)
  • S. Mangin et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2014)
  • G.A. Wang et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2010)
  • S. Ikeda et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2010)
  • X. Wang

    Metallic Spintronic Devices

    (2014)
  • R. Valenzuela et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1997)
  • S.A. Manuilov et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2011)
  • J.-P. Tetienne et al.

    Science

    (2014)
  • S. Peng et al.

    Sci. Rep.

    (2015)
  • L. Heyne et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2008)
  • S. Fukami et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2011)
  • C.J. Durrant et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2016)
  • L. Herrera Diez et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2015)
  • L. You et al.

    PNAS

    (2015)
  • H. Ohno et al.

    Nature

    (2000)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Inertial effects in ultrafast spin dynamics

      2023, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
    • Change in blocking temperature of nanoparticle array deposited on magnetoresistive sensor

      2022, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      In (↑↑), (↓↓), (↓↑) and (↑↓) symbols, the first arrow corresponds to the direction of the thin layer magnetization, while the second arrow corresponds to the direction of the thick layer magnetization (close to the substrate). The interstate transitions between the P+, P–, AP+, and AP– states occur at well-defined magnetic field determined in our previous paper [19]. We recorded temperature dependences of the out-of-phase magnetic susceptibility χ’’(T) at different frequencies f of AC field in NPs array deposited on ferromagnetic CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB multilayers and diamagnetic GaAs platform (Fig. 1).

    • Temperature-dependent magnetic transitions in CoCrPt-Ru-CoCrPt synthetic ferrimagnets

      2021, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      These energy diagrams are constructed using the fitted parameters from Fig. 5. Both energy diagrams in Fig. 6a and 6b show magnetic transitions corresponding to the type I regime [1]. The transition field for ↑↑-↑↓ (where m1 reversal occurs) is predicted to be 1400 Oe and 950 Oe at 200 K and 370 K, respectively.

    • Effect of Co layer thickness on magnetic relaxation in Pt/Co/Ir/Co/Pt/GaAs spin valve

      2018, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this paper, dynamics of magnetic relaxation in the Pt/Co/Ir/Co/Pt/GaAs samples with different Co layer thickness are reported. A thorough study of magnetization of this system as a function of temperature and magnetic field as well as an estimation of magnetic anisotropy and interlayer exchange interaction were presented in our previous paper [8]. The present paper aims at: 1) revealing the effect of the Co layer thickness on magnetic relaxation in spin valve Pt/Co/Ir/Co/Pt/GaAs; 2) selection of the convenient analytical description of magnetic relaxation in the multilayered Pt/Co/Ir/Co/Pt/GaAs system.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text