Journal of Molecular Biology
Mechanism of Replicative DNA Polymerase Delta Pausing and a Potential Role for DNA Polymerase Kappa in Common Fragile Site Replication
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
► Mechanisms by which CFS repeat sequences affect Pols are unknown. ► Polymerase δ pauses at microsatellite and palindromic sequences within CFSs. ► Polymerase δ pausing is due to sequence-specific polymerase dissociation. ► Polymerase κ displays more efficient synthesis of CFS repeat sequences. ► Polymerase κ may be required for replication of CFS repeat sequences in cells.
Introduction
Genomic instability is a driving force of tumor evolution and numerous biochemical mechanisms are required for accurate genome maintenance and duplication in normal cells. Chromosomal fragile sites are genomic loci that are prone to instability in the form of gaps and breaks under specific cellular conditions.1 Common fragile sites (CFSs) exist in all individuals as normal chromosomal components but undergo breakage at increased frequencies upon treatment of cells with specific chemicals, such as aphidicolin.[1], [2] Of clinical significance, breakpoints of chromosomal translocations and deletions in several tumor types have been mapped to CFSs.[1], [3], [4] A large number of studies have shown that loss of specific replication, cell cycle checkpoint, and DNA repair proteins leads to CFS instability.[1], [5], [6], [7] These findings suggest that maintenance of CFS stability in normal cells requires DNA replication checkpoint and repair responses. Several non-mutually exclusive models have been proposed to explain the propensity for specific chromosomal breakage within CFS regions. These models include, but are not limited to, late timing of CFS replication,8 paucity of replication initiation events within CFSs,9 failure to activate additional replication origins under stress,10 altered epigenetic patterns,11 and collision of the transcription and replication machinery within long genes.12
Ectopic integration of ~ 140- to 150-kb FRA3B sequences led to increased aphidicolin-induced gaps and breaks at the new chromosomal location.13 In addition to studies showing altered DNA replication initiation within CFSs, non-B DNA secondary structures, such as hairpins, cruciforms, and large AT-rich flexibility regions, have been hypothesized to hinder elongation by the replication machinery, thus contributing to slowed replication at CFSs.[1], [7], [14], [15] Clusters of AT-rich flexibility peaks may act as sinks for the superhelical density generated ahead of the replication fork, thereby hindering efficient topoisomerase activity and inhibiting replication fork progression.14 Experimentally, an [AT/TA]34 microsatellite derived from FRA16D and predicted to form a large hairpin structure was shown to induce replication fork stalling and chromosomal fragility in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae model.16 In human cells, replication blockage was also shown to occur preferentially near AT-rich regions within FRA16C, even in the absence of aphidicolin, and the rate of replication fork progression was found to be decreased within FRA16C, compared to the whole genome.10 While these experiments demonstrate that AT-rich regions within CFSs impede the replication fork, the degree to which DNA synthesis by the replicative polymerases is affected has not been extensively investigated. We previously showed that a mononucleotide [A]28 repeat derived from a region within FRA16D contributed to the pausing of DNA synthesis in vitro by the replicative polymerases α and δ [DNA polymerase (Pol) δ].17 In a recent genome-wide statistical modeling study of genomic features distinguishing CFS from non-fragile regions, we found that mononucleotide A/T microsatellite coverage (associated with Alu repeats), low-complexity AT coverage, and DNA flexibility are significant predictors of CFS regions in alternative models.18
Specialized Pols may be required for synthesis of naturally occurring alternative DNA structures that replicate late in S phase, such as those found within CFSs. Depletion of Pol η leads to increased chromosomal breakage at FRA7H, a slight delay in S phase, and a decrease in the number of late S phase replication foci.19 Depletion of either Pol η or Pol κ results in increased double-stranded breaks upon ectopic integration of constructs containing non-B DNA elements.20 We recently showed that Pol κ displays significantly less synthesis termination within mononucleotide [T]1121 and dinucleotide [GT]10 microsatellites, compared to replicative polymerases.22 These findings led us to hypothesize that Pol κ may also be important for maintaining efficient replication through CFS sequences.
The goals of this study were to understand (1) the mechanisms limiting replicative Pol δ DNA synthesis through specific sequence elements contained within CFS regions and (2) the potential contribution of the specialized Pol κ to efficient CFS DNA synthesis. We demonstrate that Pol δ undergoes significant pausing at three types of repetitive sequence elements, AT-rich microsatellites (A/Tn and AT/TAn) and quasi-palindromes (QPs), in a length-dependent manner. Mechanistically, we show that Pol δ pause sites within CFS sequences represent sites of enzyme dissociation from the DNA template. Finally, we show that DNA synthesis by Pol κ is significantly more efficient through these types of repetitive elements found within CFS templates. Based on our in vitro findings, we propose that the specialized Pol κ might function in replication of repetitive DNA sequences in order to maintain CFS stability.
Section snippets
Polymerase pausing assay
We analyzed the efficiency of polymerase DNA synthesis using templates corresponding to CFS sequences and an in vitro primer extension assay that models DNA synthesis on the lagging strand of the replication fork. Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) templates that contain ~ 120–170 base pairs derived from the reference sequences for FRA16D or FRA3B were constructed (Table 1 and Fig. 1). These templates harbor repetitive sequence elements identified using the Non-B DNA Database
Discussion
Genome instability is a hallmark of tumorigenesis, and chromosomal rearrangements in tumor cells frequently occur at CFSs. Determining the genomic features that contribute to CFS instability and the replication proteins that maintain stability in normal cells will expand our understanding of how genome instability arises during tumorigenesis. Here, we investigated the DNA sequence elements and Pols that affect the efficiency of DNA synthesis, in order to gain insight into whether the elongation
Replication proteins
Recombinant human four-subunit Pol δ and PCNA were purified using baculovirus expression systems, as described previously.52 Human Pol κ and additional PCNA were purchased from Enzymax (Lexington, KY). Yeast RFC was a generous gift from Dr. Gregory D. Bowman.
Vector constructs
Oligonucleotides corresponding to FRA16D or FRA3B regions (derived from GenBank accessions AF217490 and 183583557, respectively) were purchased from IDT (Coralville, IA). Double-stranded DNA for cloning was generated for each
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant number CA100060 to K.A.E. and grant number GM313973 to M.Y.L) and the Gittlen Cancer Research Foundation (Penn State Hershey Medical Center). This project was also funded, in part, under a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Health using Tobacco CURE Funds (SAP# 4100042746 to K.A.E.). The Department of Health specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions. The authors thank Suzanne
Glossary
- Common fragile sites:
- Genomic loci that undergo a high frequency of chromosomal breakage under specific cellular conditions of replication stress.
- Microsatellites:
- DNA sequences of 1–6 base pairs repeated in tandem.
- Quasi-palindromes:
- Repetitive DNA sequence elements composed of an imperfect palindrome (inverted repeat sequence) separated symmetrically by an intervening sequence. DNA hairpins predicted to form within quasi-palindromes: stem structures are formed by intramolecular base pairing within
References (52)
- et al.
Common fragile sites: mechanisms of instability revisited
Trends Genet.
(2012) - et al.
The complex basis underlying common fragile site instability in cancer
Trends Genet.
(2012) - et al.
Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites
Mol. Cell
(2011) - et al.
Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes
Mol. Cell
(2011) - et al.
An AT-Rich sequence in human common fragile site FRA16D causes fork stalling and chromosome breakage in S. cerevisiae
Mol. Cell
(2007) - et al.
The characterization of the common fragile site FRA16D and its involvement in multiple myeloma translocations
Genomics
(2000) - et al.
Human chromosome fragility
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
(2008) - et al.
Mechanism of a genetic glissando*: structural biology of indel mutations
Trends Biochem. Sci.
(2006) - et al.
Positive correlation between DNA polymerase [alpha]-primase pausing and mutagenesis within polypyrimidine/polypurine microsatellite sequences
J. Mol. Biol.
(2004) - et al.
Cis and trans-acting effects on a mutational hotspot involving a replication template switch
J. Mol. Biol.
(2006)
The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork
DNA Repair
Three DNA polymerases, recruited by different mechanisms, carry out NER repair synthesis in human cells
Mol. Cell
The Werner syndrome exonuclease facilitates DNA degradation and high fidelity DNA polymerization by human DNA polymerase δ
J. Biol. Chem.
Down-regulation of DNA polymerases [kappa], [eta], [iota], and [zeta] in human lung, stomach, and colorectal cancers
Cancer Lett.
Chromosome fragile sites
Annu. Rev. Genet.
DNA instability at chromosomal fragile sites in cancer
Curr. Genomics
A survey of homozygous deletions in human cancer genomes
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome
Nature
Understanding the molecular basis of common fragile sites instability: role of the proteins involved in the recovery of stalled replication forks
Cell Cycle
Replication of a common fragile site, FRA3B, occurs late in S phase and is delayed further upon induction: implications for the mechanism of fragile site induction
Hum. Mol. Genet.
Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site
Nature
Common fragile sites are characterized by histone hypoacetylation
Hum. Mol. Genet.
Stably transfected common fragile site sequences exhibit instability at ectopic sites
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
Molecular basis for expression of common and rare fragile sites
Mol. Cell. Biol.
Molecular characterization of a common fragile site (FRA7H) on human chromosome 7 by the cloning of a simian virus 40 integration site
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
DNA structure and the Werner protein modulate human DNA polymerase delta-dependent replication dynamics within the common fragile site FRA16D
Nucleic Acids Res.
Cited by (48)
Centromere: A Trojan horse for genome stability
2023, DNA RepairVariation in G-quadruplex sequence and topology differentially impacts human DNA polymerase fidelity
2022, DNA RepairCitation Excerpt :Pol η is critical for replicating and maintaining common fragile sites [5,6]. Pol κ can efficiently synthesize AT repeats and quasipalindromes [7] and promotes recovery of stalled replication forks [8]. G-quadruplexes (G4s) are a type of non-B DNA structure formed through Hoogsteen base pairing of repeated guanines within tracts (G-tracts) separated by loop sequences and stabilized by monovalent cations [9–12].
Structural switching/polymorphism by sequential base substitution at quasi-palindromic SNP site (G → A) in LCR of human β-globin gene cluster
2022, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesDynamic Assembly and Disassembly of the Human DNA Polymerase δ Holoenzyme on the Genome In Vivo
2020, Cell ReportsCitation Excerpt :We found Halo-PCNA-SNAP-Pol δ colocalizations lasted for a median time of ∼4 s (Figure 4F), enough time for Pol δ4 to synthesize ∼425 nt and for Pol δ3 to synthesize ∼80 nt, based on in vitro rates (Hedglin et al., 2016; Meng et al., 2010). However, the Pol δ holoenzyme polymerization rate is greatly influenced by template sequence, slowing particularly through repetitive elements (Shah et al., 2010; Walsh et al., 2013), which comprise approximately 50% of the human genome (Treangen and Salzberg, 2011). Therefore, it would be predicted from processivity and polymerase rate measurements that several Pol δ3 (or possibly δ4) molecules would be required to synthesize of an Okazaki fragment.
Sequence and Nuclease Requirements for Breakage and Healing of a Structure-Forming (AT)n Sequence within Fragile Site FRA16D
2019, Cell ReportsCitation Excerpt :Previously, Zhang and Freudenreich (2007) found that the Flex1 (AT)34 sequence causes replication fork stalling during plasmid replication in S. cerevisiae. To test the site of stalling and extend this result to the human enzyme, human four-subunit polymerase δ holoenzyme (Pol δ4) DNA synthesis through either the control or Flex1 ssDNA with various AT repeat lengths in the presence of replication factor C (RFC)-loaded proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was measured using an in vitro primer extension assay as described in Shah et al. (2010); Walsh et al. (2013), and Barnes et al. (2017). Pausing was identified as sites of accumulated primer extension reaction products.