Elsevier

The Journal of Hand Surgery

Volume 36, Issue 10, October 2011, Pages 1626-1630
The Journal of Hand Surgery

Scientific article
The Biomechanical Effect of the Distal Interosseous Membrane on Distal Radioulnar Joint Stability: A Preliminary Anatomic Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.016Get rights and content

Purpose

The distal interosseous membrane (DIOM) is a secondary stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and has a considerably variable morphology. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether innate DRUJ stability is influenced by the anatomic variation of the DIOM.

Methods

Ten fresh-frozen cadaver upper extremities were used in this study. The humerus and the ulna were affixed rigidly to a custom-made apparatus, with the elbow in 90° of flexion. Testing was performed by translating the radius in volar and dorsal directions relative to the ulna, with a 20-N applied force in neutral forearm alignment, 60° pronation, and 60° supination. Total translation of the radius was measured as DRUJ laxity. After the experiment, we investigated anatomic variation of the DIOM, especially regarding the existence of the distal oblique bundle (DOB), which is a notably thick fiber within the DIOM. We compared the DRUJ stability between the groups with and without the DOB.

Results

The DOB was found in 4 of 10 specimens. The group with a DOB demonstrated a significantly greater DRUJ stability in the neutral position than the group without a DOB. In pronated and supinated forearm positions, no significant difference in DRUJ stability was obtained between the groups with and without a DOB.

Conclusions

Innate DRUJ stability in the neutral forearm position was greater in the group with a DOB than in those without a DOB.

Clinical relevance

This study suggests that considerable variation exists in DRUJ laxity and that it partially depends on anatomical variations of the DIOM.

Section snippets

Specimen preparation

Ten fresh-frozen cadaver upper extremities (5 male, 5 female), amputated at the mid-portion of the humerus, were used for this study. The ages ranged from 59 to 91 years (mean, 79 y). There was no history of wrist or forearm trauma or disease in any of the specimens. All specimens were evaluated radiographically, and we rejected any specimens with evidence of instability or articular pathology. The specimen's ulnar variance was also assessed using posteroanterior radiographs. Six cases were

Biomechanical analysis

The average DRUJ laxity (mean ± SD) of the 10 specimens was 18.8 ± 5.4 mm in the neutral position, 14.3 ± 4.1 mm in pronation, and 16.0 ± 4.1 mm in supination. Average DRUJ laxity (mean ± SD) in the group with a DOB (n = 4) was 14.8 ± 4.4 mm in neutral position, 11.9 ± 5.2 mm in pronation, and 13.3 ± 4.5 mm in supination. The group with a DOB showed a significantly greater DRUJ stability in the neutral position than the group without a DOB (P < .05) (Fig. 2). In the pronated and supinated

Discussion

We found in this study that the degree of displacement of the radius relative to the ulna was smaller in the group with a DOB than without a DOB in the neutral forearm position, which suggests that DRUJ laxity was greater in the group without a DOB than with a DOB. The TFCC is the primary soft-tissue DRUJ stabilizer and, in normal situations, the influence of the DIOM on the DRUJ stability is relatively inconsequential. However, after TFCC injury or ulnar head resection, it is likely that the

Cited by (72)

View all citing articles on Scopus

All work performed at Mayo Clinic Rochester.

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

View full text